New Foreclosure Crisis Has Much Broader Implications

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


According to international economist Hernando De Soto, one of the key differences between an undeveloped economy and a developed one is clarity of ownership of real estate. The recently emerging foreclosure crisis in the United States indicates a movement toward the the third world model.

There is still a large overhang of U.S. properties with severe mortgage delinquencies and this problem is likely to continue for several more years. As early as three years ago however, problems with implementing the foreclosure process became evident. During the housing bubble, banks became sloppy and didn't properly transfer ownership papers when loans were securitized into bonds. The current owners of those bonds frequently can't produce the appropriate documents in foreclosures cases in the 23 states that require court action for a foreclosure. This led to the 'show me the note' movement after a federal judge ruled in 2007 that Deutsche Bank lacked standing in 14 foreclosure cases because it could not produce the relevant documents. A number of similar judicial rulings followed.

The banks have gotten around this problem by producing notarized affidavits from 'expert' witnesses who claim they have thoroughly reviewed a packet of documents related to an individual foreclosure and that they are valid and complete. One such 'expert' was Jeffrey Stephan, who has admitted under oath to having signed off on the documents for 10,000 foreclosure cases per month for the last five years. Mr. Stephan not only did this for GMAC (its parent Ally Financial is 56% owned by the U.S. government), but also for J.P. Morgan Chase and numerous other banks. This process is now being called robo-signing. It should be referred to as robo-perjury. While I am not a lawyer, it would seem to me that a number of other possible crimes might also be involved here as well, such as racketeering and criminal conspiracy Whatever criminal activity took place, a majority government owned enterprise participated in it. 

Readers should ask themselves if there is any reason to think that the big banks are acting any differently in their other consumer credit cases, such as defaults on credit cards.

The revelations from GMAC loan officer Stephan have caused a foreclosure moratorium to be put into effect by a number of lenders. The lenders were apparently shocked to find out that one person couldn't actually read and thoroughly review 10,000 legally dense document packets per month. Apparently none of the 'brilliant' members of the U.S. judiciary caught on either. Yes, it would certainly have taken a legal genius of Clarence Darrow's caliber to figure out that something that was impossible just couldn't happen. GMAC was the first to stop foreclosures in the 23 judicial states (those that require court cases for foreclosure). J.P. Morgan Chase followed. On October 8th, Bank of America suspended foreclosure activity in all 50 states.

Interestingly, the current administration is opposed to a foreclosure freeze. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, employees of J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs were three of the largest sources of funds for Obama's 2008 presidential bid. Only a cynic would think that this would have something to do with his administration's pro-bank view in the foreclosure crisis. Some might even claim that it looks like everything is being done to further the interests of a economic and political elite, just as happens in a corrupt third world country. If this were true, the banks won't be punished for flagrantly disregarding the rule of law, since it is only the little people that need to worry about such niceties.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

What Earnings Are Telling Us

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

In general, company earnings are coming in ahead of extremely lowered expectations this quarter. This is a typical Wall Street game of setting the bar low enough so things look good, no matter how bad they are. The big success stories this quarter are technology firms, such as Intel, Apple, Yahoo and Sandisk. Tech earnings are cyclical however and the big traders tend to sell when earnings look the best. It is not clear yet if we are at that point his quarter. The large majority of tech company earnings come from outside the U.S. and their business picking up says more about the state of the economy in East Asia than it does about the U.S. economy.

In contrast to tech, banks are in increasingly bad shape, even in the cases where they are reporting good earnings. Wells Fargo's earnings were out today. Well Fargo said credit losses rose to $5.1 billion, up from $2 billion a year ago and $4.4 billion in the second quarter. Even though this is the bank's core business, it reported a profit of 56 cents per share last quarter, higher than the 49 cents reported a year ago. Wells is the fourth largest bank in the U.S. The pattern of deteriorating loan portfolios was also seen in Bank of America, Citigroup, and JP Morgan. Loan losses also increased in the second quarter. These numbers don't indicate that U.S. consumers and businesses are in good financial shape, nor that any economic recovery is taking place.

As for the the banking system having been saved, we will have to wait to see what happens when the unlimited flow of federal funds is cut off. TARP is supposed to expire at the end of this year. Today, however, President Obama is going to announce a $5 billion program to bail out community banks. Obama will tout the new program as funding to help these banks increase loans. TARP was supposed to accomplish this goal as well. Available U.S. consumer credit has taken a nosedive in the last year since TARP was implemented. There is obviously no lie too outrageous that Washington won't keep repeating it and the U.S. mainstream media won't print it.

It should also be kept in mind that many large cap firms other than tech get a lot of their earnings overseas. As the dollar falls, earnings made in other currencies increase proportionately. Once again this is not an indication of any U.S. economic recovery, but of U.S. economic weakness. The falling dollar is at least finally getting some coverage in the financial press. Business Week had a story on it in its latest issue. This is going to continue to be a big story for many years to come.

NEXT: Dance of the Declining Dollar Continues

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bank Earnings Reveal True State of Economy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Consumer spending represented 72% of the U.S. economy before the Credit Crisis hit. During the 2000s, that spending was fueled by easy credit and free money thanks to Federal Reserve and legislative policy. The borrowing binge hid a deteriorating economy for years and alternative economic statistics indicate that the U.S. has really been in a recession almost the entire last nine years. The bill has now come due and it is going to take many years to pay it off. The economy can not have a sustainable recovery under such circumstances no matter how many times Ben Bernanke and mainstream economists say this is happening. Wishing just doesn't make it so.

Bernanke has repeatedly told the world how he and the other central bankers saved the financial system from disaster (modesty along with good reality perception are not his strong points). It would be more accurate to state that they postponed disaster with their actions. It addition to an almost unlimited amount of money pumped into the global financial system (much of it freshly off the proverbial printing press), the U.S. changed its accounting rules on the toxic debt held by the big banks so massive losses could suddenly disappear into thin air. Big bank earnings rose spectacularly last quarter as a result. This blog pointed out at that time that losses for the lending operations - the reason banks are in business - were deteriorating however. This deterioration was being hidden by big 'gains' in bank's trading operations (thanks to the change in accounting rules). Those losses have continued to grow this quarter and for many banks are now outpacing the phantom gains from accounting tricks.

The two biggest U.S. banks at the beginning of the Credit Crisis were Citigroup and Bank of America. Last quarter Citi lost 27 cents per share versus a 61 cents loss in Q3 in 2008. Citi had $8 billion in net credit losses and increased its net loan loss reserves by $802 million between July and September. Bank of America lost 26 cents in Q3 versus a gain of 39 cents a year ago. Bank of America's credit losses last quarter were almost $10 billion ( a billion higher than in Q2) and it added a whopping $2.1 billion to its loan loss reserves. Credit card losses for Bank of America were $1.04 billion last quarter versus only $167 million a year earlier.Supposed 'gains' from trading operations kept the top line numbers from being much worse.

Does this look like a banking system that has been saved? Does this look like what would happen in a recovering economy? If the government took back the $45 billion in TARP funds from Citigroup would it be in business the next day? If not, it is insolvent. Ditto for Bank of America. As long as these banks (and others) are in the too big to fail category, money printing is going to be necessary to pay for the continued bailouts that they'll need. Government largess is the reason the stocks of these banks have not collapsed back to last years levels. The same can be said for the stock market overall.

NEXT: Big Bust on Wall Street

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market at a Key Juncture

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The Dow finally pierced and closed above its 200-day moving average yesterday, the last of the major indices to do so. This could be a possible end to the rally that began in early March, but we don't know for sure yet. The trade-weighted U.S. dollar hit major long-term support overnight and has so far managed to bounce off of it. Gold reached as high as 990, once again bumping up against its major resistance at a 1000. Oil has traded well above 68 and is close to important resistance at 70. At least a short term reversal of trends is possible for all of these markets. It will take awhile though to determine if this will turn into something bigger.

In many ways the dollar is key to all the other markets. The trade-weighted dollar fell as low as 78.40 last night and made a double bottom on the short term charts. Major support is at 78.33, which was the low point of a large reverse head and shoulder bottom pattern made between 1991 and 1993. This support was broken in 2007 and the dollar then fell to around the 72 area. The dollar traded as low as 79 at the end of last year before recovering. What saved the dollar from the precipice last night was 'unnamed sources' telling Reuters that "a downgrade in the U.S. sovereign credit rating would not discourage Asian central banks from buying U.S. treasuries." Now I wonder who could have planted that story at such a convenient time? You should also be wondering are these Asian central bankers really that dumb or should they be suing Reuters for libel?

The short term key to whether or not stocks can hold their gains and go higher is whether or not the Nasdaq can hold above its 200-day moving average. Nasdaq was the first to break through this key resistance and has been leading the market up since the bottom. The Dow is the market laggard, although its position might improve in a few days when major losers GM and Citigroup are removed from the index and replaced by Cisco and Travelers. The Nasdaq 200 line is currently at 1684 and still falling. Nasdaq is holding above 1800 this morning.

At this point, whether or not gold can finally make the break above the magic 1000 level will be determined by how the dollar holds up. If the dollar breaks below 78, gold will be breaking above a 1000 and will rally until the dollar fall is broken. Expect major government manipulation behind the scenes to try to prevent this scenario. If they fail here, they will try for a reversal lower down. A weak dollar will also boost oil to higher levels, although a good hurricane could do the same.

NEXT: Dollar Sage Continues; Commodities Take a Hit

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Banks Get Swine Flu; William Cohan at New York Investing

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The long awaited bank stress test is scheduled to be out this Thursday. There have already been more leaks in this government PR gambit than in a sinking ship. Meanwhile, the Swine Flu panic is winding down, with an article by TIME magazine this morning questioning whether all the hoopla was justified (see the Sunday and Saturday entries for this blog for a detailed analysis for why it wasn't). And finally, I will be interviewing best-selling author William Cohan at the New York Investing meetup tomorrow. Whether or not you saw him on the Daily Show with John Stuart or elsewhere on TV, this is your chance to see him in person.

In the news out today, Citigroup and Bank of America are stating that they are going to be raising $10 billion more in capital to shore up their reserves. Didn't both of these banks say they were profitable in the first quarter and planning on returning TARP funds? Something seems to be inconsistent with this story. Wells Fargo and PNC Financial also need more capital. The U.S. banking system is by no means stable yet and if the Fed withdraw all the funding it is providing from its half dozen or so programs, almost every major U.S. bank would collapse immediately.

While it is difficult for the average person to understand how poorly the government has handled the Credit Crisis, it is much easier to see how badly they have handled the current outbreak of swine flu (the 1976 outbreak was bungled as well and had tragic consequences for hundreds of people who participated in the government's vaccination program - there was only one supposed swine flu death). A number of the top government medical authorities made dire warnings of impending tragedy and sounded the alarm bells at top volume in the last two weeks. Not only is there no rising death toll as they warned us about, but there are no deaths at all outside of Mexico. Even the supposed deaths that have taken place in Mexico are questionable. Over a week ago, Mexico claimed 160 deaths from swine flu had taken place, the current claim is 20. Mexico's health care statistics seem to be about as reliable as most U.S. banks financial statements (see the previous blog entry for more about this).

If you are in the New York metro area, you should be coming to the May 5th meeting of the New York Investing meetup tomorrow (PS 41, 116 West 11th Street at 6th Avenue, starting at 6:45PM, for more details see: http://investing.meetup.com/21). I will be interviewing William Cohan about his latest book, "House of Cards", which is about the demise of Bear Stearns (New York Investing was the first major group to predict that this would happen in August 2007). Cohan doesn't make a lot of personal appearances, so this is your opportunity to not only hear what he has to say about the Credit Crisis, but get him to sign of copy of his book for you.

NEXT: Market Getting Frothy; Meeting tonight for New York Investing

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Will Reward Real Value Going Forward

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Stocks rallied again yesterday and are doing so again this morning. Deconstructing this rally can provide investors with a lot of useful information going forward. While much of what it is taking place so far is short covering, some of that can turn into sustainable price increases and some of it can't. The market is also showing a clear preference for value over growth and hard assets over future promises, which makes perfect sense in a down economy with impending inflation.

The biggest up moves have been seen in the financial stocks. Many of them have massive short positions and in such cases any little piece of news can cause a big rally. It is also quite easy to have a big percentage gain if your company's stock was as low as 97 cents as Citigroup was. A move to 1.85 (the price as I write this) means a rally of over 85%. In the very short term, the big money is in the financials (if you trade them, watch them like a hawk). Nothing has really changed in their underlying value however. Many are still essentially insolvent, even if they haven't been fully nationalized yet like AIG, FNM, and FRE. Interestingly, bankrupt AIG, Fannie and Freddie are still trading and are in the pennies. They have not participated in the rally. You can expect many of the financials to come right back down and at some point to stay there.

Commodity stocks have also had nice rallies in many cases, but nothing like the financials. The represent extreme value and the possibility of sustainable action in long term (many of them actually bottomed sometime between last October and December and made a bullish divergence with the rest of market by not going to new lows in the recent sell off). In most cases they own large deposits of oil or metals, as opposed to worthless pieces of paper. These will not only maintain their value, but increase it at rates faster than inflation. In contrast to these hard asset stocks are growth stocks, which frequently have very limited real assets but are valued based on their future business. These are the stars in long term bull markets (think tech stocks in the 1990s), but are put on the back burner in long term bear markets. The IBD 100 is good proxy for this group. It has underperformed the market indices in this rally and this is not surprising. The days of easy money in this group are not likely to return soon.

Like all rallies off the bottom, the first down move will be important. Minimally, you don't want to see the recent lows broken and you would like to see the low of the first down move put in by next Friday and then a rally follow that. If the market breaks the lows from last week, a drop to the next major support levels is likely. This will almost certainly happen in the future, but doesn't have to happen right now. Long down moves in bear markets are frequently interupted by nice rallies on the upside.

NEXT: Today's Economic Lunacy

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Analysis of Tuesday's Market Action

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Stocks had a spectacular rally yesterday, with the Dow being up 5.8%, the S&P 500 6.4% and the Nasdaq and Russell 2000 7.1%. Many individual stocks did much better. Unfortunately the rally was lead by insolvent financials (Citi up 38% and Bank of America up 28%). Nothing has really changed to fix their problems and make them worth something. Many beaten down commodity stocks posted double digit gains as well and unlike financials these have real long term value. Inflation hedges, gold and silver declined while stocks went up and oil showed weakness in the afternoon. While the charts indicate a stock rally should be taking place right around this point, a test of the lows (with a lower low by no means out of the question) is likely again within about two weeks or so and after that a longer lasting rally is possible.

This rally will only be a Bear Market rally. Buy and hold for stocks is dead for the moment. This is not a bad thing however. It just requires a different investing mindset. Ignore the media pundits that continually point out that it's only a Bear Market rally as if somehow the money you make from it doesn't count. Bear Market rallies can provide you with the biggest profits in the shortest period of time - what more could an investor want? The biggest monthly rallies of all time in U.S. stocks were in fact in the 1930s during the Great Depression. The Dow was up 40% in April 1933 (it best month ever) and 35% in August 1932.

As we mentioned yesterday, a 'leaked' memo from Citigroup CEO Pandit set off the rally. This memo was reported to have said the Citi was 'profitable' for the first two months of the year. This seems to have been based on Citi having high revenue numbers (sales) in January and February - just as it did in every quarter where it had massive losses because of all the write downs it had to take. Just as changes in demand mean nothing unless you know changes in supply, revenues mean nothing unless you know expenses. It is amazing that traders fall for this blatant manipulation, but it works like a charm every time, which is why it continues.

The demand without supply argument has been the prevalent press coverage for the oil market for some time now. Oil dropped yesterday afternoon because the U.S. Energy Department cut its demand for global oil use by 1.4 million barrels a day for 2009 (rumors preceded the actual announcement). This has led to a lot more press today about falling demand for oil and how bearish this is. Traders sold oil down on this 'bad' news. Assuming that this agency has the slightest idea of what it is doing (I am not vouching for that), this was actually very bullish news. How can that be? Sometimes in the very same articles, which stated how negative the demand situation is, you could find that OPEC has cut production quotas by 4.2 million barrels a day (many discount this number to something lower). Let's see, demand is falling by 1.4 million barrels and supply is falling by a much larger 4.2 million barrels and the conclusion is that the price will go down. Did any of the financial reporters writing these articles pass Intro Economics? Doesn't look like it.

If you do have a longer term perspective, you will be better off buying commodity stocks. Since governments can't 'print' huge amounts of excess money without debasing their currency (another elementary idea from Intro Economics), lots of price inflation is inevitable and the value of tangible assets will be rising. Nice rallies took place in non-precious metal stocks yesterday, such as PCU, ZINC, AA and to a lesser extent FCX (as disclosure, I have held FCX for a couple of months now and bought some AA on Monday). Steel companies such as X also did spectacularly well. These are all strongly influenced by what is taking place in China and its desire to accumulate commodities for future use, so keep that in mind. The current economic situation is more than a bit iffy there, with bad trade numbers being released this morning.

While inflation hedges gold and silver weren't doing well yesterday, a report was released indicating confidence in U.S. sovereign debt has been deteriorating for the last year. Credit default swaps (CDSs are insurance for bonds) for U.S. treasuries are now being priced at seven times higher than they were twelve months ago. During the same period, CDSs for investment grade companies haven't even doubled. On the other hand, CDS rates for leading U.S. banks and brokers hit a record high this Monday. The big money players have little confidence in the U.S. financial system and are starting to question the viability of U.S. debt itself ... but don't worry, the U.S. government can always print more money to deal with the problem.

NEXT: How Media Manipulates Investors to do the Wrong Thing

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Stocks - the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

U.S. stocks gapped up today with the indices up 4% or more as I write this. Many individual stocks are up over 10%. While almost everything is up right now (except for gold and silver which are looking ugly at the moment), some of the rallies are more sustainable than others. In many cases, insolvent financial companies are up the most. Only for really short term traders do they offer opportunity however. Natural resource stocks on the other hand have real long term potential.

The oversold condition of the market is so extreme that it may be at historical levels. Under such circumstances, any little piece of news can ignite a sudden rally. Such bear market rallies are explosive and can last for weeks or even months. They are very tradeable and you can make a lot of money, but you have to get out and take your profits because the market is likely to go right back to where the rally started of even lower.

The news that started the rally today was Citigroup claiming it made a profit the first two months of this year. Indeed if the government pumps enough money into any given company it will eventually become profitable, no matter how insolvent it might be. This was followed up by a statement by Fed Chair Bernanke that major U.S. banks would not be allowed to fail (no matter how incompetent their management is and no matter how much it costs the taxpayer - he left that part out). Bad financials are bad investments though no matter what the government does.

Natural resource stocks are where the good values are to found in the market right now. They own tangible assets that will not only maintain their worth, but will increase substantially in an inflationary environment. They have had incredible sell offs that have sent them to major bargain prices. Other than oil, which made a double bottom on the charts in December and February and is in a seasonally strong period until the summer, a number of non-precious metal stocks seemed to have bottomed last fall. Like oil, they have not hit new lows with the market. Such relative strength is impressive and should not be ignored.

NEXT: Analysis of Tuesday's Market Action

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Citi Dives, GDP Plunges - Both Off the Cliff

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Washington's mantra should be, "if it's broke, don't fix it and when it's not fixed, fudge the numbers". News of the latest government plan to rescue Citigroup came out this morning as did the revised GDP figures for Q4 2008. Today's government rescue of Citi is the third one in five months. Those rescues followed about half a dozen U.S. government assisted rescues that took place earlier. Note to Geithner, Bernanke, and Obama - doesn't look like what you are doing is working guys, you might want to consider Plan B. Citi's rescue isn't the only thing not working either, all the policy moves to prop up the ailing U.S. economy are fizzling as well and apparently the 'just lie about it and no one will notice' approach is falling apart too. The GDP figures for last quarter had a major downward revision (they are still much rosier than the actual numbers however, so don't get too excited just yet).

The Citibank bailout du jour can be summarized as 'U.S. taxpayers get screwed again' (just another example of how the government keeps your interests in mind). Taxpayers are going to get up to a 36% stake in the insolvent bank that has a net negative worth in exchange for the $25 billion (out of a total of $45 billion) of TARP funds that were previously provided to Citi. The remaining $20 billion of taxpayer provided funding will still be in the form of preferred that pays a dividend, but the option exists for also converting this to the worthless common stock. Other holders of 'bailout preferred', such as the Government of Singapore Investment Corp., Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, Capital Research Global Investors and Capital World Investors will be paid $3.25 per share for their preferred, instead of being forced to convert it to common stock that traded as low as $1.55 this morning (a deal that is more than 100% over market price sounds good to me - unfortunately only the well-connected rich and powerful get these arrangements, the small investor and taxpayer get the losses).

To say the least, the market didn't react favorably to the government's latest move on Citi. The stock was down as much as 37% at its low so far. Considering the dilution though, existing shareholders could see their stake fall to only 26% of the bank, this was really not a big drop at all. Still, $1.55 is above the penny level usually reserved for stocks in official bankruptcy and is well more than $1.55 above the real value of the company. New York Investing first said Citi was insolvent in late 2007 and well over a year later, the market is finally catching up with us. We have also said repeatedly that there is no such thing as a single bailout for an insolvent financial institution - Citi has shown just how true that statement is.

Another thing New York Investing has frequently pointed out is how the U.S. government is fudging its GDP reports. This blog scoffed at the original Q4 2008 report of a minus 3.8 decline in the economy and pointed out several absurd figures that were being used to calculate this number. Well, the government started to fess up this morning, when it stated there was actually a 6.2% decline in GDP last quarter (a drop of 8% to 9% is more likely). Certainly a step in the right direction, although the government is still claiming that the U.S. economy grew 1.1% in 2008. Maybe this is possible in some alternate universe, but not in the reality that most of us live in.

The next meeting of the New York Investing meetup is on Tuesday, March 3rd at PS 41, 116 West 11th Street (at 6th Ave) from 6:45 to 8:45PM. Click on the link below my name to RSVP. If you are in the New York metro area, you should attend.

NEXT: Technicals Ugly, Risk of Domino Bank Collapses

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Yes, Financials No

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Suddenly, oil inventories in Cushing, Oklahoma dropped by 200,000 barrels yesterday instead of increasing by 3.5 million barrels that industry 'experts' predicted. While I have predicted that this would happen in this blog and stated so at a class given this Tuesday by the New York Investing meetup, I was a lone voice in the wilderness. Before the news came out, oil ETFs were making new lows as were many financial stocks. While superficially oil and the financials looks like major bargains, only oil should be assumed to be so.

When the 'surprise' (only a surprise to people who get their information from the mass media) news came out that oil stocks had declined, the March contract for Light Sweet Crude jumped $4.86 to close at $39.48. April, which will be the front month after today, closed at $40.18. Anecdotal reports indicate supply is drying up, but you will not see any coverage of this in the American press, other than in relationship to OPEC. For those who are unaware of it (and this presumably includes all reporters on energy topics), every oil and gas lease in the United States contains a term that the producer can stop pumping if the prices aren't high enough. Based on the behavior of the oil futures, which have jumped back to the $40 level over and over again, the market is telling us a price under $40 a barrel just isn't sustainable.

Nevertheless, the coverage in the media today is once again the same old (off-key) song. You will see quotes like, "It was a significant move last night, but there's not much out there that can create a bullish story" . And the reason for this is, "The demand outlook is very weak, and there's nothing to suggest that it will improve in the near term." There is no analysis of the supply side of the equation, despite the news out of Cushing, Oklahoma yesterday. Supply dropping faster than demand is indeed a bullish story. The same reporters who know nothing about how the oil industry functions, also seem to have forgotten to take high school economics. The current coverage of oil is an excellent example of why the average investor who gets his or her (mis)information from the mass media can't make money in the markets.

While oil had a big pop up yesterday, financials hit their lows in many cases and remained at those levels. Citigroup fell to 2.50, Wells Fargo to 11.94 and Amex to 12.74. Bank of America dropped as low as 3.86, only a tinge above its low of 3.77. Collapsing financials led the market down and helped the Dow close at a six-year low. The possibility of a Swedish style bailout of the big banks is becoming more of a reality. This would wipe out the equity holders completely (which include every major pension fund in the United States as well as Wall Street insiders) and has been resisted for that reason. While there is a risk of losing everything if you buy financial stocks, no such risk exists with oil. All commodities have a minimal price which is the cost of production. The minimal price for a troubled stock however is zero.

NEXT: Stocks/Oil Trying to Bottom, Gold at Resistance

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Latest From Davos Switzerland

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The invitation only annual World Economic Forum - a meeting of world leaders, central bank heads, economists from big financial firms, and billionaire investors - is currently taking place at Davos, Switzerland. In an opening forum, the people who pull the strings of the global economy and stock markets came to the following conclusions (long after they have been obvious to everyone else):

1. The world is facing unprecedented economic challenges.
2. Fiscal packages may not be enough to restore economic growth.
3. The multilateral financial system needs strengthening.

Fortunately, George Soros gave an early talk that had somewhat more substance than the above long-on-platitudes and short-on-specifics comments. At the same time, Nouriel Roubini who is in Switzerland, but possibly not at the conference, released a purposely well-timed statement about just how costly it would be to fix the banking system.

Soros stated that the current crisis has the potential to be worse than the one during the Great Depression in the 1930s. According to his calculations, the global banking system in developed countries still needs an additional $1.5 trillion to be rescued. Furthermore, the only way to pay for this is with money creation, or in other words - inflation. Nouriel Roubini now says that he estimates the total global bank losses from the Credit Crisis will be $3.6 trillion, far higher than his original estimates (and mine as well, last July at a talk at St. Johns University, I estimated $2 trillion, which was double the consensus at the time). Roubini further stated the biggest U.S. banks are insolvent (New York Investing first said Citibank was insolvent at the end of 2007).

Expect some talk about the two approaches to fixing failed banking systems. These are the Japanese model and the Swedish model. The Japanese reacted to their failed banking system in the 1990s by propping up as many failed institutions for as long as possible and the consequence was economic and stock market stagnation that has now lasted almost two decades. The Swedes had a banking collapse in the mid-90s and took that opposite approach. They took swift and drastic action, which was painful in the short term, but proved highly successful and their economy revived quickly. So far, the United States has come closest to the failed Japanese model in dealing with the banking crisis. The political will to step on some very rich and powerful vested interests has been lacking as has the willingness to admit that top U.S. banks such as Citibank and Bank of America are insolvent.

One person that is not yet at Davos is Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke. He is busy keeping fed funds rates at zero at the Fed meeting in Washington. The meeting ends today and presumably he will be jetting off to Switzerland shortly thereafter. Expect the quality of debate at Davos to suffer accordingly.

NEXT: Government Wants to Play Good Bank, Bad Bank

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Volatility is Back

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The market was up yesterday almost completely erasing the large losses from the day before. The beaten down financial stocks led the way up as if insolvent banks and brokers are now suddenly doing better. Well they're not, but their stocks were doing better in what is obviously a short covering rally that was pushed to the max by media reports of insider buying (more accurately portrayed as insider manipulation of the media, with full cooperation of the media itself).

The Dow was up 3.5% to close at 8228, above the psychological important level 8000. Nasdaq was up 4.6%. IBM reported (please note the use of the word reported as opposed to had) good earnings. Bank stocks were the big gainers however and this was true in Europe as well as the U.S. Both Citigroup and Bank of America were up 31%, not so difficult when you are selling in the single digits (the low single digits in Citi's case). Bank of New York was up 24%. And Tuesday's poster child for stock market disaster, State Street, managed a 15% rally. The rallies were more muted in Europe however. Barclays, which has lost half its value since the beginning of the year, was up 5% and Bank of Scotland only 9%. In Germany, Deutsche Bank was up 10% and Commerzbank 13%. Belgium's bailout baby, KBC, was still falling though after already losing 70% in the last three weeks and receiving a two billion euro cash injection.

The rally in bank stocks started out as the usual dead cat (or more appropriately dead bank) bounce. It really got going when news hits the wires about top management buying their own beaten down financial shares. Anyone who might think this was a case of blatant manipulation would have a lot of evidence on their side. When was the last time you saw a blaring headline, 'Insiders Dumping Bank Stocks', especially if it happened the day before? Lot's of luck in finding that one. Yet, yesterday's news trumpeted, Bank of America and JP Morgan insiders buying their stock. You would have had to read well into any article however to find out that in the case of JP Morgan, the buying took place last Friday before the stock was pounded down even more on Tuesday. As for the insight of bank management insiders, these were the people who brought us the current Credit Crisis and didn't see it coming. The head of Bank of America thought it was a brilliant move for the bank to buy Countrywide Financial and later on agreed to buy Merrill Lynch, two purchases that are destroying the bank. Now, we should assume his judgement has suddenly sharpened. Yeahhh ..... that can happen!

The earnings of financials are so bad they are disproportionately responsible for dragging down the earnings of the S&P 500. For Q4 of 2008, a 20% drop in corporate earnings is now expected. Before earnings season began a 15% drop was projected, but results have been worse than orginally thought. Wall Street analysts have once again underestimated how bad things are, just as Wall Street economists have done with the economic figures. I have never heard of anyone on Wall Street being fired for being continually and consistently inaccurate. In fact, it seems to be the ticket to getting to the top there. Something to think about for anyone who relies on insider purchases to indicate banks are turning around.

NEXT: Britain Points the Way to U.S. Economic Future

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bank(rupt) of America Gets Government Bailout

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

This morning, only hours after getting another major infusion of bailout cash from the U.S. government, Bank of America reported its first quarterly loss in 17 years. The latest bailout became necessary because Bank of America's government arranged takeover of money- hemorrhaging Merrill Lynch (this took place after Bank of America's takeover of money- hemorrhaging Countrywide Financial). This time, it is at least being admitted that taxpayers are getting stuck with the loss. Things were so bad, that the government didn't even try to lie about. The Fed and Treasury weren't just busy with Bank of America last night either, but put the final touches on the latest scheme to keep Citigroup afloat.

While Citigroup has been struggling for survival for some time now, Bank of America was one of the few big banks and brokers that seemed t0 be getting along well enough despite the Credit Crisis. The loss of $1.79 billion, or 48 cents per share it reported today is small compared to the fourth-quarter net loss of $8.29 billion, or $1.72 per share, for Citigroup (its fifth quarterly loss in a row, but better than the $1.99 loss in the fourth quarter of 2007). However, Bank America's proposed acquisition Merrill Lynch lost a whopping $15.31 billion, or $9.62 per share, last quarter and things looked bad enough to potentially drag both companies into oblivion. Bank of America management claimed it didn't realize that Merrill's loses would be so high (makes you wonder just how accurate their loan analysis is - no wonder they thought sub-prime borrowers were good credit risks) threatened to KO the deal if the government didn't pay up.

The Treasury coughed up another $20 billion of TARP funds immediately. To this, they added a rescue package with the government agreeing to share in losses on $118 billion in residential and commercial mortgages, derivatives and corporate debt. Bank America will absorb the first $10 billion of losses, the government the next $10 billion, and the government 90 percent of the rest. Why taxpayers should get stuck paying off this debt is beyond me. Even worse, there will probably be more to pay down the road.

The Treasury was also busy coming up with a new idea for saving the beyond insolvent Citigroup. After more than a half-dozen bailouts since late 2007, the bank is still at risk of crumbling . The latest scheme is to split it into two businesses, Citicorp and Citi Holdings. Citicorp, will focus on traditional banking, while Citi Holdings will be the dumping ground for the company's riskier assets. CitiHoldings will account for $850 billion of Citigroup's $1.95 trillion in assets including CitiMortgage and CitiFinancial. It will also be in charge of Citi's 49 percent stake in the joint brokerage with Morgan Stanley, and the pool of about $300 billion in mortgages and other risky assets that the U.S. government agreed to backstop late last year. Citi's new structure is an almost complete reversal of the financial supermarket approach it adopted in the late 1990s and which everyone on Wall Street thought was one of the best ideas ever (so much for that). The company isn't out of the woods yet either. The fourth quarter earnings report showed that credit deterioration was severe from North America to Europe to Latin America to Asia.

NEXT: Inaguaration Day 2009 - Looking for a New Beginning

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bailout Cost: $8.5 Trillion so far ... and Counting

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

One analysis has calculated that so far the bailout efforts of the U.S. government are up to $8.5 trillion. This is almost as much as the U.S. National Debt was when the bailout efforts began. So basically in a year the U.S. government has managed to double a debt level than took well over 200 years to accumulate. Don't expect to see all of these bailout costs included in the official National Debt figures however since the U.S. government engages in more off-balance sheet accounting than Enron ever dreamed of.

While these figures would seem alarming to even a casual observer, many mainstream economists don't find them troubling. Recent Nobel winner Paul Krugman claims the U.S. National Debt could be twice GDP (which would be around $28 trillion if you believe the official overstated GDP figures). How this could be a sustainable debt load for the U.S is hard to fathom, especially since we have a huge stream of social security and medicaid payments coming due in the next couple of decades because of retiring Baby Boomers (there is no money in either of these trust funds by the way, all the funds are used to support current government spending the moment they are received). Economists are also not worrying because over 50% of the bailout costs so far have been structured in the form of a loan. Much of those loans are backed by the truly worthless assets though - apparently the hope that sub-prime borrowers (this time companies) will by some magic pay back their loans still lives on and on in the fantasy land of modern economic belief. While up to now over 95% of bailout costs have been in the form of corporate welfare, expect this to change starting next year with a shift toward more support for individuals.

Although the inflation implications of U.S. government bailout profligacy should be ratcheting government bond yields to record levels, this has not happened yet. A flight to safety among desperate investors had kept U.S. bond yields unusually low (corporate bond yields are at a record spread to treasuries however). The drop in yields combined with the plunge in U.S. stocks has actually caused S&P 500 yields to be greater than 10-year U.S. Treasuries for the first time since 1958. Before that date this relationship was the norm. Don't assume that norm is returning however as some pundits are claiming. Stock yields are being kept artificially high by the bailout programs, which have allowed some companies to fund their dividends with U.S. taxpayer money. Stock dividends are going to come down and U.S. bond yields will eventually go up when they adjust to the inflationary realities of government spending.

Meanwhile, the bailout programs are not nearly at an end yet. As we have said in the New York Investing meetup since the credit crisis began, there is no such thing as one bailout for an insolvent financial firm. No firm has been better than Citigroup in proving this point. After five private bailouts earlier in the year, Citi got $25 billion from TARP and only weeks later had to have a much bigger government cash infusion to stay afloat. The auto makers are in Washington hat in hand at the moment with a low entry level bailout request - expect those costs to keep going up next year as well. And of course, their are more bailouts waiting in the wings.

NEXT: Economic Predictions for 2009

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

When Silence Isn't Golden

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Global terrorism reared it ugly head again with the horrific attacks in Mumbai in the last two days and the foiling of a plot to blow up Long Island railroad trains in New York City. One reason Mumbai seems to have been targeted is that it is the financial capital of India. If they had their way, the forces behind the terrorist threat would establish a totalitarian theocracy that would bring us back both socially and economically to the Middle Ages. It is not surprising that they would want to destroy the symbols of opulence created by capitalism. Unfortunately, the government-financial complex of the world's industrial economies has done more in this regard in the last few years than the terrorists could ever do.

The forces of ignorance though have not been extirpated in the U.S. by any means and I have a personal experience that took place at the same time to confirm this. An economics blog that is part of a well-known 'educational' site quoted an entire paragraph commentary of mine (my name was not mentioned) dealing with how people need to know the truth about the credit crisis and the state of the economy. This economics 'expert' for this site replied to my claims with the assertion that people who make such negative statements and predictions (doesn't matter whether or not they are true apparently) are helping to cause the economic problems the U.S. is experiencing! If markets and democracies can function without people having access to the truth, I am unaware of it. And of course, if you extend this logic, the less bad things the public knows about a company, the better off the investors will be (Enron actually made claims similar to this by the way).

Despite my best efforts at trying to spread reality throughout the land, the recently released U.S. consumer confidence number increased slightly from last months record low. Apparently it was falling energy prices that caused the slight uptick. Consumer views of current conditions however worsened even further in the November report. The October durable goods report didn't help create a rosy picture either. There was a 6.2% plunge following a 3.3% drop in September. On the consumer side, September was the month when purchases of asset backed paper for credit cards literally came to a halt - meaning no ability on the part of the big banks to fund any additional credit card debt to keep the American economy going (hence the sudden change in emphasis for TARP that was announced recently). Year over year delinquencies in credit card payments rose 17% and charge offs 45%.

Investor confidence in the state of the economy seems to have fallen to new lows if you consider that corporate bonds in the U.S and Europe have the highest yield ever relative to government debt. And while Citigroup is busy imploding, it just issued a report on its predictions for the gold market in the next two years. Citi is predicting gold could rise to $2000 an ounce (something New York Investing predicted many months ago). Their reasoning is that all the liquidity being pumped into the financial system is going to be highly inflationary (something New York Investing first said in September 2007). Rumors that China might increase its gold holdings from 600 to 4000 tons in order to help reduce its large dollar holdings (something else New York Investing mentioned as a possibility many months ago) seems to have contributed to Citi's bullish call on gold. All in all a clear pattern seems to be emerging - if only New York Investing would just shut up and stop making predictions, none of these things would happen and everything would just be fine - not!

NEXT: Synchronized Contractions Give Birth to Global Recession

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Geithner's appointment to Treasury - a Golden Opportunity

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The market turnaround last Friday afternoon was reported by the financial media as resulting from the announcement that the head of the New York Fed, Timothy Geithner, would be appointed by President elect Obama as his Treasury Secretary. It would indeed be reasonable for Wall Street to cheer Geithner's appointment and the future team of takover Timothy and bailout Benny. It sent a very clear message that the new administration's policies will be to rescue any and every company needing it. While stocks rallied sharply on this news, the inflation hedges gold and silver rallied even more - and for good reason.

Geithner was the mastermind behind the AIG and Bear Stearns deals. In the case of AIG the company was nationalized by paying 10 times the market price for the U.S. taxpayer's share (if this had been a private deal he would have been sued for malfeasance). Bear Stearns was valued well below market value as a gift to JP Morgan Chase (which has a seat on the New York Fed Board of Directors by the way). Taxpayers just got to guarantee Bear's toxic loans and were left holding the bag. While most news media reported that Geithner was in favor of bailing out Lehman Brothers, this was apparently not the case. People who were on the scene at the negotiations claim otherwise. It is now widely acknowledged that allowing Lehman to fail is what has led to the market turmoil in the last two months. The PR campaign to build up Geithner obviously felt it important to rewrite history and in doing so made it clear that a universal U.S. government bailout policy was in our future.

Despite the momentary trouble that the automakers are having in Washington on getting in on the government gravy train and the failure to bail out Lehman (somewhat similar to the failure of the Fed to bail out the Bank of the United States in 1930, which had disastrous consequences), short of complete nationalization, the U.S. government couldn't do much more to support financial firms other than pump even more money into them (this will indeed be happening). Over the weekend the government guaranteed the most worthless one-sixth of Citigroup's assets. Today, the Fed announced a $600 billion program to support the mortgage market, $100 billion for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (two other financial black holes for government money) and $500 billion to purchase mortgage backed securities. Additionally, the Fed will lend up to $200 billion to the holders of securities backed by various types of consumer loans. So that's another $800 billion just for today. The total in the last year is way into the many trillions and you many assume most if not all of that is freshly printed money.

The implications of these moves have not gone unnoticed in the markets. Inflation sensitive silver rallied more than any stock index on both Friday and Monday. Gold, which has not been terribly damaged in the sell off during the last two months, and beaten down oil also had good rallies. The charts for gold and silver are much healthier looking than those for the major stock indices. Sustainable rallies are possible for both, while stocks look like they will need to do more work to get to that point.

NEXT: A Black (Plague) Friday for Retail

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Citi That Should be Put to Sleep

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

A constant refrain that has been heard from the New York Investing meetup since the Credit Crisis began is "there is no such thing as one bailout for an insolvent financial institution". If there was a poster for credit crisis relief, Citibank's picture would be on it with words underneath, "Can you bail me out? We accept funds from Arab sheiks, sovereign wealth funds, foreign banks, the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, the FDIC, and any welfare program for banks the government can invent - and we take food stamps". As with the daily crashes in the stock market,the bailouts for Citibank have become so common it's easy to lose track of them. From the end of 2007 into the spring of 2008 there were five different bailouts five months in a row. The Fed has pumped substantial amounts into the bank through its various lending facilities. Citi got the biggest chunk of funds from the TARP bill just recently. The 'success' of these efforts came to fruition last week when Citi (C) stock went into a death spiral losing 60% of its value to close at $3.77 (it was over $55 last year).

But not to worry, the U.S. government brain trust that has come up with one ineffective failed program after another to handle the credit crisis put together a bailout package for Citi over the weekend. If they are lucky, this one will work for more than just weeks, but will stabilize things for months before the next rescue package is needed (consider this to be the optimistic scenario). Citi will get another immediate cash infusion of $20 billion from TARP funds. Treasury and the FDIC will guarantee against the "possibility of unusually large losses" on up to $306 billion of risky (a code word for worthless) loans and securities backed by residential and commercial mortgages (please note that commercial mortgages are now collapsing). Citi will assume the first $29 billion in losses on this risky pool of assets. Beyond that amount, the government would absorb 90 percent of the remaining losses, and Citi 10 percent. Money from TARP and funds from the FDIC would cover the government's portion of potential losses (this is deposit insurance money). The Federal Reserve would finance the remaining assets with a loan to Citigroup of freshly printed dollars.

So that this bailout doesn't look like the handout that it is, the U.S. government is getting $7 billion in preferred shares of Citigroup. In addition, Citi will issue warrants to the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC for approximately 254 million shares of the company's common stock (4.5% of the total) at a strike price of $10.61. It is of course possible the Citi stock could hit this level, especially if the U.S. government provides at least $10.61 of funding per share. Citigroup is also barred from paying quarterly dividends to shareholders of more than 1 cent a share for three years (it makes no sense that it should be allowed to pay any dividends, since they are being funded by the U.S. taxpayer). Citi has to additionally take steps to help distressed homeowners.

New York Investing has repeatedly said in its talks in the last year that Citi is too big to fail and the government will bail it out no matter how big a financial black hole it is. This sentiment was echoed in press coverage of the most recent bailout effort with financial commentators saying things such as"If they didn't help, the damage would be beyond imagination" and "It would create chaos [if there hadn't been a bailout]". We have also discussed how Japan followed similar policies with it banks in the 1990s and 2000s. During that time, the Japanese economy has been unable to recover and the stock market has sold off for 18 years. U.S. policy makers will have to come up with a different approach than the one used by the Japanese if they want to avoid this scenario in the U.S. So far, they haven't.

NEXT: Geithner's Appointment to Treasury, A Golden Opportunity

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Five Year Lows are Bad, Eleven Year Lows are Worse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

On Wednesday the Dow hit a five year low. Yesterday the S&P500 broke its key long term support around 775 to hit an eleven year low. The import of this event should not be underestimated. The market sell off that began in the spring of 2000 and which first ended after two and a half years has now been extended to eight and a half years - at least for the S&P500. The Dow and Nasdaq have still not broken their 2002 lows, but the Dow is close to doing so and this would represent another violation of key support that would have ugly implicatons for future stock prices. The Nasdaq is holding well above this support level, but this provides scant comfort considering that that this represents an approximately 78% drop from its 2000 high.

The market statistics for this year alone are already devastating enough. After Thursday's drop the Dow Jones is down 43%, the S&P 500 49% and the Nasdaq 50% in less than eleven months. The S&P's drop matches the one that took two entire years in the crushing market sell off in 1973/74. As of now, it is worse than the 47% drop in 1931 - the year with the biggest drop in stock prices during the Great Depression. All the U.S. indicies had crash level drops once again yesterday, but in an unusal pattern the S&P fell the most with a 6.7% loss and the Nasdaq the least with a 5.1% drop. For the record the closing prices were 7552 on the Dow, 752 on the S&P 500, 1316 on the Nasdaq and 385 on the Russell 2000.

Financial stocks bore the brunt of the selling with Citigroup losing 24% after a 23% loss the day before. Citi closed at 4.71 even after (or possibly because) Saudi prince Al-Waleed said he would raise his stake in the bank back to 5% (this was the amount he has held for many years and if he has to buy to get back to this level, he has obviously been selling recently). Citi announced this morning that it was considering auctioning off the firm in parts or selling itself wholesale. It also requested the SEC ban short selling on its stock again. JP Morgan was damaged almost as much as Citi, with a 18% decline and Bank America did a little better dropping only 14%. GE was down 11%. Morgan Stanley and Goldman fell 10% and 6% respectively. While Goldman did a little better at the close, its intraday low at 49.00 was a much bigger drop. Morgan Stanley fell back into the single digits. So much for TARP, the Wall Street welfare bill, that was supposed to save the financial system from a meltdown.

Wiffs of panic in the financial system were palpable yesterday. The VIX (the volatility index) closed over 80. Interest rates on 3-month T-bills fell to 0.1% in flight to safety buying. A little better than the brief negative interest rate on the 1-month T-bill reached awhile ago, but not by much. Oil continued its relentless decline, falling to $49.42 a barrell. Weekly jobless claims spiked to a 16 year high of 542,000, with continuing claims the highest since 1982 (less than half of employed workers in the U.S. are eligible for unemployment by the way, so you may want to double all numbers to get a more realistic picture of the U.S. employment situation). One market commentator ventured that the current slowdown could be the "worse since the Great Depression". Perhaps he should have used the word than.

NEXT: The Citi that Should be Put to Sleep

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Trader of Last Resort

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Yesterday, a spectacular market rally took place once again. This is the third time in approximately a month that the Dow has had close to a 1000 point intraday rally. The last such rally took place on October 28th and conveniently rallied the market right into election day. That rally fell apart the moment the voting was over, with the market experiencing the biggest two-day back to back price drop since 1987. While the Fed rate cut was allegedly the reason for the late October move up, the motivation for yesterday's out of the blue rally is not immediately evident.

The economic news was bad before the market opened and only got worse during the day. Big caps Intel and Walmart had already lowered earnings expectations. The weekly unemployment report showed a way above expectations 516,000 new claims for unemployment, which matched the post-911 figures when the U.S. economy briefly ground to a halt. Continuing claims hit a level last seen during the deep recessionary early 1980s. Next came the Trade Deficit. Its figures showed that even though there was a drop in imports last month, the drop in exports was even bigger. The drop in the price of oil was a major cause of the import drop, while the export drop seemed to be more the consequence of a declining global economy. The impact of the rising U.S. dollar, already reflected in oil prices seems to have yet to have fully impacted U.S. exports. Expect that it will be doing so in the not too distant future. Finally, the Budget Deficit numbers for October were released and there was a record monthly deficit of $237 billion (actually $662 billion or 55% of GDP if you exclude the money looted from the social security and other trust funds). For fiscal year 2008, which ended on September 30th, the entire yearly deficit was only $455 billion.

It is not surprising in the least that the market sold off on this news and that a rally attempt in the morning failed. By the beginning of the afternoon, the Nasdaq, S&P 500, and the Russell 2000 all hit new yearly lows and the Dow was getting close to doing so. Market stalwarts, like Citigroup, General Electric and Goldman Sachs were in collapse mode, falling to 8.27, 14.58, and 61.02 respectively. The technical picture was breaking down. Suddenly at 1:00 o'clock the market turned around. Was major support hit? No. Was there release of some good news? No. Could things have become much worse if something wasn't done? Yes. Was the PPT involved? In all likelihood.

The quasi-secret Plunge Protection Team (PPT), officially known as the Working Group on Capital Markets, was created by a presidential executive order from Ronald Regan shortly after the 1987 market meltdown. It's purpose was originally to prevent similar crashes in the future. This Regan/Greenspan effort expanded the Fed's role as the lender of last resort to include 'trader of last resort'. It should be assumed that a lot of seemingly illogical trading behavior that has taken place since the credit crisis began can be traced to the efforts of the PPT. Yesterday's rally has many of the earmarks of recent PPT behavior. Timing in the afternoon at 1:00, 2:00, 2:15, 2:30. Rallies starting for no reason or for reasons that are already known. Rallies starting after chart support is broken with the market becoming vulnerable to a much bigger drop. Rallies taking place at politically convenient times. While there are major ethical problems with the government interfering with free-market trading, there is also the problem that it only works short-term. Any PPT generated rally will inevitably lead to lower lows as the Japanese have discovered over time with their government based market interference. Their stock market has taken 18 years so far to hit bottom - and the U.S. may be setting itself up for a similar future.

NEXT: T & A and the GS-20 Summit

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.