The Only Suprise for March Employment Was that it Wasn't Even Worse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

According to the BLS, the U.S. created only 120,000 non-farm jobs in March. The mainstream media cited this figure as a surprise because it was well below expectations. The real surprise was that the number wasn't even worse.

Winter month employment numbers came in at the 200,000 level and this was trumpeted as evidence that the economy was finally gaining steam. There were two problems will this line of reasoning. The first is that the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 jobs a month for the unemployment rate to stay even (this balances the loss of people retiring with new students and legal immigrants entering the job market).  In order to put any serious dent in the massive amount of unemployment that exists the monthly number of jobs being created needs to be well over 200,000. The second problem was the unusually warm weather during the winter that magnified the impact of the seasonal adjustments.

If seasonal adjustments boosted the numbers in January and February, then lower numbers should be expected in the normally warmer spring months. The weak March number seems to be bearing this out. It is interesting to note that the Retail Trade category lost 34,000 jobs in March. This does not support the idea that retail sales have actually been strong as has been claimed, but that the numbers have instead been artificially boosted by inflation. Retail employment is prone to large swings due to seasonal factors.

The official unemployment rate fell to 8.2% from 8.3%. The obvious question is how can this happen if less than 150,000 jobs were created and that's the amount needed for things to remain in equilibrium? It can only occur if more people than expected leave the labor market. This happened again last month  as has been the case during the entire economic "recovery"(millions of people have left the U.S labor market since the Great Recession began). The mass exodus from the labor market creates a huge reservoir of unemployed waiting to reenter the market if conditions actually improve. This reentry could keep the unemployment rate from falling well into the decade.

People of course do not leave the labor market in droves when the economy is on an upswing. The continued shrinkage of the labor market indicates an economic downturn. Don't expect to hear that from either the U.S. government or the cheerleading mainstream media. Politicians don't get reelected by telling the public bad news.

A key question that usually goes unexamined in reporting about the jobs numbers is the high price the U.S. taxpayer and consumer will be paying in the future for the jobs being created today. The U.S. has run deficits of $1.3 trillion or more since 2009. Pumping all of that money into the economy will of course create jobs, but at what cost?  Unless there is a free lunch, that money will have to be paid back either through higher taxes or higher inflation. Both will lead to lower job creation in the coming years.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Non-farmPayrolls -- The Statistical Illusion of Jobs

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Employment Report for December 2011 was released today with a glowing press release from the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics).  The highlight of the report was the 42,000 courier and messengers jobs created last month and the claim that the unemployment rate fell to 8.5%

Statistics can easily be manipulated and it is not unknown for political regimes to do so in order to hold on to power (and 2012 is an election year in the U.S.). After all, it is much easier to change a number than to fix the underlying problem the number represents. Fortunately, the BLS publishes a number of statistical Tables with each monthly report that can be used to check its calculations.

When the Great Recession began in December 2007, the civilian non-institutional population of the United States was 189,993,000. At that time, the number of people in the U.S. labor force was 125,588,000. As of December 2011, the BLS states that the employment population ratio for the U.S. is 58.5% (0.585). The non-institutional population of the U.S. was reported at 193,682,000 or 3,689,000 higher than it was in December 2007. The labor force in December 2007 was 125,334,000 and multiplying the increase in the U.S. population in the intervening four years by the employment population ratio indicates that the labor force should have increased by 2,158,000 to 127,492,000.  However, the BLS reports the U.S. labor force last month was 124,114,000. More than three million people are missing from its figures.

The smaller the labor force is, the better the headline unemployment rate becomes. The BLS claims these three million plus people left the labor force and this justifies purging them from the statistics. There is a problem with their line of reasoning however. Large numbers of people only leave a labor force during periods of severe economic distress.  It does not happen during economic recovery. It does not indicate an employment situation that is improving.  Yet, the BLS produces numbers showing things are getting better when this happens. This violates the first rule of statistics -- the results must reflect reality. The BLS numbers do not.

Dividing the number of employed in December 2011 by the size of the labor force that should exist based on the population numbers produces an unemployment rate of 9.6%, not 8.5%. This is the headline number that should be reported. If the BLS wants to insist however that more than three million people have indeed left the labor force (and this has continued in the last year -- the size of the labor force in December 2011 is smaller than it was in December 2010), it should also make it clear that this indicates that there has been an ongoing recession and no economic recovery has taken place. Both can't happen at the same time, except for a brief period. Either the economic recovery story is a lie or there hasn't been a shrinking labor force. 

While mainstream economists will insist that employment is a lagging indicator (more than two years is some lag), this has only been the case in the U.S. years after statistical "improvements" were introduced in the 1980s and 1990s in how government economic numbers were determined. Before that, employment recovered with improving GDP as should be the case. If you think about it, the term jobless recovery makes as much sense as tall midget or genius moron.

The improvement in the weekly unemployment claims is also being cited as evidence of an improving jobs picture. It would be more accurate to say that it is evidence of a jobs picture than can't continue to get worse. As I have stated since at least mid-2010, the weekly claims number will regress toward the mean (move to its long-term average) because eventually there will be few workers who remain to be laid off. After being elevated for several years, the only way that weekly claims  can now increase is with a big jump in bankruptcies. This will be avoided as long as the economy holds steady.

What is keeping the U.S. economy from getting worse is the unprecedented budget deficits that the U.S. is running. If you spend an extra $1.3 trillion dollars that you don't have as the U.S. did in 2011, this will certainly stimulate the economy in the short-term since much of this money winds up in consumer pockets and they spend it.  According to the non-farm payrolls report for December, the U.S. is not exactly getting good value for this money. Unless of course, you think low-paying courier and messenger jobs should be the cornerstone of the economy.


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
 Organizer, New York Investing meetup
 http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

October Consumer Confidence Well Into Recession Territory

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The October Consumer Confidence number fell to 39.8. It is once again approaching the all-time lows that occurred at the bottom of the Great Recession. The number has never reached the 90 level since 2009, which is the cutoff for a healthy economy. The continually poor levels of consumer confidence  bring into question whether the last recession ever really ended.

While U.S. consumers are gloomy about almost all aspects of the economy, they are most pessimistic about employment prospects. Only 3% of U.S. consumers think that jobs are plentiful. While it is true that this number could have been lower during the 1930s Depression when millions of ordinary Americans went hungry and were homeless, the lowest possible value is only zero. And the current reading could actually be zero since zero lies within the statistical margin of error for the survey. In contrast, those who say jobs are hard to get came in at 47% and that would definitely had been much higher during the 1930s.

The Present Situation Index — how consumers see the state of the economy currently — was a very dismal 26.3 in October. This number has remained at fairly low levels for four years now. What has caused the overall consumer confidence  number to rise has been expectations for a future improvement in the economy. The government and mainstream media has continually told U.S. consumers the economy is getting better and will continue to get better. So, consumers have told the survey takers that don't see things as being in good shape now, but they were hopeful about the future. Consumers are starting to lose hope however. The future expectations number fell from 55.1 in September to 48.7. Apparently, you can only fool the public for so long.

The "don't believe what you see with your own eyes, but believe what the government tells you" efforts are still going strong however. Media reports cited better retail sales and a big stock market rally since early October as indications that the U.S. economic situation is improving. Retail sales may have indeed gone up since they are not adjusted for inflation and higher prices make them look better even if fewer units are being purchased. As for the wild behavior of the stock market, explosive rallies are common in bear markets and not in bull markets. They can also occur at any point because of liquidity injections into the financial system from central bankers in Europe, the UK, and the U.S. as would happen during a banking crisis like the one currently taking place in the EU. They don't last for long however.

No matter how you look at the consumer confidence, the numbers are ugly. They are not just indicating recession, they are shouting recession. Only 11% of Americans think that business conditions are good.  The Present Situations Index has dropped six months in a row. Some of the components are at rock bottom levels. Yet, the government and mainstream media keep reporting that the economy is on track for improved growth in the second half of 2011. How can such diametrically opposed views be reconciled? The simplest way to explain the discrepancy is that someone is lying. Any guesses as to who that might be?


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment Still at Recession Levels in September

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The non-farm payrolls report for September indicated the U.S. economy added 103,000 jobs last month. Mainstream media immediately jumped on the number as proof the U.S. is not in a recession. It indicates no such thing.

While it seems reasonable to assume that employment can't increase at the begging of a recession, this did not happen in December 2007 when the Great Recession began. Total U.S. non-farm payroll employment actually peaked in January 2008 at 137,996,000. It then declined until hitting a low point of 129,246,000 in February 2010, many months after the recession supposedly bottomed in June 2009. Total employment in September 2011 was only 131,334,000, not even remotely close to levels four years earlier. These figures can be viewed at: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/PAYEMS.txt.

The internals of the employment situation for September were not encouraging either. In their press release, the BLS admitted right up front that the end of a strike by the Communication Workers union added 45,000 jobs to the 103,000 total. This leaves only 58,000 jobs being created during the month. More than that amount came from only two sources -- health care and construction. The largest increase in jobs was 41,000 and they were created in the "health care and social assistance" category. Like education, many of these jobs are funded by the government either directly or indirectly, yet they are counted as private sector jobs. The government promulgates this fantasy and the mainstream media mindlessly repeats it.

Another 26,000 jobs somehow came from construction. At least the BLS didn't claim they came from the struggling residential real estate market. Almost all of these new jobs came from the heavy and civil construction category. Perhaps the federal government is building another Hoover Dam and forgot to mention it to the public? This is sort of an eyebrow raising number to say the least.

So in September 2011, there were 6,649,000 less employed people in the U.S. than when the Great Recession began in 2007. This is after over two years of supposed recovery. Based on the recent net increases in the labor force, the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 new jobs a month for the employment situation to just hold steady. To reduce the official unemployment rate of 9.1% would require adding a much larger number of jobs every month. This is not happening. As for whether or not the U.S. is in a recession, an unemployment rate of 9.1% has always indicated a recession in the past. Is there any reason to think "things are different" this time around?

Disclosure: None.

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

BOE Kicks Off New Global Money Printing Cycle

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Markets like money printing. The Bank of England (BOE) today announced its own QE2.  Statments from Fed Chair Ben Bernanke and talk of the EU recapitalizing its banks was already juicing up global stocks before the BOE took this earlier-than-expected action.

In its latest round of quantitative easing, the BOE will be purchasing 75 billion pounds in bonds. While some news reports euphemistically described this action as the BOE will be "spending" the money, the correct phraseology is that it will be "printing" this money. The BOE has previously printed 200 billion pounds to buy bonds starting in 2008 during the first credit crisis. The U.S. Fed has already engaged in two rounds of quantitative easing (only one of many ways that money can be printed) and a third should be expected.

Stocks had already turned around on Tuesday with big rallies. Fed chair Ben Bernanke made a statement that he was willing to do more to help the economy. Bernanke has been "helping" the economy since he started lowering the fed funds rate in September 2007. While he has helped the economy, the U.S. has experienced the worst recession and worst bear market since the Great Depression in the 1930s, the official unemployment numbers have remained close to double digits, the U.S. has had the largest number of bank failures since the Savings and Loan crisis, and thanks to his quantitative easing, the U.S. has been able to run a series of trillion dollar plus budget deficits that are going to lead to serious problems in the future.  Why shouldn't markets rally with more of that in prospect?

In the short term, markets don't care about dire consequences that are somewhere down the road. They rally based on liquidity and money printing provides it for them. While the news that the EU is going to recapitalize its banks sounds positive, there is little if any discussion in any article about where the money is going to come from. For the answer, picture a giant printing press spewing out fresh euro bills at break net speed. Investors should also expect a lot of nationalizations as part of this process. Belgium has just announced it will take over failed bank Dexia (described by the news media as "troubled"). Dexia is the largest bank in the country.

Market volatility is common during credit crises. Investors should expect continued market selloffs interspersed with big rallies. Ultimately, money printing will not save the day however because real value can't be created out of thin air. The day that will happen, is the day that PIIGS will fly. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Consumer Confidence Plunges to Deep Recession Levels

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Conference Board released its August 2011 consumer confidence numbers on Tuesday and they came in at 44.5, down a whopping 15 points from August. A reading over 90 indicates a healthy economy. The last time consumer confidence was that high was in December 2007.

The Consumer Confidence Index wasn't the only measure taken by the Conference Board that was down in their last survey -- the CEO Confidence Index, the Employment Trends Index, and Help Wanted Online Index were also lower. CEO confidence was down 12 points in the second quarter (before the budget ceiling negotiations became a heated issue).

Consumer confidence levels indicate that the U.S. has been in a continual recession since the beginning of 2008. The economic "recovery" that has supposedly taken place according to government reports  has not been corroborated  by this independent measure. After falling to 25.3 -- an all-time record low -- in February 2009, the index has so far peaked at 72.0 in February 2011. It was over 140.0 in 2000. The current August reading of 44.5 is lower than the worst readings from the 1980, 1981-82, 1990-91 and the 2001 recessions. So conditions are not seen as being as good during the current "recovery" as they were at the bottom of the last four recessions. 

What has been moving the confidence numbers up and down since the Great Recession began is the Expectations Index -- how consumers see the economy in the future. This is influenced by news flow and after a continuing barrage of media propaganda pumping up the prospects of the economy, this number rises. Every now and then though another crisis rears its ugly head and the Expectations Index plunges back to where it should be. It fell to 51.9 in August from 74.9 in July. The fight over the budget ceiling and the stock market drop in early August likely brought it back down to realistic levels.

What has hardly budged since the depths of the Credit Crisis is the Present Situation Index - how consumers see things right now. This was at 27.5 in February 2009 when consumer confidence was the lowest ever recorded. It was at 33.3 this August, two and a half years later. If the economy had truly recovered, this number should be over 90.  Instead, it's at rock bottom levels. Apparently, consumers can be fooled into thinking the economy will be better in the future, but not about their current experiences.

As soon as the dismal consumer confidence numbers were released, the media economic spin machine went into action to try to explain why they weren't so bad after all even though they looked really horrible. They dredged up numbers showing 47% of consumers plan on taking a vacation (or put another way --a majority of consumers can't afford to take a vacation)  and that more consumers plan on buying cars and appliances in the future. Not necessarily in the immediate future of course. This is probably going to happen after all the improvements in the economy take place -- the ones they keep reading about in the papers and seeing on the nightly news.

 Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bernanke in a Hole in Jackson as Wall Street Evacuates

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Fed Chair Ben Bernanke gave his much awaited speech at Jackson Hole friday morning saying little of substance and less of note. Hours later, but only after the market had a chance to rally, New York City Mayor Bloomberg ordered a mandatory evacuation on the low-lying areas of New York City including Wall Street itself.

The mainstream press couldn't wait to trump up Bernanke's empty clichés and pump up the stock market. Before Bernanke started his speech the market started dropping and the Dow Industrials were down 220 points while he was speaking. Within two hours, the Dow had rallied almost 400 points from its bottom. Such huge market moves in a short period of time indicate an unhealthy market. When stocks bend too much, they eventually break.

What was the great revelation from the Fed Chairs speech? It was "the U.S. is headed for long-term economic growth". Another brilliant insight from the man that said subprime mortgages wouldn't cause any significant problem up to one month before they began torpedoing the stock market and the economy. Bernanke also failed to stop the worst bear market and recession since the Great Depression in the 1930s and let the world financial system fall off a cliff because he failed to understand what would happen if Lehman Brothers failed. But like the dim-witted son of a third world dictator, the press still slavishly talks him up after each ill-fated move.

Just as a barely subdued economic panic impacts America's main sreet communities, New York is on edge because of Hurricane Irene. Food stores and the transportation hubs are mobbed. People in low lying areas have been ordered to evacuate just before the authorities are closing down the subway system and commuter railroads -- the only way out for many New York residents. Another example of government action at its best. That Wall Street itself is in danger of being flooded just after more wisdom from Chairman Ben is an irony that should not go unappreciated.   


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Economists Don't See The Recession That Has Already Started

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

A just released survey of 43 mainstream economists polled this month by the AP pegs the chances of the U.S. falling into recession in the next year at only 26% (one in four). As a group, the economists predict the economy will expand by over 2% in the second half of the year. Other news that appeared with the survey results included an article about how food stamp use in the U.S. is skyrocketing - a highly unlikely occurrence during an economic recovery.

When deciding how much credence should be given to the current recession view of the economics profession, investors should consider how accurately they predicted the Great Recession - the worst one since the 1930s. The recession began in December 2007. That same month a survey of 54 mainstream economist was published by Business Week under the title, "A Slower But Steady Economy" (AP could have used the same title for its current survey). How many of these highly-paid top economists realized that the U.S. was in recession?  None, zero, nada, zilch. How many thought that the U.S. was about to experience the worst recession in almost 80 years? None, zero, nada, zilch.
Unless you have reason to believe that establishment economists have been regularly taking handfuls of smart pills in the last three years, it's unlikely that their views are any more accurate today.

Instead of listening to the miss-opinion of mainstream economists constantly being shoveled out by the mainstream media, investors would be wise to look at the hard evidence of what is actually taking place in the economy.  Approximately 46 million Americans (15% of the population) are on food stamps. The number has increased by 74% since 2007. One wonders how big the increase would have been without the economic "recovery" that has supposedly taken place. Many of the people who receive food stamps are employed part-time and sometimes full-time in low paying jobs. If so, they are not part of the unemployment statistics and are considered successful examples of the U.S. pulling itself out of recession.  

Of course having a large part of the country on food-aid is an expensive proposition. How exactly has the U.S. paid for this?  Well, one way is through the approximately $2 trillion in money that the Federal Reserve has printed since 2007. Two trillion dollars of phony money can really juice up an economy. Without it, the GDP would still be in a deep hole from its 2007 levels and the illusion of  economic recovery wouldn't exist. If it turns there's no free lunch after all, the U.S. is going to be hit with a very big inflation bill in the future. Don't expect Fed Chair Ben Bernanke to see this coming though. After all, the Fed remained oblivious to the Great Recession long after it had started. Even in the spring of 2008, their meeting notes indicate that they were still hopeful about avoiding the recession that had begun months before.  

Investors should expect an ongoing stream of articles in the next several weeks or even months about how the U.S. is not going to experience another recession. The stock market is sending a very different message though and even the fluffed up economic statistics the government produces are likely to  look a bit anemic this fall. But don't worry, establishment economists are optimistic as they always are when a recession begins.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security. Investing is risky and if you don't think you are capable of doing it yourself, seek professional advice.

September Jobs Report Indicates Economy Dead in the Water

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


September was the 15th month with the U.S. unemployment rate was at or above 9.5%.  The underemployment rate, which includes forced part-time and some discouraged workers, rose to 17.1%. While the Great Recession supposedly ended in June 2009, well over a year later the employment figures have still failed to show any significant improvement.

Private sector hiring was tepid to say the least in September. While the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) claims that there were 64,000 private sector jobs added last month, only two categories dominated hiring - 'leisure and hospitality' and 'health care and social services'. Leisure and hospitality, which includes drinking establishments, added 38,000 jobs. It is perfectly understandable why people would want to drink more considering the state of the economy.  Health care and social services (the mainstream media always leaves out the social services part), which is the only category that continually added jobs during the recession, added 32,000 jobs. Why social service jobs are counted as private sector jobs is a of course a mystery known only to the BLS. Education jobs are also counted as private sector, even though most of them are paid for with taxpayer money. Many health care jobs are of course also government funded.

Government jobs actually counted as government jobs dropped 159,000 in September. Almost half of this was accounted for by a loss of 77,000 Census positions. Considering the Census was supposedly finished months ago, this leads to the obvious question: What have these people been doing since then? Another 76,000 jobs were lost by local government. The Obama administration's February 2009 stimulus package provided a lot of funding for localities to pay for police, fireman and teachers. This funding seems to already be running out. What will happen in 2011, when the stimulus money has been completely spent?

The economic establishment has told us that the U.S. economy has had four quarters of recovery so far and we have already in the fifth. Employment hasn't shown any recovery however. Up to now, the claim have been that this is because employment is a lagging indicator (something that only showed up in the 1990s after a number of 'adjustments' had been made to how GDP and the inflation figures were calculated). The employment lag has already been several quarters and it now looks like it is heading for several years.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

August Beige Book Admits Economy Heading Down

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Fed just released its Beige Book summarizing U.S. economic conditions up to the end of August and the takeaway was "widespread signs of a deceleration compared with preceding periods". In general though the report was a mastery of double-speak and attempted obfuscation.

The Beige Book is a compilation of anecdotal reports on various sectors of the economy from the Fed's twelve regional districts (Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas and San Francisco). The Fed uses it as an additional source of information when determining economic policy. If they trust the numbers produced by the U.S. government statistical agencies, it's not clear however why it's necessary to produce this monthly study.

The Beige Book for August seemed particularly strained in its attempt to put some rosy spin on its findings. This was most evident in the section on Consumer Spending and Tourism. The opening sentence was positive and gave the picture of a slow growth economy (the story the Fed is trying to sell to the voting public):

"Reports on consumer spending were mixed but suggested a slight increase on balance. Most Districts reported that non-automotive retail sales rose compared with the previous reporting period or were above their levels from 12 months earlier."

The details that followed however indicated that consumers throughout the country were acting as they do during a recession:

"Atlanta reported a decline in the level of sales, and Richmond noted that sales "sputtered" in August, while New York and Dallas reported that growth in retail sales slowed. Several Districts noted an emphasis on necessities and lower-priced goods. Boston reported that back-to-school purchases were focused on immediate needs; in Cleveland, consumers focused on "value-priced seasonal items;" and in St. Louis, Kansas City, and San Francisco, sales were relatively stronger for lower-priced items."

Interestingly, the report goes on with a positive view of auto sales, even though they fell by 21% year over year in August and 5% on a monthly basis according to industry source Autodata:

"Most Districts also reported that sales of new automobiles and light trucks were largely stable or up slightly during the reporting period."

The Beige Book's authors would have provided a more accurate description of the state of the U.S. economy in August 2010 if they simply stated the following:

"Consumer spending was reported to be slow in most Districts, with purchasing concentrated on necessary items and retrenchment in discretionary spending. Districts reporting on auto sales described them as falling or steady at low levels."

This would have made their work much easier as well, since this is a statement from the Beige Book for August 2008.  That report was issued just before the U.S. economy fell off a cliff.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

July Durable Goods Add Support to Recession View

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


After an existing home sales report yesterday revealed that the U.S. housing market is currently in worse shape than it was at the bottom of the Credit Crisis/Great Recession, July's durable goods report today further confirmed that the U.S. economy is sinking into a recession.

The headline number, an increase of 0.3%, seemed OK if not particularly good. Only a single item, a huge 76% increase in commercial aircraft sales, was responsible for keeping the number above zero however. Durable goods orders ex transportation fell 3.8% in July. The transportation number, particularly the aircraft sales component, is highly volatile. A strong number one month can be followed by a very negative number the next month. As for the rest of the components of the report, some were eyepoppingly bad.

Machinery orders, which fell 15%, were the weakest number in the report. It wasn't just the extent of the drop that made it so awful, but more importantly it was the biggest decline on record. Yes, the drop was larger than the decline that took place at the bottom of the Credit Crisis/Great Recession when the U.S. economy was falling off a cliff. Computer orders were down 12.7%. Capital goods orders were down 8.0%, the biggest drop since January 2009, just after the Credit Crisis/Great Recession bottom. Orders for electrical equipment and appliances were down 5.9%.

Altogether, July durable goods orders indicate that the manufacturing sector of the U.S. economy is rapidly turning south. This is particularly troubling because it was manufacturing that had the biggest upturn in the last year (the four times larger service sector didn't improve nearly as much). What will provide economic growth, now that manufacturing is weakening? An even more important question is: If some of the manufacturing numbers are as bad as or worse than the bottom of the Credit Crisis/Great Recession and this is also true of the real estate market, how is it possible that the U.S. economy is not currently in another recession?

Disclosure: No positions

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Existing Home Sales Collapse in July

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Existing home sales plunged a record 27% in July, falling to the lowest level in 15 years. Inventories of unsold homes rose by an even greater 40% and were at their highest point in over a decade. A spokesman for real estate industry group NAR described the market's disastrous performance, which took place in every region of the country, as a "pause".

Once again analysts missed the number by a mile, being far too optimistic. Predictions were for a drop of 14%, a pretty bad figure in and of itself, but little more than half the actual result. The severe drop was also well telegraphed by a 30% decrease in pending home sales in May. Pending home sales tend to turn into existing home sales around two months later. May pending home sales dropped because of the expiration of the federal government's home buying tax credit on April 30th. It is now quite obvious that all this credit accomplished was to motivate people who were already going to buy a new home to do so sooner rather than later and it didn't create any additional sales. Just another example of how the federal government is wasting tax payer money on ineffective stimulus programs.

The most amazing thing about July's existing home sales is that they were worse than anything that took place during the bottom of the Great Recession when the U.S. economy was shrinking at more than a 6% annual rate. Even at the bleakest point, existing home sales were around the 4.5 million level. This July they fall to a 3.8 million annualized rate. Moreover the drop from June was severe in every region of the United States - down 23% in the South, down 25% in the West, down 30% in the Northeast and down 35% in the Midwest.  At the same time, inventories of unsold homes rose from 8.9 months supply in June to 12.5 months in July. Year over year, July 2010 home sales were down 26% from July 2009. Despite the across the board collapse in demand, median home prices somehow defied the fundamental laws of economics and rose 0.7% to $182,600.

There are three important messages from the July existing home sales numbers. First, the housing market has not yet hit bottom and it could be a long time before this takes place. Secondly, the numerous government programs to stimulate the housing market- and this includes driving mortgage rates to record lows - have failed to make things better. Third, if the housing market is in worse shape than at the bottom of the Great Recession, then we are either already in another recession or about to enter one.

Disclosure: No positions

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Five Recessions the Fed Failed to Predict

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Federal Reserve is confident that a double-dip recession won't be taking place. One of the major forecasting tools they use to determine this is yield curve analysis. This approach has never really worked and can't possibly work in a ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) environment.

According to their yield curve model, the Fed is predicting there is only a 10% chance of a recession in the near future. Before breathing a sigh of relief, investors should ask themselves how well this model has worked in the past. Here are the relevant questions and answers:

Did the model accurately predict the 2007-09 recession, the worst since the Great Depression?  Well, no it didn't.

Did the model accurately predict the 2001 recession? Err, well no it didn't do that either.

Did the model accurately predict the 1990-91 recession? Well, it missed that one as well.

Did the model predict the huge downturn in 1973-75?  Well no, it failed then too.

Did the model predict the 1969-70 downturn?  No, that was another one it missed. 

The only time the model predicted a greater than 50% chance (and it was only a little above 50%, so the prediction was basically no better than tossing a coin) of a recession was for the 1980 and the 1981-82 recessions. This had nothing to do with the double dip nature of those recessions, but was a factor of the high interest rate environment that made it possible for short-term interest rates to be higher than long-term rates. It is quite obvious that the higher interest rates are, the better this model works. The model in fact can't work at all when short-term rates are close to zero as they are now. In such circumstances, the yield curve can't invert because nominal long-term interest rates would have to be negative - an impossibility. So with our current low interest rates, the Fed model will never predict a recession.

As usual when the economy is falling apart, the Fed is making its usual positive comments of how things are really in good shape and the public should ignore all the reality-based signs of trouble. Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher was on CNBC on Wednesday and stated with confidence, "while the recovery has slowed, it is unlikely the U.S. will fall back into recession". The Fed was also very confident of avoiding the Great Recession as well and continued to say so long after the recession had begun.

Disclosure: No positions

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.