Has the Rally Begun for Gold, Silver and the Miners?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Gold, silver and their mining stocks have been meandering sideways for months, but it looks like the early stage of a rally has begun. Confirmation of a sustainable uptrend hasn't taken place yet and that is the point when it's a good idea to be fully invested. There is enough reason to start accumulating a position however.

The technical picture for the monetary metals and their mining ETFs on the daily charts brightened considerably on Monday and Tuesday. While this was true for a number of indicators, investors should pay closest attention to the DMI (Directional Market Indicator). This flashed a buy signal for ETF GDX, which represents the senior gold and silver mining stocks. GDXJ, the junior mining stock ETF, and the silver ETF SLV were all on the verge of doing the same on Tuesday. The ETF GLD was positively positioned for a short-term rally, but will not be able to give this signal until rallying for several more days. In any move up or down in gold and silver, it would make sense for the mining stocks to move first.
















While the bullish picture isn't complete just yet on the daily charts, more work needs to be done on the weekly charts. A buy signal on these longer-term charts is the confirmation of a longer-term rally that investors would like to see. This could happen in a week or two and should be followed closely.

There is one other major missing piece for a completely bullish picture and that is the position of the moving averages. GLD, SLV, GDX and GDXJ are all in bearish patterns with the 50-day simple moving average being below the 200-day (or the 10-week is below the 40-week). The prices for all of these ETFs have moved above the 50-day and are heading for the 200-day. That resistance needs to be broken next, and then the 50-day average needs to move above the 200-day. This will take some time for the miners, but possibly very little time for GLD. Probably before this moving average cross takes place, prices will rise above the 65-week (or 325-day) moving averages. Moving and staying above this level should be interpreted as the rally is here to stay and that everything else will fall into place.

The major risk to an ongoing rally in the precious metal sector is the situation in Europe. A major drop in the euro could be bearish because this will cause the U.S. dollar to rise and gold and the dollar usually move in opposite directions. There are times however when they both move together. The risk to the global financial system caused by a euro breakdown could be one of them.

In the very long term, both gold and silver are in secular bull markets that began in 2001. This secular bull is likely to last around 20 years  and could be with us for up to 25. The biggest part of the move in secular bulls is usually in the last few years. We are still in the early stages of this rally.


Disclosure: Accumulating long positions in gold, silver and mining ETFs. 


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Technical Look at Gold and Silver at the End of 2011

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While gold and silver are in long-term secular bull markets, they have experienced price weakness in the last few months of 2011. The technical picture indicates that they are likely to remain pressured for a while longer before recovering in 2012.

GLD (the major ETF for gold)  fell below its 200-day simple moving average earlier in December and at the time, I pointed out in a previous article that this indicated lower prices in the future and it would next fall to the 325-day. After bouncing back up to the 200-day, gold did indeed fall to 148 on December 29th, which was the 325-day moving average. At the time that gold was breaking its 200-day, the DMI (directional moving indicator) also gave a sell signal on the daily charts. The RSI (relative strength index) fell below 50 and MACD (moving average convergence divergence) below the zero line -- both bearish. The sell signal on the DMI does not seem to be exhausted just yet.

The moving average picture overall still indicates that gold is in a short-term bull market. For this to turn negative, the 50-day would have to fall below the 200-day moving average and even then it shouldn't be considered as serious unless it was confirmed by a cross below the 325-day. The gives gold a lot of room to fall, even if the chart remains bullish. Even though a short rally in the beginning of 2012 is indeed possible, lower prices are likely to follow. A break of the 325-day moving average should be considered significant and would next bring GLD down to the 140 level. The 40-month simple moving average however is the most solid support below the 325-day. 

Silver shows greater weakness than gold on its charts with the selling much more advanced. Unlike gold, silver has hit new yearly lows and when this happens the first time, it is likely that a series of  new lows will then be made, although short rallies frequently take place first.  For SLV, the major silver ETF, the 50-day moving average already fell below the 200-day in October and the bearish pattern was confirmed when the 50-day then fell below the 325-day at the end of November.  On the daily charts, the DMI is on a sell signal and this seems to be only halfway done at this point. The other technical indicators are also bearish. SLV is currently being held up by support around 26. Much stronger support exists around 21 (really a band of support between 18 and 21).

The recent drops in gold and silver should be considered to be buying opportunities, although investors with a longer-term horizon should not be pushing the buy button just yet. The charts do not indicate a definitive bottom has been put in, nor that this is likely to happen in the next few weeks. Secular bull markets tend to last for around 20 years and this indicates the ultimate high for gold and silver will be around 2020. While there is always a higher high in the future during secular bulls that doesn't mean that there aren't major reversals along the way. The stock market secular bull between 1982 and 2000 had the 1987 crash, the 1989 and 1997 flash crashes, the 1990/91 bear market and the 1998 bear market. Smart investors used these declines as buying opportunities and made lots of money when they did. The same will be true for gold and silver for the rest of this decade. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Updating the Definition of a Bear Market

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While there is a lot of talk about the S&P 500 being in a bear market because it fell 20% from its high, this definition is not particularly useful to traders or investors. The focus should be on whether or not the market is trending down and will continue to do so. A market having fallen by so much, regardless of what the amount chosen is, does not provide that information.

The term bear market dates backs to at least the 18th century and was in common use on Wall Street in the 19th. All calculations were done by hand back then and changes in prices were all traders had to go on. Just as is the case today, much of trading took place based on momentum. Traders assumed that if the market was going down, it would continue to do so and vice versa. At some point a 20% drop became the rule of thumb that a drop was serious and likely to continue. While 20% certainly indicates a  major fall in prices, the markets may or may not continue to fall after that level is reached.

A much better approach, the concept of moving averages and the idea of using them as trading guidelines didn't develop until the twentieth century. The 50-day and 200-day moving averages became the standard benchmarks for determining bullish and bearish patterns. This approach could only be widely implemented after computers became generally available. A bear pattern was established when the price fell below and remained below the 200-day moving average (the price would be trading at or below the 50-day as well). The bear would be confirmed when the 50-day moving average crossed the 200-day from above and moved below it. This is nowadays referred to with the dramatic term "death cross".  This generally takes place before a market has lost 20% of its value.

The so called death cross took place for all the major U.S. indices in August and for many this confirmed that stocks were in a bear market. The 50-day, 200-day cross is prone to failure however. It tends to give too many false signals, as was the case in the summer of 2010 when all major U.S. indices also made this cross and then reversed shortly thereafter. Not only was there no bear market, but a major rally followed.

Instead of using the 50-day and 200-day moving averages as benchmarks, a more accurate bear market
reading can be obtained from using the 50-day and 325-day moving averages (or 10-week and 65-week moving averages).  While this will provide a bear market confirmation later, it will be more accurate when it does so. It takes a lot of selling energy to drive the 50-day moving average below the 325-day and if the market can't accomplish this, a real bear market doesn't exist.  Although this provides a later sell signal, it provides an earlier buy signal on the way back up.

The S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 made the 50-day, 325-day cross in mid-September, but had already made the 10-week, 65-week cross by the beginning of the month.  The Dow industrials and the Nasdaq made the daily cross at the end of September, but had already had a cross on the weekly charts by the middle of the month. Based on the weekly charts, the S&P was already in a bear market for a month before the 20% intraday drop took place on October 4th.

Investors and traders need not rely on just moving averages to find out whether or not a bear or bull market exists. Volatility can provide an important additional clue. The daily price swings for stocks in the summer of 2010 were relatively minor compared to those in August 2011. Volatility is bearish for markets and its presence recently is just another confirmation of a serious and prolonged downturn.

Modern technical analysis also provides a whole bag of tricks to help determine if a bear or bull market exists. The DMI (directional movement indicator) is the most directly applicable. Investors want to look for a  clear sell signal with a rising trend line on the DMI  on the weekly charts (the daily charts are too "noisy"). A sell signal was given in late July on the S&P 500, the Russell 2000 and the Dow Industrials. The trend line has been going up since then indicating a strengthening downtrend. A sell signal appeared in August for Nasdaq. It then failed, but a new sell signal was given in September.

There is more than enough reason to believe that U.S. stocks are in a bear market regardless of what percentage drop has taken place. Moving averages, volatility and technical indicators are all indicating that a bear market started in the U.S. somewhere between late July and mid-September 2011. This bear will not end until the 10-week moving averages cross back above their respective 65-week moving averages, volatility calms down, and DMI buy signals are given on the weekly charts.  

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Problem With Volume for the New Rally

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


One of the most talked about aspects of the stock market rally that began in March 2009 was the lack of volume support. As the market continued to go up, buying continued to dry up. The rally that began on Monday is exhibiting this behavior to an extreme. Lack of volume support now makes stocks vulnerable to another sudden downturn.

The problem with volume is most evident on the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Around the low last March, the index was trading over 600 million shares a day. Within the last two months, there were many days when volume was frequently below 200 million shares. During 2010, there have been a few volume spikes around 400 million shares, but almost all of these took place on options expiration days. Rising volume on those days doesn't indicate increased investor interest in the market.  Volume finally did perk up considerably at the end of last week though - on big selling.  Over 400 million shares were traded on the Dow on both Thursday and Friday.

Buyers have not been as enthusiastic on the upside however. The volume on the big rally on Monday was around 300 million shares, much less than volume on the two preceding down days. The Dow dropped slightly on Tuesday and volume was somewhat over 200 million shares. In and of itself this was OK since you want to see lower volume on down days.  When the market goes up afterwards though, the volume must also rise.  This didn't happen on Wednesday, despite the 150 point rally. Volume was well below 200 million shares until the close when around 30 million shares traded at the end of the day. Despite all of those shares changing hands, stock prices barely budged. This would indicate equal amounts of buying and selling (also known as stalling or churning). Final volume on Wednesday came in at 195 million shares. So there was a big rally on pathetic volume.

Not only is the rally lacking proper volume support, but the Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq all bounced off their 200-day moving averages on Thursday (they actually pierced them for a short period) and they have now traded back up to their 50-day moving averages. This is now a key resistance level. So far, this is a normal bear-trading pattern.  For it to turn into a bull pattern, the stock indices must get above and stay above the 50-day moving averages. We should soon find out if this can happen.

Disclosure: None relevant

Daryl Montgomery Organizer,
New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Agricultural Commodity Prices Weaken on Ample Supplies

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The USDA report on March 31st was bearish for grains. Wheat, soybeans, corn and rice all had significant drops in their last day of the quarter trading. Agriculture commodities have been weak since they peaked in 2008 and a sustainable rally in the immediate future is extremely unlikely.

Food commodities had big rallies starting in 2007 and these lasted into the spring of 2008, when most prices hit their highs. At the top, wheat was over $13 a bushel, soybeans over $16, corn around $7.50, and rough rice around $25.00.  Significant selling followed in later 2008 and into the summer of 2009. A late year rally from last year has now faded. Wheat closed out the first quarter at $4.505, down 21.5 cents or 4.6% on the day. Soybeans were at $9.41, down 33 cents or 3.4% and corn for May delivery closed at $3.45 down 9.5 cents or 2.7%. Rough rice was the least damaged dropping 24.5 cents or 2.0% to $12.215.

The USDA report didn't actually appear to be that negative. U.S. farmers will be planting 9% less wheat in 2010, although winter wheat plantings from last fall were 2% greater than they were initially thought to have been. The soybean crop should only be 1% larger than last year and corn 3%. In a bear market, news tends to be looked at with a negative bias though and there is overreaction to the downside. Agricultural ETFs with significant grain exposure, such as DBA, RJA, and GRU are all trading in bear market patterns with the 50-day moving average trading below the 200-day moving average. The cross just took place for RJA.

While the short-term picture for the grains appears negative, in the long-term prices will go up again. The ability to increase global food production is limited. There is little additional land that can be opened for cultivation and the big yield increases from the Green revolution - use of cross breeding to produce sturdier and more productive plants, the introducion of nitrogen based fertilizers, and extensive applications of pesticides, fungicides, and herbicides - are in the past. Population continues to grow though and the ability to produce more food isn't keeping up. At the same time, improved economies in emerging markets means a greater demand for food from large numbers of the underfed. The basic realities of supply and demand will eventually cause food prices to go back to their 2008 highs and probably much higher. The charts will tell us when this is likely to happen.

Disclosure: None

NEXT:  March Employment Numbers Better Thanks to Government Hiring

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Is the Gold Correction Over?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Gold has had a sharp sell-off that has took it down over $100 in four trading days from December 3rd to the 8th. The rally that began in early October took spot gold up $200 from the breakout point of $1025 to a high of $1226. Approximately 50% of that was lost by the afternoon of December 8th in New York Globex trading. The $1125 level was tested again the next evening at 2AM New York time in Hong Kong trading. A 50% drop is a key Fibonacci retracement for rallies and a common place where counter moves stop. The next Fibonacci support level would be around $1100 for spot gold if the $1125 level doesn't hold.

Other technical considerations necessitated spot gold's drop to at least the $1125 level. GLD, the largest gold ETF, had a gap on its chart just above the $110 level (it represents one-tenth of an ounce of gold and it trades at a slight discount to the spot price). That gap got filled on Tuesday. It is very common for price to trade down to the bottom of a gap, so this move was not unexpected. GLD then bounced off its 30-day simple moving average. It slightly pierced the 50 RSI level, something it also did in its last sell-off. The 50 level should be acting as support. Only a few trading days previously GLD was overbought on the RSI on the daily charts and this condition was mostly resolved on Friday, December 4th in only one day of trading. GLD was also overbought on the weekly RSI and this is also now mostly resolved, but it looks like a few weeks of back-and-fill sideways trading will still be necessary.

While sharp corrections are unnerving to investors, they are common in strong bull markets. The bigger picture is still very positive for gold and for silver. Not only is there no technical damage on the daily charts, GLD is on a buy signal on both the weekly (intermediate-term) and the monthly charts (longer-term) and so is SLV, the major silver ETF. When in doubt, investors should always consult longer term charts for guidance and remember that in bull markets, pull-backs are opportunities for buying.

When contemplating what to do in a sell-off during a rally, investors should also ask themselves if any important negative major changes are taking place. For the moment, the answer to that is no for gold. Are governments going to stop their super easy money policies or budget-busting stimulus plans? Don't hold your breath. Just yesterday both the U.S. and Japan both announced new stimulus plans. Just today, the U.S. announced that the TARP program would be extended to October 2010. The proverbial government printing presses are still in 24-7 operation and will be for some time. Gold investors will be one the prime beneficiaries of these policy moves.

Disclosure: Long gold and silver

NEXT: The Common Roots of Hyperinflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

First Four Trading Days Review

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The message from the markets has been quite clear in the last four trading days. The big money is negative and taking its money out. All indices had significant drops today, leaving the first of the quarter indicator highly negative. Technicals deteriorated even further. About the only thing that was up today was the U.S. dollar, although bonds rallied after today's auction was over. The dollar and bonds should be tanking big time. Oil went down even more and the reason for its decline, natural gas and other commodities has now become clear.

The Dow closed down 161 points today, even further below its 50-day and 200-day moving averages. The 50-day is below the 200-day and both are declining, a typical bear pattern. Nasdaq, the strongest of the averages pierced its 50-day today, closing down 41 points. The S&P fell 18 points and broke and closed below its 200-day today after breaking below its 50-day last Thursday. The Russell 2000 fell 10 points and managed to hold just above its 200-day. All and all, a pretty ugly situation.

Light Sweet crude closed at 62.93, but was even lower during the day. Oil has dropped 12% since last Wednesday. While the media is claiming its because it was overpriced and the economy is bad, this is not the reason (as usual, if the press reports it, you should first assume the explanation is wrong). What has happened is CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) says it wants to crack down on rampant speculation in the energy markets, by imposing position limits for commodities of finite supply (which is every commodity). The commission is planning hearings and is also considering raising margin requirements. One of the major implications of this proposal is that ETFs will have quotas imposed on them. The big money players presumably had the news before the public and shorted into it. Will the CTFC investigate this? Don't hold your breath. The people who are supposed to be stopped from speculating are the small investors like yourself, not the big insiders.

A quote from the CFTC news, "The government's use of free markets via auctions to help find prices for hard-to-sell assets in the financial sector shows how adept supply and demand are at setting values. But when it comes to commodities that people, industries, economies and nations depend on, the susceptibility of free markets to manipulation can prove dangerous". Free markets are indeed dangerous to a government that doesn't like the prices they set because it continually overinflates its currency. So we must save the free markets by destroying them! Huh???

It is interesting that this attempt to control rampant speculation in oil is taking place one year exactly after oil peaked at $147 a barrel and while it is now trading in the 60s. Something doesn't seem to make sense with this picture. This move is effectively an attempt to create price controls on commodities (by a government that is constantly telling us that there is deflation and a big risk of prices falling). The only things price controls are effective in creating is big shortages and black markets. They ultimately cause prices to go higher than they would have. When you can't get any gas for your car two years from now you'll at least know why.

NEXT: Commodity Shortage Disaster in the Making

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Short Term, the Market is Looking Better

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While nothing has changed in the long term outlook for the U.S. stock market, the shorter term picture brightened from a technical perspective somewhat on Friday. Bear market rallies can come out of nowhere and can be highly profitable. They should not be avoided as is currently being advised by the never-made-a-dime-trading 'pundits' who are now pompously announcing 'the long-term trend hasn't changed'. This would be hard to argue with. However it is in the short term that you make quick money.

Examining many charts, you will find a common pattern of almost vertical drops without much or any relief rallies. These drops have gone on for 6 months or more (a common maximum period for selling). The trend has gone sideways for the last two months or so. If you look at moving averages you will see that they have become bunched together on the daily charts. Even looking at these charts for a brief period, it is sometimes impossible to differentiate the 10-day, 20-day, 30-day, etc. moving averages. Bollinger Bands have become very narrow. The tight moving averages and narrow Bollinger Bands frequently precede trend changes.

The Nasdaq is leading the other U.S. stock indices. On Thursday it closed above its bundle of moving averages on the daily chart and then rallied strongly on Friday to the top of its Bollinger Band. Similar behavior took place in early January and Nasdaq traded above the Bollinger Band for one day. That breakout failed however. While the RSI and MACD looked good at that time, the down trend pattern of the DMI was not quite resolved at that point. Things look better now and the moving averages are more tightly intertwined . There is still no guarantee of a rally yet though. The price needs to either ride upward with a rising Bollinger Band or jump above it. The moving averages need to start rising with the 10-day on top, the 20-day just underneath it, the 30-day just underneath that, etc. When the moving averages are all together as they are now even a short rally will start to create this pattern.

The other thing to pay attention to is that there were two major pieces of bad economic news lately - the GDP report and the Jobs Report. The Market rallied both days. When the market does this, the bad news has already been priced in. This doesn't necessarily mean a big rally is coming, but the downside risk during those times is actually relatively low and the upside potential is very high. In addition to the tech stock laden Nasdaq, oil, coal, and non-precious metals are starting to look interesting. The first thing you should be looking for before buying is a close above the 50-day moving average. You also always need to keep in mind that you need to take your profits when you get them.

NEXT: The Slippery Slope of Oil Media Coverage

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.