Inconsistencies of the Economic 'Recovery'

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

What created the Credit Crisis and the current 20 month recession (the longest since World War II) was the collapse in price of all the worthless real estate paper the was issued during the bubble years. As this blog mentioned yesterday, this problem has recently gotten 'better' because the accounting rules that determine the value this paper were changed. While playing make-believe is appropriate for five year old children, it's not a good idea for running financial system and just leads to bigger disasters later on.

The support for the real estate 'recovery' is thin to say the least. U.S. house prices supposedly went up during the last three months. This occurred even though home loans are hard to get and U.S. wages and salaries were down 4.7% year over year in June. This was the largest drop since records began in 1960. Employment is also down. As was mentioned last Friday, the unemployment rate dropped by 0.1% because a large number of people left the labor force. No matter how you look at it fewer people have a job. So who are these people who are paying higher prices for houses and what banks are lending them the money? All in all is seems highly unlikely that house prices could actually be going up given such conditions. If not, this set of numbers wouldn't be the only ones that have been altered recently to make them look better.

The other inconsistency in the real estate is getting better is that this was a drag on the big banks and brokers earnings in the second quarter. Many of them were increasing loan loss provisions. Fannie Mae, whose business is purely real estate related, illustrates the current state of affairs quite clearly. Fannie Mae lost $14.8 billion in the second quarter. Provisions for credit losses were $18.8 billion. The company stated in its earnings "We are experiencing increases in delinquency and default rates for our entire guaranty book of business, including on loans with fewer risk layers."In other words, all types of loans are going down the tubes including the prime ones. Total non-performing loans increased to $171 billion in the second quarter. They were up from $149.9 billion in the first quarter of this year and that was up from $119.2 billion in the last quarter of 2008. Well, that certainly looks like a recovery pattern, doesn't it?

Fannie Mae has requested an additional $10.7 billion from the U.S. Treasury to keep afloat. That it can get by this quarter with only an additional $10.7 billion cash infusion from the government seems optimistic. The company is essentially a bottomless pit for bailout funds. Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's criteria for non-performing loans were changed around the beginning of the Credit Crisis to make it more difficult for a loan to be considered non-performing. Even with this fantasy, things still are getting worse. Somehow reality always seems to always get in the way of the government's best plans.

NEXT: More on the Real Estate 'Recovery'

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Smoking Gun of the Economic Recovery Scam

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The Economic recovery that is supposedly taking place has been carefully arranged by the U.S. government. Unfortunately, the 'recovery' will be far more evident in the published statistics than in the economy itself. After all, it is a lot easier to change the numbers that to actually fix the economy. Apparently, the hope is that with enough cheer leading, businesses and the public will get on the bandwagon and start spending again. I can picture Bernanke, Geithner and Obama clicking their heels together and trying to wish hard enough to make it so.

The AIG earnings report came in as positive as expected on Friday. How did a company that is beyond bankrupt manage to show positive earnings? The key statement in the report about what happened was "resulting from the adoption of new accounting guidelines". These new guidelines were set by the U.S. government and probably benefited every big bank and brokerage house as well, most of which had surprisingly good earnings - even though their lending operations (the core business of any bank) were continuing to deteriorate during the quarter. So the mystery has been solved. If your earnings are disastrous, just change the accounting rules and like waving a magic wand, suddenly you're earning gobs of money. Happy days are here again!

If you want to know how well this approach works, you can take a look at Enron and GM. Enron's earnings were phony for years and then it imploded overnight. GM changed its accounting in the mid-2000s after the recession and suddenly one quarter it was earning big bucks instead of losing big bucks. To its credit, CNBC News actually reported that the big 'improvement' was merely an accounting gimmick. The stock still rallied strongly on the news (so much for the Efficient Market Hypothesis). Even though the government started pouring money into GM starting in 2007, it still went bankrupt in 2009. Now the government is supporting it to the tune of $4500 per car with the Cash for Clunkers program. Reports out today predict that autos are going to be the next big recovery area of the economy, improving both the industrial production numbers (which fell at a depression level 19% in the first quarter) and retail sales (which went up in May and June because of higher gas prices - they're not adjusted for inflation).

If the government pours huge amounts of money into any industry, the numbers will of course improve. This doesn't indicate economic recovery though, even though it is being sold that way. Will the government keep doing this every quarter? It may have to in order to keep the 'recovery' going. If you want to know how well that approach works, see Weimar Germany and Zimbabwe.

NEXT: Inconsistencies of the Economic 'Recovery'

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Non-Farm Payrolls and Its 'Statistical Quirks'

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

When deciding how credible this mornings jobs reports is, you only have to look at one number. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment in the auto industry went UP by 28,000 last month. Nobody believes this, and I mean nobody, not even the biggest government boot licking financial reporters. Even the mainstream media cautioned that this could be a 'statistical quirk', the polite term in the numbers industry for lying. You should assume that finding one 'statistical quirk' in a report is similar to finding one roach in your apartment. In both cases, there's a lot more that you're not seeing.

The headline number for the report was a loss of 247,000 jobs, which is bad enough as is. July was the 19th consecutive month for job losses. Since the recession has began in December 2007, the government admits that 6.7 million jobs have been lost. Goods-producing industries shed 128,000 jobs, and service-producing industries cut 119,000 jobs, including 44,000 in retail and 38,000 in professional and business services. Unemployment in retail (the largest individual private sector employer) seems to be accelerating. After the 'robust' auto industry gains, health care was the biggest job gainer. Government also added about 7 thousand jobs, but this information was left out of the BLS press release even though it is always reported (when information that has always been available suddenly disappears watch out).

According to the government, the unemployment rate declined to 9.4% (actually 16.3% if you include discouraged workers and involuntary temp workers). You may ask how is it possible for there to be a significant job loss and for unemployment to improve at the same time (could it be another 'statistical quirk')? It's simple - 422,000 people 'conveniently' left the labor force. Even though the O'bama, Bernanke, and Geithner and the BLS in its press release tell us that the economy is improving, large numbers of people are giving up looking for jobs because they think there is no chance of finding one. Somehow, I don't think both of these contradictory views are possible. One of them seems to be a lie - pardon me, I meant 'statistical quirk'.

If you listen carefully to what Obama and Bernanke have been saying for the last several months, you will notice that 'things are getting less worse' is the gist of their statements. The Obama litany is: the financial meltdown has ended (which happened during the Bush administration, but he still takes credit for it), the rate of job loss is slowing, and the stock market is doing better. Bernanke also concentrates on the stock market is getting better theme (and I am sure this is not taking place without some government assistance). The recession is indeed getting 'less worse', although not as much as the government claims. There is also a huge gaping chasm between getting less worse and getting better. However, the government may be able to solve this problem in the future with bigger 'statistical quirks'.

NEXT: The Smoking Gun of the Economic Recovery Scam

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Latest from Fantasy Land

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

AIG was up as much as 66% yesterday on rumors that it would show a profit for last quarter when it reports its earnings this Friday. For those of you who may not remember, AIG is the derivatives poster child for the Credit Crisis. It was nationalized by the U.S. government, which purchased 80% of its stock and grossly overpaid for it. It was of course impossible not to overpay since the actual value of the stock was well below zero. The feds have had to continue to pour money into AIG to keep it afloat and any 'profit' it shows would be the result of the U.S. government putting more money into the company than it is losing. Now that's a great business model. What investor wouldn't want to get a piece of that action?

Just consider AIG another example of how the economy is 'recovering'. The AP wire service published a piece this weekend about how U.S. real estate prices have bottomed and the market is turning up. According to AP, the crisis is OVER and happy days are here again. Interestingly in the same article, AP projected that U.S. unemployment would be increasing until well into 2010 - just the type of situation that prevents people from buying homes and banks from lending to them. Foreclosures are up too and that of course doesn't create a drag on the housing market. The increase in foreclosures is even worse in Great Britain, although house prices are supposedly going up there as well. The 'recovery' is going so great that the Bank of England announced a big increase in their quantitative easing (aka money printing) program this morning. Yeah, things are really going great when you have to fund government spending with money created out of thin air.

As pathetic as British government finances are, and they are indeed quite pathetic, the pound still has managed to rally against the U.S. dollar during the last two months. What does this say about the market's view of U.S. government finances and our much acclaimed economic 'recovery'? The recovery wasn't looking so good yesterday when the ISM service index came out. It FELL from 47.0 in June to 46.4 in July (anything under 50 is contraction). While the manufacturing index was above 48 (still in contraction), the service component of the U.S. economy is much bigger than the manufacturing component - and it's not doing well. Also not doing well are retail sales (consumer spending is approximately 70% of the economy). Most chain store sales were strongly negative. So the economy is 'recovering', but this doesn't include any of its major components.

The trade-weighted dollar declined again yesterday, making it three days in a row that it has been below it break down price of 78.33. Gold sold off slightly. Oil tanked on the weekly EIA storage report, but then managed to close higher. Mainstream media reported this took place because of dollar weakness. One financial service also had an article that said gold went down because the dollar had been strong in the morning (I missed that). I commented on their website that these two articles were contradictory and this looked like some form of manipulation of the news. That comment was censored - just like much of mainstream financial news reporting.

NEXT: Non-Farm Payrolls and Its Statistical Quirks

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold Shining, Silver Lustrous

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Gold traded as high as $970 in the futures markets yesterday. It is once again getting close to that magic $1000 level. Silver traded as high as $14.73, well above important resistance of $14.50. Meanwhile, the trade-weight U.S. dollar closed at 77.77. Tuesday was the second day below its breakdown level of 78.33. So far this morning it's trading lower.

A basic idea in technical analysis is that if a resistance point is tested enough, it will eventually be broken. Gold's all time high so far is $1032.70 set in European trading in March 2008. It broke 1000 again this February. It almost got back to 1000 again in early June. The end of the year starting in August is when gold is strongest seasonally. So, things look promising for the breakout from 1000 at some point fairly soon. A breakout after several tests is usually very bullish.

The fly in the ointment is of course the U.S. dollar. The key 78.33 level is the low during the late 1980s, early 1990s sell off. It was THE low for the trade-weighted dollar until it was broken in September 2007. The new low established after that sell off was under 72 when the dollar made a multi-month low between March and July 2008. While this is major support, there is some lesser support at 76.00. If gold is knocked down from the 1000 area again, that is where the dollar is likely to be trading when this happens.

In the long-term silver will do even better than gold. First though it has to break resistance as 16.00, which is bounced down from in the last rally and then it will head toward 21.00. Silver is both a monetary metal and an industrial metal. Economic recovery will increase demand (silver has been in a chronic shortage situation on and off for years as is). Inflationary worries will also increase demand. While silver ultimately outperforms gold, gold always moves first. Watch the yellow metal closely in the next few weeks.

NEXT: The Latest From Fantasy Land

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Dollar Break Downs

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The trade-weighted dollar closed below its break down point of 78.33 yesterday. Intraday the dollar traded as low as 77.45 and it closed at 77.57. As has been the pattern for months now, everything else rallied as the dollar sold off. While stocks continued their long move up and the S&P 500 reached 1000 (a major resistance point), commodities were the star players in the rally. The CRB index, a broad basket of commodities, was up 3.48%. The ISM manufacturing Report supposedly set off the rally.

According to the media, the promise of economic revival was responsible for the big commodity rally. So what commodity is doing best recently? Sugar! - which was trading at a three year high yesterday. Sugar is not economically sensitive at all (people don't go into sugar eating frenzies when a recession ends), but is instead a strong mover in the early stages of inflation. The biggest winner on the day was natural gas (the chart is very bullish and UNG closed above the 50-day moving average), with the near term futures contract up 10%. Copper, which is perhaps the most economically sensitive of all commodities was up 4.4%. Copper, zinc, lead and nickle are all trading at 10-month highs. Aluminum is at an 8-month high.

The rallies in gold and silver, which are the commodities most sensitive to movements in the U.S. dollar, were somewhat muted. Gold was as high as $963 intraday. A report released yesterday stated that net sales of gold by central banks fell to 39 metric tons during the first half of this year. This was down 73% from last year. If total sales for the year come in under 140 metric tons (highly likely), they will be the lowest in decades. Central bank gold selling was a major factor keeping gold prices low in the 1980s and 1990s and it looks like it is now completely exhausted.

As for the ISM report PMI came in at 48.9 (under 50 means contraction). This was above expectations and a few components were up decently, including production, new orders, and prices paid -which is an indication of inflation. Inventories were the most negative component of the report and they have been contracting for 39 months so far. According to the ISM, six industries are now expanding - Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Paper Products; Printing & Related Support Activities; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Transportation Equipment; and Chemical Products.

As I have stated many times in this blog, economic revival is going to mean a lot of inflation.
The dollar break down is an indication of this and the powers that be are going to have to do something soon to try to hold up the dollar. My guess is that this will happen when gold hits the $1000 area. This is the inflation marquee for the economically savvy. The Fed can deny that inflation exists all it wants, but if gold soars past 1000, only the naive and gullible will listen. Since there is usually a lot of buying pressure for gold in August, the next few weeks should be interesting.

NEXT: Gold Shining, Silver Lustrous

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Critical Juncture for Dollar and Stocks

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The dollar began to break down on Friday. Intraday, it fell below the critical 78.33 support level, but managed to close at 78.38. It is hovering just above 78.00 this morning. The next few days should tell whether or not it is making a bottom or just falls apart. This is probably just as important for the stock market because the dollar and stocks have been moving almost perfectly inversely to each other since early March when the dollar peaked and stocks bottomed. A dollar rally should mean a sell off in the stock market.

The close and opposite relationship of the price movements of the dollar and stocks is unusual. The 1990s bull market took place while the dollar was rising, not falling. The same was the case for most of the 1982 to 1987 stock rally. So most of the long secular bull market from 1982 to 2000 was accompanied by a rising dollar. Much of the secular bear market rally that took place between 2002 and 2007 was accompanied by a falling dollar. The dollar dropping to new all-time lows in September 2007 because of the Fed's rate cutting campaign is what finally killed the rally.

A new dollar stock pattern seems to have begun last November when the dollar had a peak and stocks (and a few commodities) made a bottom. The initial relationship was quite jerky however and only smoothed out starting in March. Stocks going up and the dollar going down indicates a trade where people who go long stocks, short the dollar. Only the big banks, brokers and hedge funds are capable of engaging in this trade. It's not mom and pop investor. If the U.S. government is not going to let the dollar break down, this trade is going to have to reverse and stocks are likely to suffer.

While an inverse relationship between stocks and the dollar has taken place, this usual relationship for the dollar and gold has broken down. Gold peaked in late February and the sold off with the dollar until mid-April. It then rallied in early June and sold off again with the dollar until early July. This pattern makes no sense whatsoever. If the dollar rises, there is no reason the decoupling can't continue. August is usually gold's strongest month and gold acted very positively to Friday's GDP Report while the dollar had a vicious sell off. The reaction was so extreme that it looked like dollar traders actually read the report.

NEXT: Dollar Breaks Down

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.