How Much Stimulus Will Be Done by China, the EU and UK?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Much weaker than expected trade data out of China on Friday indicates more economic stimulus will be forthcoming there soon.  Even bigger stimulus is expected from the ECB as it revs up the printing presses to bail out Spain and Italy (unless Germany stops it of course). According to a recent released report, the recessionary economy in the UK may need massive doses of quantitative easing to recover.

Exports in China rose by only 1% year over year in July and this was well below forecasts of an increase of 8.6%. Imports were up 4.7%. For a country that has an export-based economy like China does, this is a serious problem. Like the U.S., Europe and Japan, China engaged in a massive amount of stimulus during the Credit Crisis in 2008/2009, spending $586 billion or 14 percent of its GDP in addition to cutting interest rates and lowering banking reserves.  This led to a big expansion of local government debt, a major housing bubble that has yet to burst and consumer inflation. Apparently, there are unfortunate side effects when governments apply a lot of economic stimulus (notice you rarely read about them in the mainstream media).
This time around, China has already cut interest rates twice and reserve requirement ratios for banks three times since November. Its economy has slowed for the last six quarters and probably by much more than official figures indicate (China's economic numbers should be taken with a grain of salt).
China is still in spectacular shape though compared to Japan, which had a massive trade deficit in the first half of 2012. Japan has been economically troubled for 22 years and despite zero percent interest rates and an unending number of stimulus measures its economy remains in the doldrums. While all the stimulus hasn't solved Japan's economic problems, it has led to a debt to GDP ratio of over 200% (worse than Greece's).
One reason China's exports are doing so poorly is the weakening economy in Europe. On Thursday, the ECB cut its growth forecasts and is now predicting the eurozone economy will contract by 0.3% in 2012.  They are still hopeful of slight growth in 2013 however. Maybe they think it will come from all the money they plan on printing to bail out Spain and Italy. The Eurozone is basically tapped out from all the bailouts it has already done in Greece, Portugal, and Ireland (Cyprus and banks in Spain are now on the list as well). Greece needs a third bailout and is struggling to make it through the month until it receives its next welfare payment in September. The situation there is potentially explosive. The IMF has stated Ireland will need another bailout by next spring.
When ECB President Draghi said on July 9th that the central bank will take any measures within its mandate to save the euro, the inevitable conclusion was that he was willing to engage in massive money printing. The amount of money needed for the huge bailouts that Spain and Italy would require simply doesn't exist so it has to be created out of thin air. The Draghi proposal is for the ECB to buy bonds, but the ECB has already tried buying bonds under the SMP program.  The moment the buying stopped, interest rates shot right back up. This approach is costly and only effective in the very short term — a typical government program. It won't prevent the Eurozone's failure, it will merely delay it and make it worse when it happens.
The UK is not part of the Eurozone, but its economy is also contracting. Citigroup economists have stated that the UK will need to print an additional £500 billion and lower interest rates to 0.25% to prevent continued stagnation. Apparently, they don't think there are serious risks if this approach is taken. Neither did the Weimar Germans in the early 1920s, the Zimbabweans in the 2000s, the Chinese in the 1940s, the Brazilians for most of the 20th century, the Yugoslavians in the 1990s or the Hungarians in 1946. In fact, countries that create hyperinflation always claim the risks of money printing are minimal before it takes place. And there are usually a large number of top economists that support this view.  

There are serious structural problems in the major economies today. The usual Keynesian quick fixes that have been applied since World War II no longer seem to work, nor will they. These have led to a world drowning in debt and all debtors eventually reach their borrowing limit. When this happens with countries, they then try to print their way to prosperity. History makes it quite clear that this doesn't work either. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Weekly Claims and Trade Deficit Not as Good as Reported

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Stocks reacted enthusiastically to the weekly unemployment claims for the week ending September 3rd and to the improvement in the U.S. trade deficit during July. As usual, the mainstream media hyped up the headline number, but 'forgot' to report some important details.

Weekly claims falling the week before or during a major holiday is a hardly unusual and has nothing to do with an improving employment picture. The 451,000 number reported for the week before Labor Day was the lowest number since the week that contained the July 4th holiday. The problem is not that unemployment offices are closed, but the bureaucrats that tabulate the statistics can't work faster to produce the numbers in a timely fashion. In this report, apparently 9 states didn't have their numbers ready, so two of them estimated their numbers and the BLS estimated the numbers for the other seven. This information doesn't appear to have been included in the intitial press release from the BLS. Some bloggers caught on to it though and Bank of America sent out a note later about what had happened.  Stocks in both the U.S. and overseas rallied on the BLS release showing an improving jobs situation based on incomplete data.

The market was also excited about the trade deficit decreasing in July. While no trade deficit is definitely a good thing (something that hasn't occurred in the U.S. since the 1970s), this is not necessarily true for a lower trade deficit. If the trade deficit is decreasing because of surging exports, that is indeed a positive. If it is decreasing because of a big decline in imports, this can indicate business and consumers are spending less because of poor economic conditions. Falling imports accounted for most of the July decrease. Of the increase in exports, capital goods accounted for 82%. This is surprising considering the July durable goods report showed a significant decline in production of capital goods in the U.S. If exports are surging for capital goods, why is production falling?  There seems to be some contradiction here.

The stock market shouldn't have been happy with either of these government reports. Without the positive spin the mainstream media gave them, it probably wouldn't have been. The truth is that weekly unemployment claims have been continually at recession levels for over two years now and there is no evidence yet of their improvement (even a one week drop below the 400,000 recession level, quite possible before the election on November 2nd, wouldn't mean employment is on an upswing). As for the trade deficit, it was cut in half during the Credit Crisis because the economy was collapsing. An improving trade deficit can actually be sending a negative message. Investors need to know the details and the historical context of any given economic report before they can react appropriately to it. Lots of luck in getting that from the mainstream media.


Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Q2 GDP Much Lower Because of June Trade Deficit

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The U.S. trade deficit widened to $49.9 billion in June instead of improving as expected. This figure was missing from the second quarter GDP report and could mean a downward revision to 1.3% from the originally reported 2.4%. The lower GDP number means almost all of the growth in Q2 came from inventory accumulation and not from increased economic activity.

The U.S. trade deficit has to be funded from foreign borrowing, just like the budget deficit. Before the Credit Crisis, both used to be around the same size. Then the budget deficit exploded from record levels around $400 billion to over $1.4 trillion in 2009. The trade deficit went in the other direction, decreasing substantially, but is now coming back. The deficit in June was 19% higher than in May and would be almost $600 billion annualized. Exports fell, with computers and telecommunications equipment declining. Imports rose with consumer goods hitting a record high. Ironically, this is being made possible by the huge budget deficit the federal government is running. U.S. consumers are using the money they get from stimulus spending to buy foreign goods - something that will only lower U.S. economic growth.

The trade deficit reducing the GDP number for the second quarter has far wider implications than growth just being anemic. It confirms that the economic 'recovery' that supposedly started in the summer of 2009 has been based almost entirely on changes in inventories. From the Q3 of 2009 to Q1 of 2010, around two-thirds of the growth reported came from the inventory category. This fell to 44% in the first reading of this year's Q2 GDP, still a high number, but better than the 71% from Q1. If Q2 is revised down to 1.3%, the 1.05% that inventory contributed to GDP would represent 81% of total growth. Excessive inventory accumulation means lower GDP growth or even drops in future quarters.

Stocks turned ugly yesterday, whether because of the implications that growth was much weaker in Q2 than the originally reported number or because the realities of the Fed's August meeting finally sank in, is not clear. The Dow Industrials were down 265 points or 2.5%, the S&P 500 lost 32 points or 2.9%, Nasdaq dropped 69 point or 3.1% and the small cap Russell 2000 fell 26 points or 4.1%. Market weakness continued this morning and stocks are starting to suffer serious technical damage, which could lead to much bigger drops in the coming weeks ahead.

A just released NBC/Wall Street Journal survey indicates that close to two-thirds of the American public think that the economy is going to get worse before it gets better. Mainstream economists now think GDP growth will be 2.5% in the second half of the year. The Fed still thinks it will be above 3%. For months, both have denied the possibility of a double-dip recession. Increasingly negative economic reports however indicate another recession may have already arrived.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

8 More Reasons Why a Double-Dip is Coming

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


As earnings season continues and one company after another beats expectations, the economic numbers are continuing to come in below estimates. The data and indicators are increasingly painting a picture of an economy that is falling apart. Here are a few of the reasons why another recession is imminent:

1. U.S. orders for durable goods fell 1.0% in June. Economists expected them to rise 1.0%.  Excluding the volatile transportation sector, orders fell 0.6% and shipments were down 1.3%. Inventories rose for the sixth month in a row, indicating goods are being produced, but they're not moving out the door.

2. Industrial output in China fell 2.8% in June. A "potential weakening of the global economy" was cited as the cause.

3. The ECRI (Economic Cycle Research Institute) weekly leading indicators index has fallen as low as minus 10.5. There has never been a case when it has gotten this low and there hasn't been a recession.

4. The Consumer Metrics Institute's Growth Index has been negative since January and is now around minus 3.0 (it fell to around minus 6.0 in August 2008). It leads U.S. GDP by approximately two quarters.

5. The U.S. trade deficit widened in May and was the largest in 18 months. This happened even though oil imports fell over 9%. Rising oil imports are usually the factor that makes the trade deficit go up. The trade deficit subtracts from GDP.

6. After a sharp drop in June, U.S. consumer confidence fell even more in July. The Conference Board's latest reading was 50.4. As usual, economist's estimates were on the high side. A reading of 90 or above indicates a robust economy. Before the most recent recession, consumer spending was 72% of GDP.

7. U.S. weekly unemployment claims refuse to drop below 400,000, the approximate dividing line between recession and non-recession. At no point during the current 'recovery' have they gotten that low. The unadjusted number of claims for the week of July 17th was 498,000. Even though companies are reporting huge earnings increases and raising estimates for next quarter, more and more workers continue to lose their jobs.

8. The economic cheerleader-in-chief, Fed Chair Ben Bernanke, gave a gloomy report on the U.S. economy last week in his bi-annual testimony before congress. Bernanke didn't see the subprime crisis coming, nor did he realize the U.S. was in a recession in the spring of 2008, months after the recession had begun. So if even he admits the economy is weak, it must really be in bad shape. Bank of England Governor Mervyn King, has also recently stated, "Britain can't be confident that a sustained recovery is under way".

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A GDP Canary in the Inflation Coal Mine

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Singapore recently reported that its 2010 first quarter GDP increased by a whopping 32.1%. While a huge growth rate like this would be OK for an emerging market in its earliest stage of growth, Singapore is already an advanced economy. China, which is behind Singapore on the development curve, saw a GDP expansion of 11.9% in the beginning of this year and inflation is already starting to show up there.

While countries are always trying to increase their GDP growth rates, this is one of those areas where the proverbial 'too much of a good thing' can lead to trouble. There is a desirable band of GDP growth for every economy. Too little is not enough to keep the population employed and happy, too much creates more demand for resources than available supply and this causes inflation. The desirable level of economic growth for the U.S. is generally believed to be around 3% a year. It can be much higher for an emerging market.

Singapore is a trading economy and its current huge growth is an indication of how much Asian trade is picking up. It's first quarter GDP was a record increase. The central bank just began raising interest rates to tighten credit. Singapore also boosted its inflation forecast to the 2.5% to 3.5% level as a result of its GDP numbers. It will indeed be lucky if it can keep its inflation rate that low.

China's consumer prices were up 2.5% in March. China's economy grew by 8.7% in 2009, while the U.S. and EU economies stagnated. China is now arguably the second largest economy in the world and if it hasn't already moved ahead of Japan, it will do so very soon.  Almost half a trillion dollars in stimulus in a $4.9 trillion economy can be credited for maintaining China's spectacular growth rate. Stimulus creates inflation as well as growth though. The growth numbers were all very high for the first quarter. Retail sales were up 19.6%. Fixed asset investment was up 25.6%. Exports were up 29%. China, like most Asian economies has based its economic expansion model on export growth.

Not everyone in the world can be a net exporter however. Someone has to be buying those exported goods and that someone is the United States. The U.S. trade deficit widened by 7.4% in February (this subtracts from U.S. GDP and requires borrowing from foreign sources in order to fund it) and the deficit with China widened. The U.S. trade deficit is going up again because imports are rising faster than exports. The media reported that Wall Street economists were surprised. Apparently having a PhD in economics doesn't mean you can grasp the concept that increased exports from one country lead to increased imports in another. Many of these same economists also say there will be no inflation in the U.S. even though the government is engaged in substantial money printing.

Disclosure: Not relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why Inflation Is and Will Be a Problem

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

In December 2008, I predicted at the New York Investing meetup that inflation would reappear in the U.S. by the end of this year. The just released PPI report for November had wholesale prices up 1.8% (a 21.6% rate annualized). Year over year PPI was up 2.4%, the first positive reading in a number of months. The CPI report for November had prices up 0.4%. Year over year was up 1.8%. I made last year's prediction that inflation would be turning just about now based on another prediction that oil prices would be much higher today than they were in late 2008. Both government reports cited higher energy prices as the main driver of the uptick in inflation.

As would be expected, many mainstream economists (who as group significantly underestimated the PPI number) and Fed Chair Bernanke quickly told the public not to worry. They argue that this has to be just a temporary blip because inflation can't have a sustained rise unless the economy is expanding strongly. They point out that the most recent U.S. capacity utilization rate is 71.3% and claim that inflation can only become a problem if this number is over 80%. The capacity utilization argument might have some validity if the U.S. was a self-sustained economy that didn't engage in trade (something I refer to as a non real-world condition). The U.S. not only engages in trade though, but imports much more than it exports. The country has run a trade deficit with the rest of the world continually since the 1970s. One thing that we import a lot of is oil. Like almost all commodities (natural gas is the exception), the price of oil is set globally. The U.S. capacity utilization rate has only an indirect and minor impact on oil and other commodity prices. The error that many mainstream economists have made in their thinking is that the U.S. inflation rate is controlled by conditions that exist solely within the U.S. In actuality, markets outside the U.S. are the key determinant of the how much inflation American consumers experience.

The capacity utilization argument can also be debunked through historical analysis. Not only have there been cases of major inflation in countries with low capacity utilization, but this condition invariably accompanies hyperinflation. The most extreme example of this took place in the last few years in Zimbabwe. The unemployment rate there rose to 94%. With almost the entire nation not working, presumably capacity utilization was as low as it possibly could get under any circumstance. According to many mainstream economists and the U.S. Fed, Zimbabwe couldn't possibly have had inflation. Instead, it had sextillion percent inflation, the second highest rate ever recorded.

While capacity utilization is a red herring when analyzing inflation, currency policy is not.Commodity prices are affected by the strength of the U.S. dollar since all commodities are priced in dollars. A weaker dollar means higher commodity prices and higher inflation in the U.S. This is merely a specific example of a declining currency being the actual correct definition of inflation. Central bank easy money policy with excessive government borrowing backed up by money-printing is what causes a currency to decline.

Many economists refuse to accept that the declining value of a currency is the root cause of inflation though. When not using the capacity utilization argument, inflation-denying economists and other Fed apologists resort to defining inflation as a rise in credit and deflation as a drop in credit. Like capacity utilization, this viewpoint doesn't stand up to real world analysis either. For this to be true, there would have to be ever increasing amounts of credit in real terms in hyperinflationary environments. Not only does this not happen, but credit availability tends to implode during hyperinflation - the exact opposite of what would be predicted. The one thing that all hyperinflations do have in common though is excess money-printing.

Inflation is not a new phenomenon. There have been hundreds of inflationary episodes over time. The one thing they all have in common is that there is too much money (currency actually) for the size of the economy. Central banks in most major economies are currently engaging in excess money creation with abandon. At the same time, they are telling the public not to worry because things will be different this time. They also said that last time and the time before by the way.

Disclosure: Long gold.

NEXT: U.S. Plays Shell Game with Bailout Money

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Cash From Clunk-Heads Program

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. Cash for Clunkers program seems to be working quite well in reviving the economy - not the U.S. economy, but the Japanese economy. The U.S. government program that uses taxpayer money to let people who foolishly bought gas-guzzling cars trade them in for newer energy efficient models is just another reward the losers, from the losers Credit Crisis program. Yesterday's trade deficit figures tell the story. The July deficit widened by a whopping 16.3% in one month. The reason for this huge increase? Auto and auto part imports increased by 21.5%.

A widening trade deficit is negative for GDP. Yesterday's figures knock down one of the three pillars of economic recovery that mainstream economists have cited for their prediction that the U.S. recession is over (almost 100% agree that the economy is recovering). Actually, they specifically said exports were increasing, which indeed was the case in yesterday's report (thanks to highly volatile civilian aircraft shipments). Unfortunately, imports increased much more. Even though this subtracts from GDP, the press managed to put a positive spin on it. One well known economist stated "This was a positive report in that it provides further evidence that both the U.S. and foreign economies are coming back." Something that makes GDP decline is good news for the U.S. economy? Since when? There is obviously no absurdity that the mainstream media won't publish.

Of course the stock market went up on this 'good' news. Cash for Clunkers is indeed reviving manufacturing activity within the U.S (manufacturing is only 20% of the commercial economy versus 80% for services). You can see the figures have improved the most in industries related to automobiles. What one hand giveth, the other is taking away however (as seems typical of Obama administration initiatives). Toyota and Honda have been the two biggest beneficiaries of the program. Once the program stops though, you can expect manufacturing to decline again until the U.S. government comes up with another stimulus program (and another ... and another). The third pillar of the economic recovery, rising homes sales and prices, is just not believable. Foreclosures keep rising, housing inventory keeps rising, consumer credit and income keep falling, yet people are rushing to buy homes and paying more for them? It's only likely in the fantasy land known as manipulated statistics.

The U.S. is not the only country engaging in economic stimulus, it's a global phenomenon (the British also have something they call a 'Car Scrappage Scheme' by the way - at least they used the word scheme so people know what is actually going on). The Chinese market had a big rally last night after China said industrial output, investment, loans and retail sales remained strong in August, "supported by colossal stimulus measures" (a quote from one of the news services). The world's economies seem to be following the Japanese model. In the last two decades, Japan tried to repeatedly revive its economy through stimulus programs. In some cases, quarterly GDP growth exceeded 10% on an annual basis (an enormous number). However, every time the stimulus was removed, the economy sooner or later sank back into recession. There is one major difference however. Japan entered its stimulus period in a strong financial condition, whereas the U.S. and Britain were extremely overextended at the beginning of the Credit Crisis. Our stimulus plans will have to be paid for by printing money.

NEXT: Gold Closes at Record High

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Trade Deficit - There's Good News and Bad News

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. Trade Deficit dropped by a whopping 29% in November, one of the biggest drops in history, if not the biggest. Much of the 'improvement' was accounted for by price changes in imports (the numbers are not adjusted for inflation or deflation as is the case for most U.S. government economic reports) Nevertheless, both imports and exports declined significantly, indicating a shrinking global economy. Imports of course dropped much more than exports and this took place because of falling oil prices.

Oil prices (the U.S. is a major oil importer) have the biggest influence by far in determining the U.S. Trade Deficit. The trade deficit overall dropped 29% and oil imports dropped by a similar amount. Based on the average price for a barrel of oil used in the report, oil prices dropped 27% during the month, although the report itself states that 'petroleum prices' fell 32%. Imports of industrial supplies, the category in the report that includes petroleum products and natural gas, fell by 25%. Based on these figures it looks like a little less oil is being consumed by the U.S., but not much. Almost the entire change is merely a change in pricing.

On the flip side of the equation, imports were also falling in November, but that decline seems somewhat more related to an actual drop in trade than a drop in prices. U.S. exports of industrial supplies, capital goods, autos, consumer goods, and food and feed all fell. The one significant rise was in the aircraft category, which jumped 7.1%. This was caused by a strike in Boeing ending and should be assumed to be a one-time event. Drops in imports and exports of services were approximately equivalent.

The average price of a barrel of oil used for the November report was $66.72 a barrel and oil has fallen much lower since then. 'Improvements' in the U.S. Trade Deficit are likely for the next few months because of this. As the price of oil gets to its cost of production, the 'improvements' will disappear however. When the price of oil rises again, the 'improvements' will reverse. The drop in U.S. exports is actually the much bigger story. It was a collapse in U.S. exports that was a key marker of the Great Depression in the 1930s.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Inflation Versus Deflation Argument - Part 4

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

While it is true that the U.S. experienced consumer price deflation in the 1930s and Japan did so in the 1990s and both experienced sharp drops in bank credit, there are few if any other similarities to the current situation in the United States in 2008. The situation in the 1930s U.S. and 1990s Japan is also a bit more nuanced that the deflationists would have you believe. In the late 1920s, the U.S. did see a big rise in money supply and credit, just as occurred in the U.S. in the early 2000s. According to the deflationists, this should have resulted in rising U.S. consumer prices at some point. It did not. Prices actually fell between 1926 and 1929. A similar thing happened in Japan in 1986. While consumer price deflation did appear in Japan after its banking system literally fell apart, it didn't show up consistently until 1999, nine years after the Japanese asset bubble began to burst. Based on these observations, the relationship between consumer prices and money supply and credit seem to be rather tenuous at best.

The deflations in the 1930s U.S. and 1990s Japan did have an important element in common that does not exist today - dropping commodity prices. As early as the spring of 1929, farm commodities in the U.S. experienced a sharp drop. All commodities declined in the crash month of October and then they crashed themselves in the spring of 1930 . While commodity prices didn't crash in the 1990s, they were weak throughout the decade. Oil reached its price low of just over $10 a barrel in 1998. Ten years later it would be almost 15 times higher. Not only were commodities not declining in the 2000s, but they were experiencing major price increases resulting in significant inflation in the U.S. and most of the world. The commodity picture in the 2000s was just the opposite of the early 1930s U.S. and 1990s Japan.

The import/export and deficit picture has no similarity to the contemporary U.S. either. In the late 1920s, the U.S. had a massive trade surplus and was the biggest creditor nation in the world. Its boom had been built on exports as was the case for Japan in the later twentieth century. Drops in exports damaged both economies. On the other hand, the U.S. in the 2000s was the biggest debtor nation in the world having both a massive trade deficit and government debt, which required heavy borrowing and had inflationary implications. Japan in the 1980s was similar to the U.S. in the 1920s and both were very dissimilar to the U.S. in the 2000s.

Currency also plays a different role in all three scenarios. The U.S. was on the gold standard until 1933 and even after that the currency didn't float. The Japanese yen traded relatively flat during the 1990s. In neither case, did currency have a significant deflationary or inflationary effect, in contrast to the U.S. in 2008 where currency played an inflationary role. The U.S. dollar dropped to all time lows in late 2007 because of the Federal Reserves easy money policy. Since the U.S. imported much more than it exported, this raised import prices and had a bigger inflationary impact than it would have had otherwise.

NEXT: The Inflation Versus the Deflation Argument - Part 5

For notes related to this talk, please see, 'Inflation vs Deflation Argument' at:
http://investing.meetup.com/21/Files

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

For more about us, please see our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21

The Myth About the U.S. Dollar and the Trade Deficit

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

One of the most widespread pieces of misinformation that is believed in and broadcast by the financial community is that as the U.S. dollar falls, the trade deficit will improve and by implication even disappear. It is almost impossible to view financial TV or read the press without seeing this incorrect piece of information being cited with great certainty and authority by the 'experts'. While this idea was indeed true when the U.S. was on the gold standard, it is not true in a monetary regime where where the dollar floats instead of having a fixed value.

It is only necessary to look at two charts to see that the generally accepted relationship between the U.S. dollar and the trade deficit is false. Those charts are the value of the trade-weight dollar (the value of the U.S. dollar based on the currencies of its major trading partners) and the trade deficit itself. It becomes immediately obvious when examining these charts the declining dollar has had less and less positive impact on the trade deficit over time and seems to have actually made the trade deficit worse since 2000. New York Investing meetup thought this issue was so important that we made one of our first videos about it (please see: "The U.S. Dollar Relationship to Inflation and the Economy" at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3amH-T1B9pQ).

The U.S. went off the gold standard in 1971. There has been a continual trade deficit since 1977 and the amount of the deficit has gotten bigger and bigger over time. Classical economics would infer from this that the value of the dollar has been steadily rising. Instead the value of the dollar has been in a long-term downtrend since 1984. The trade-weighted dollar in fact lost around half its value between 1984 and 1992 and while the trade deficit decreased at the end of this period, at no point did it disappear. The dollar has been in a sharp decline since 2002 and the trade deficit, in total contradiction to classical economic theory, has skyrocketed during that time.

A hint as to how the U.S. trade deficit has managed to grow while the dollar was in sharp decline appeared in the report on the January 2008 trade deficit. Even though the U.S. dollar had been almost in free fall for the preceding several months because of Federal Reserve easy money policy, the trade deficit once again defied classical economic thought and increased instead of decreasing. An explanation in the report mentioned that the price of oil had gone up so much (and the U.S. is a major oil importer and has imported an increasing amount of oil since the early 1970s), that it had more than wiped out any benefits from the falling dollar elsewhere. Since the falling dollar itself makes the price of oil go up, a possible destructive feedback mechanism could be at work. In this scenario a falling dollar causes oil prices to rise and overwhelm the benefits elsewhere of the falling dollar, so the trade deficit goes up. In turn, the rising trade deficit damages the U.S. dollar (since the U.S. has to borrow money from foreigners to fund the trade deficit) and the dollar goes down further. The cycle then repeats itself over and over again.

Next: Housing Market Collapses, but the Statistics Hold Up

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

For more about us, please go to our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21