Bond Auction Puts Focus On Interest Rates

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. is auctioning off $81 billion in government debt this week. This is just a small part of the never ending supply needed to fund trillion dollar budget deficits as far as the eye can see. The Fed officially stopped its quantitative easing program to buy treasuries on October 31st, so it will be interesting to see what happens to interest rates in the next two or three months. The most vulnerable part of the interest rate curve has always been the 30-year. Foreign central banks have moved their purchases to shorter dated paper and the Fed itself concentrated on buying in the 7 to 10 year range. If the Fed restarts its quantitative easing program (and this is a possibility) it will resume purchases of bonds with those maturities. The 30-year is orphaned without major supporters no matter what happens.

This weeks auction includes $25 billion in 10-years on Tuesday and $16 billion on Thursday. Bonds prices are rallying today (and interest rates going down) even though supply is increasing. This defies free-market behavior and should make it clear that the bond market is regularly highly manipulated in the short term. The Fed notched the usual manipulation up much higher this year however. Figures from the second quarter indicated the Fed bought 48% of newly issued government debt ... and it did so with newly printed money. While the mainstream media has constantly reported that demand for U.S. bonds has remained strong this year, it almost always fails to mention that it is because the Fed is making a substantial percentage of the purchases.

Rising interest rates will be one of the last legs of the inflation trade to kick in because the government has a lot of control over them. The U.S. 30-year interest rate has been in a 27 year downtrend with a yield peak of just over 15% in September 1981 and a bottom last December at just over 2.5%. A rise in interest rates to around 4.8% will break a downtrend line from 1987 (when Alan Greenspan became Fed chair and easy money became the norm for U.S. monetary policy). When 30-year rates can break this level and stay above it, a multi-year rise in interest rates will begin.

In the short term the daily interest rate charts are bullish for the 30-year ($tyx or ^tyx). The 50-day moving average has been trading above the 200-day since last May. Both the 50-day and 200-day are moving up. After the rally from last December to this June when the 30-year rate doubled, the yield fell back to and bounced off the 200-day moving average. So far, this looks like it was the end of the retracement and the perfect buy point. The short-term uptrend is still in place and will remain so as long as the 200-day moving average keeps going up. When it occurs, a decisive break of the 4.8% yield could lead rates up to 6.0%. There are two leveraged ETFs that traders and investors can use to go long 30-year interest rates (the same as shorting the bonds), TBT and TMV. TBT represents a 2X short of 20 to 30-year treasuries and TMV a 3X short of 30-years. Both of these can be highly volatile.

Disclosure: Currently long TBT and TMV.

NEXT: Gold Rumbles as Dollar Crumbles

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Trader of Last Resort

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Yesterday, a spectacular market rally took place once again. This is the third time in approximately a month that the Dow has had close to a 1000 point intraday rally. The last such rally took place on October 28th and conveniently rallied the market right into election day. That rally fell apart the moment the voting was over, with the market experiencing the biggest two-day back to back price drop since 1987. While the Fed rate cut was allegedly the reason for the late October move up, the motivation for yesterday's out of the blue rally is not immediately evident.

The economic news was bad before the market opened and only got worse during the day. Big caps Intel and Walmart had already lowered earnings expectations. The weekly unemployment report showed a way above expectations 516,000 new claims for unemployment, which matched the post-911 figures when the U.S. economy briefly ground to a halt. Continuing claims hit a level last seen during the deep recessionary early 1980s. Next came the Trade Deficit. Its figures showed that even though there was a drop in imports last month, the drop in exports was even bigger. The drop in the price of oil was a major cause of the import drop, while the export drop seemed to be more the consequence of a declining global economy. The impact of the rising U.S. dollar, already reflected in oil prices seems to have yet to have fully impacted U.S. exports. Expect that it will be doing so in the not too distant future. Finally, the Budget Deficit numbers for October were released and there was a record monthly deficit of $237 billion (actually $662 billion or 55% of GDP if you exclude the money looted from the social security and other trust funds). For fiscal year 2008, which ended on September 30th, the entire yearly deficit was only $455 billion.

It is not surprising in the least that the market sold off on this news and that a rally attempt in the morning failed. By the beginning of the afternoon, the Nasdaq, S&P 500, and the Russell 2000 all hit new yearly lows and the Dow was getting close to doing so. Market stalwarts, like Citigroup, General Electric and Goldman Sachs were in collapse mode, falling to 8.27, 14.58, and 61.02 respectively. The technical picture was breaking down. Suddenly at 1:00 o'clock the market turned around. Was major support hit? No. Was there release of some good news? No. Could things have become much worse if something wasn't done? Yes. Was the PPT involved? In all likelihood.

The quasi-secret Plunge Protection Team (PPT), officially known as the Working Group on Capital Markets, was created by a presidential executive order from Ronald Regan shortly after the 1987 market meltdown. It's purpose was originally to prevent similar crashes in the future. This Regan/Greenspan effort expanded the Fed's role as the lender of last resort to include 'trader of last resort'. It should be assumed that a lot of seemingly illogical trading behavior that has taken place since the credit crisis began can be traced to the efforts of the PPT. Yesterday's rally has many of the earmarks of recent PPT behavior. Timing in the afternoon at 1:00, 2:00, 2:15, 2:30. Rallies starting for no reason or for reasons that are already known. Rallies starting after chart support is broken with the market becoming vulnerable to a much bigger drop. Rallies taking place at politically convenient times. While there are major ethical problems with the government interfering with free-market trading, there is also the problem that it only works short-term. Any PPT generated rally will inevitably lead to lower lows as the Japanese have discovered over time with their government based market interference. Their stock market has taken 18 years so far to hit bottom - and the U.S. may be setting itself up for a similar future.

NEXT: T & A and the GS-20 Summit

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bubble, Bubble, Toil, and Trouble

The 'Helicopter Economics Guide Investing' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

The Subprime Crisis that began causing turmoil in the U.S. markets in July 2007 was merely a small part of a massive and pervasive credit bubble that reached into every nook and cranny of the U.S. financial system. A huge excess in credit had been extended and utilized everywhere and to almost everyone. Government, consumers, market players, and businesses had borrowed beyond the hilt to maintain a system that required an ever-increasing amount of credit to sustain itself. Subprime debt was merely the weakest link in this credit chain, so it broke first.

The origins of the subprime bubble can be traced back to events in the 1980s, Early in the decade the idea that less regulation of financial institutions was a good idea took hold. The Savings and Loan industry was deregulated and it turned into a monumental failure that wound up costing the U.S. taxpayer $200 billion because of the out of control corruption, theft, and financial incompetence that deregulation allowed to occur. Nevertheless, deregulation of the financial industry continued and regulation of financial instruments such as derivatives or new industry players, such as hedge funds did not take place because 'regulation was too costly'. Federal Reserve chair Alan Greenspan was generally opposed to regulation and not only did everything possible to prevent new regulations, but didn't utilize the Fed's existing powers to regulate during the years he controlled the Fed from 1987 to 2006.

Decreasing regulation was then combined with a huge increase in liquidity provided by the Federal Reserve. This process began during the 1987 stock market crash, which Alan Greenspan handled successfully with a sharp drop in interest rates and by pumping money into the financial system. This set the tone for the next 19 years of the Greenspan Fed. In order to bailout the U.S. banking system from the Savings and Loan Crisis, interest rates were lowered
too much and for too long in the early 1990s. This excess in liquidity in turn led to the stock market bubble later in the decade. When the tech-stock bubble collapsed, interest rates were eventually lowered to one percent and this inflated a real estate bubble - something that Greenspan continually denied existed.

The conditions that led to these bubbles were no different than the ones the created all bubbles throughout history. Declining yields combined with an excess of capital (both are created simultaneously by the Fed), lack of regulation which allows for widespread fraud and corruption, and a technical or financial innovation. In the case of the tech stock bubble, the Internet was the technical innovation and for the real estate bubble, it was packaging subprime loans into bonds which could be sold, transferring the risk to other parties and providing capital to make more loans. As more and more loans were made, the quality of those loans by necessity deteriorated.

Bubbles always have feedback mechanisms as well and once started they become almost impossible to stop until they burst. Once they burst however, an anti-bubble forms with the original feedback mechanism operating in reverse. This anti-bubble in itself becomes almost impossible to stop until it exhausts itself. The feedback mechanism is what allows prices in bubbles to go way beyond anything reasonable or even imaginable when they start and then to the drop on the downside to levels that are incredibly low.

Ben Bernanke was desperately trying to reflate the real estate centric bubble with his rates cuts in the fall of 2007. This was a hopeless task, since once a bubble begins collapsing it usually takes many, many years before it can be reflated. What does occur is another bubble gets created elsewhere in the financial system. The Bernanke bubble would turn out to be in inflation.

Next: China's Olympic Size Bubble

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

Please see our web site for more about us: http://investing.meetup.com/21

Bernanke Gets in His Heliocopter and Does His First Money Drop on Wall Street

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

On August 17th 2007, one hour before stock futures expired, the Fed announced a surprise cut in the discount rate beginning a new cycle of easing. While allegedly meant to help the financial system, which was reeling from the fallout from the subprime crisis, the immediate purpose of the Fed's action was to prop up a teetering U.S. stock market (it was not clear that even at this
point Bernanke and the FOMC realized how serious the subprime contagion was). There had been a mini-crash in Japan the night before and stock futures were pointing to a large drop in the U.S. markets.

The Fed's announcement of it's discount rate cut had the desired impact. Stocks futures on the Dow rallied multi-hundreds of points by the opening, wiping out the profits of the shorts and transferring that money to the sellers of the future's contracts (could this huge transfer of wealth have been a gift from Bernanke to the broker-dealers?). If the Fed had waited one hour for its announcement, there of course would have been no difference in the impact of the discount cut on the economy, but the impact on markets would have been considerably different. The message to market participants was quite clear, from now on the Fed will be trading against the shorts and its actions can wipe you out whenever we chose to do so. By February 2008, the New York Investing meetup would document approximately a dozen times when the Fed engaged in similar extralegal activity in the U.S. stock markets ( put on video , which can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sobq7wCXjUw). This of course leads to the obvious question, "When a powerful government agency like the Federal Reserve acts outside the law, who is going to stop it?" Based on recent history, apparently no one.

The U.S. Federal Reserve under Bernanke was not the first central bank to try to manipulate the stock market, nor was Bernanke the first Fed chair to engage in this behavior. Greenspan himself was not above using Fed policy to drive the markets up, but he would let the markets reach some clearing price first before stepping in. He would not try to use Fed policy to prevent the markets from selling off, the crude approach clearly being used by Bernanke, realizing how risky this this could be for the financial system. It was in fact, Greenspan's policy of doing away with Fed secrecy that opened the way for Federal Reserve manipulation of the U.S. stock market. Once the markets knew instantly what the Fed was doing, traders would adjust their actions just as quickly instead of over a longer period of time as people gradually figured out that the Fed had made a significant rate move as had been the case in the past.

Perhaps the most egregious example of stock market manipulation in the recent times was by the Japanese financial authorities in the late 1980s and early 1990s. While interference in the free operation of the stock market, was beneficial in the short-term, the consequences in the long-term proved disastrous. A buy and hold strategy in Japanese stocks would have earned an investor nothing from 1992 to 2007. A similar result in the U.S. stock markets from 2007 to 2222 would mean the huge population of Baby Boomers retiring in that time period and counting on stock market gains to fund their retirement would be in for a very rude awakening.

Perhaps, the ancient Greeks had it right after all, when those in power acted like the gods, a tragic ending was always inevitable.

Next: Bernanke Shoots the Dollar Down; New York Investing Predicts Out of Control Inflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

For more about the New York Investing meetup, please go to our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21