The Helicopter Economics Investing Guide: December 2011

Friday, December 30, 2011

A Technical Look at Gold and Silver at the End of 2011

Silver shows greater weakness than gold on its charts with the selling much more advanced. Unlike gold, silver has hit new yearly lows and when this happens the first time, it is likely that a series of new lows will then be made, although short rallies frequently take place first. For SLV, the major silver ETF, the 50-day moving average already fell below the 200-day in October and the bearish pattern was confirmed when the 50-day then fell below the 325-day at the end of November. On the daily charts, the DMI is on a sell signal and this seems to be only halfway done at this point. The other technical indicators are also bearish. SLV is currently being held up by support around 26. Much stronger support exists around 21 (really a band of support between 18 and 21).

The recent drops in gold and silver should be considered to be buying opportunities, although investors with a longer-term horizon should not be pushing the buy button just yet. The charts do not indicate a definitive bottom has been put in, nor that this is likely to happen in the next few weeks. Secular bull markets tend to last for around 20 years and this indicates the ultimate high for gold and silver will be around 2020. While there is always a higher high in the future during secular bulls that doesn't mean that there aren't major reversals along the way. The stock market secular bull between 1982 and 2000 had the 1987 crash, the 1989 and 1997 flash crashes, the 1990/91 bear market and the 1998 bear market. Smart investors used these declines as buying opportunities and made lots of money when they did. The same will be true for gold and silver for the rest of this decade.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Rumors of Housing's Rise From the Dead Are Greatly Exaggerated

Housing starts for November were released today, December 20th, and the stock market rallied strongly on the supposedly "good" news. The statistical error rate in the housing report is so huge, that the numbers are meaningless -- and easily subject to manipulation by a government that is desperate to provide news of a recovering economy.

Housing starts peaked at 2,273,000 in January 2006. According to the Commerce Department, construction of new U.S. residences in November 2011 was 635,000. Almost five years later, housing activity is still less than 28% of what it was at the peak. Despite this almost three-quarters decline in housing activity, this is being spun as evidence of an economic recovery by the mainstream media. Would you consider it progress if your salary was only 28% of what is was five years ago?

As dismal as this statistic is, it is very possible the actual number is much worse. The housing starts report has the highest statistical margin of error of any government report. The error is so huge that is a waste of taxpayer money to produce this report. The error in the overall number can be greater than ten percent. The error on individual components can be as much as 33%. This is important because better housing start numbers in 2011 (November was not the first month when better numbers were reported, this took place earlier in the year as well), have been created by a supposed surge in apartment house construction. Apartment construction rose by 25.3% in November and this is what is making the overall number higher. Considering the huge statistical error rate, it is possible that it didn't rise at all.

Optimists who think it did rise by that much need to ponder the implications of why a lot of apartments are being built and very few single-family houses. The inescapable conclusion is that few Americans can afford to buy their own home anymore. I would hardly describe that as an indication of better economic conditions. Even more telling is that the number of completed housing units dropped by 5.6% in November even though housing starts rose earlier this year. If this is correct, a lot of housing that is begun is not being finished. While that makes no sense, nothing else about the report does either.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Gold Breaks Down, Where to Look for a Bottom

The bearish behavior of gold in latter 2008 was caused by the Credit Crisis. While you have probably heard ad nauseum that gold is a safe haven in a crisis, this does not include credit crises
(which are crises in the financial system when the banking system has difficulty functioning). We just saw that gold went down during the 2008 credit crisis and yet many gold "experts" somehow can't figure out that it should go down during the current 2011 credit crisis coming out of Europe. In our era, gold can drop during a credit crisis because central banks lease gold at low rates to the big banks and hedge funds. These entities are desperate to raise cash, so they sell the gold into the market (they can't sell many of the assets on their books). This depresses the price of gold -- temporarily. But at some point, they have to buy the gold back and return it to the central bank it was leased from. This makes the price of gold rise again. I explained the entire process in the second volume of my book "Inflation Investing", which covers gold, silver and other metals.

Gold has support at the 65-week simple moving average, but this is not the likely bottom in a full-blown credit crisis. In order to find that, it is necessary to look at a monthly chart. It can be seen from this that the ultimate support would be at the 40-month simple moving average. Currently, this is around 120 for the gold ETF GLD. This possible buy point, which should be considered a worst-case scenario, was discussed in the October meeting of the New York Investing meetup. See the five-year monthly chart for GLD below.

It's important for investors to focus on the big picture and not get carried away with all the distractions of day to day price movements. Markets go up and down. No market goes in one direction. Every time gold drops, commentators come out of the woodwork saying it means the rally is over and deflation is taking place -- neither is true. It is the bigger price movements that have meaning and gold is in a long-term uptrend. In any secular bull market, a large drop is always a golden opportunity to buy. Just wait until there is some evidence that a bottom has been put in.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York
Investing meetup http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Gold and Silver Plummet as Dollar Rallies on EU Woes

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The euro fell to a yearly low on December 14th as Italian interest rates at auction hit new highs. Collateral damage to the EU crisis is showing up not only in stock prices, but in the precious metals markets as well.

The euro fell below the psychologically important 1.30 level in European trade and is testing support from last January. If it breaks that support (and it is pretty certain that it will), the 125 level is the next stop and 1.20 after that. The euro can be tracked through the ETF FXE. At the same time the euro is breaking down, the trade-weighted dollar has broken out. The dollar has been stuck at key resistance at 80 since September. It tested this level both in September and in November. It traded as high as 80.67 in early morning trade. There is still strong resistance just under 82. A break above that will cause the dollar will head toward 88. The dollar can be tracked through the ETF DXY.

As the dollar rises, gold and other commodities fall. Spot gold was as low as $1562 an ounce in early New York trade. Gold plummeted after the New York open and was down as much as $68 an ounce.
Gold can be tracked through the ETF GLD. Gold decisively broke its 200-day moving average (which is very bearish) and this was the first time it has traded below this level since early 2009. The next level of support is the 65-week moving average, which is currently in the high 1400s.

While gold in general should go up during a crisis, this did not happen in the fall of 2008 -- gold was down around 30% at the time. During credit crises -- and the situation in Europe is a second global credit crisis -- it is reasonable for gold to decline. Central banks lease gold cheaply to banks and large hedge funds and they sell it on the market to raise quick cash (I have explained how this is done is some detail in my book "Inflation Investing"). This time around, there is the added danger that the IMF will sell some of its large hoard of gold to raise money for a eurozone bailout.

Gold's companion metal silver is much more volatile than the yellow metal and is influenced by the economy as well as financial market events. Silver traded as low as $28.47down $2.37 after New York trading opened. This was more than a 7% drop. Silver can be tracked through the ETF SLV. It has strong support around $26. If it breaks that, expect it to head toward the $21 level.

The EU debt crisis is not over and is likely to continue for a while longer and possibly for many more months. EU leaders have come up with one "solution" to the crisis after that has failed shortly after it was announced. Look to the markets to see whether or not their future gambits will create some viable end to their problems. So far the markets have made it very clear that the situation in Europe is continuing to deteriorate and it is dangerous to be on the long side of almost any investment except the U.S. dollar.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Friday, December 9, 2011

New EU Plan is Much Ado About Nothing

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Once again the EU has come up with a too-little, too-late solution to deal with its very serious debt crises. Proposals for a tighter fiscal union and the small amount of funds committed will only delay the inevitable default.

Treaties only have meaning if their terms are actually followed. The eurozone already has a treaty that created it. That treaty has very clear fiscal benchmarks that all members must follow. The key benchmark concerning a maximum 3% debt to GDP ratio for an annual budget was almost universally ignored by all member states. Greece was only the most extreme example. It finally admitted to lying about its numbers (it was not "caught in the act" by the central EU head office even though the numbers it submitted were too good to be true). Greece originally reported a projected debt to GDP ratio of 2.0% for 2009. After many revisions, it turned out to be 15.4%. It was not punished for its duplicity or major violation of EU accords; instead it has been offered three bailout packages so far.

The new treaty provisions once again state that the eurozone countries need to have a balanced budget and should not violate the 3% debt to GDP limit. This wasn't enforced the first time and there is no reason to believe that it will be enforced the second time either. This time however the new treaty states that there will be automatic consequences, including possible sanctions. I'm sure they all had a good laugh about those possible sanctions. This is a complete and total joke and should be treated as such.

As for the current amount of money proposed to rescue the over indebted EU countries, it is much too inadequate to be more than a temporary stopgap measure (the only thing the Europeans seem capable of doing). The debt problem for the troubled EU countries -- Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Spain -- runs into the trillions. How much is on the table now -- €200billion. The EU will loan this amount to the IMF, which will in turn use it to provide the same amount of aid back to the EU. Not only is this is a paltry sum, it is disturbing they need to engage in a financial shell game as part of their bailout attempts. Even more absurd is that the ESM (European Stability Mechanism), set up to handle the debt crisis, will be capped at €500 billion. What will happen when they run out of this money and there is still a large amount of debt in danger of defaulting?

The problem with debt crises is that the amount needed to handle them is a moving target. It keeps rising and rising with time because interest rates keep rising and this makes borrowing costs continuously more expensive. Greek one-year bond yields are at 353% today. Even with three rescue packages, they continue to climb toward the stars. Immediately after the announcement of each rescue plan, yields dropped significantly for a short period of time, then they went much higher than they had been before. Expect to see this pattern with the other EU debt crisis countries. The EU is very good at getting its problems under control for a few weeks with its band aid measures. Expect its current efforts to be another short-term success that turns into a long-term failure.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Volcker Says U.S. Mired in Recession and Inflation is Coming

In a talk given to a small audience at the American Museum of Finance on Wednesday evening, former Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker stated that there was an ongoing recession in the U.S. and that we will be seeing inflation in the future because of the actions of the Fed and Treasury during the 2008 Credit Crisis.

While most of Volcker's talk centered on the current crisis in Europe, he frequently made connections to what was going on in the EU to what has taken place in the United States. His remarks about the U.S. being mired in an ongoing recession were in response to a question on whether an infrastructure bank would be a good idea. As part of his answer he stated, "We're not going to end the recession in the next month or the next year. It's going to take several years before the recession is over." The U.S. government claims that the last recession ended in June 2009and has repeatedly said that the U.S. has not fallen back into recession even though unemployment and consumer confidence have continually remained at recession levels.

When discussing the bailouts during the Credit Crisis, Volcker remarked "people said that there will be inflation... that's true over time." Volcker was critical of pro-inflation policies. He said that "the problem with inflation is that it looks so enticing, but the historical record doesn't verify that it is." He continued, "We would be very foolish if we deliberately went out and created inflation." The Federal Reserve under Ben Bernanke has kept Fed Funds rates around zero percent for three years now, which means real interest rates have been negative. Negative interest rates are highly inflationary as is money printing. The Fed has expanded its balance sheet — one of the many ways it prints money — by over $2 trillion dollars since September 2008.

Volcker described the 2008 Credit Crisis as a "regulatory failure", but added "the Fed is only one regulator". He went on to state that "the Federal Reserve took a lot of extraordinary measures" to handle events back then and "the Fed and the Treasury did not necessarily follow the letter of the law" in attempting to control the damage to the financial system. Volcker further laid part of the blame for the Credit Crisis to proprietary trading by banks and said he was "not in favor of banks being speculative entities being supported by the U.S. government".

Paul Volcker was Chairman of the Federal Reserve from August 1979 to August 1987 and is widely credited with bringing down the high inflation of the 1970s by raising interest rates. More recently he headed the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, which he left in February.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Why the U.S. Unemployment Numbers Can't Be Trusted

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

There is more fantasy in the U.S. employment numbers than in a Harry Potter novel. According to the BLS, the U.S. added 120,000 jobs in November 2011 and the unemployment rate fell by 0.4%. This is not possible.

The U.S. economy needs to create approximately 150,000 jobs a month to keep the unemployment rate steady based on new entrants into the labor force (the oft cited 200,000 figure is based on past conditions that are no longer applicable). According to official sources, the U.S. added 131,000 jobs a month in 2011. This is better than in previous years, but still not enough to reduce the unemployment rate. Yet, the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) claims the unemployment rate is dropping and fell from 9.0% to 8.6% in November. How is this possible?

Well, first of all, it isn't. These numbers were created — and "created" is a very appropriate word in this case — by claiming that large numbers of workers left the U.S. labor force. At the same time, the U.S. government has stated that an economic recovery has takien place. A country's labor force does not shrink during recoveries, it grows. This has not happened during the current U.S. "recovery".

The U.S. labor force had approximately six million fewer workers in November 2011 than it did in November 2007. Four years ago, 146,793,000 people were employed in the U.S. In November 2011, only 140,987,000 had jobs. This makes no sense if a recovery has taken place. It does make sense however if there is an ongoing recession and government statisticians have decided to massage the numbers for political reasons.

On the flip side, there were 79,069,00 people not in the labor force in November 2007 and today that number is 86,757,000 — almost eight million greater. The labor force of the U.S. should not be shrinking because the number of students and immigrants looking for jobs exceeds the number of people retiring. People do leave the labor force though if they have determined that there simply are no jobs to be found. The recent Consumer Confidence survey from the Conference Board indicated that less than 6% of Americans thought jobs were currently plentiful.

In November 2011 alone, the BLS claims that the U.S. labor force dropped by almost a net 600,000. This helped reduce the reported unemployment rate to 8.6%. This form of statistical manipulation is something that might be expected in a corrupt third-world backwater. Apparently, this is the standard that Washington is now adhearing to for its statistical reporting.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any securi

The Helicopter Economics Investing Guide

Friday, December 30, 2011

A Technical Look at Gold and Silver at the End of 2011

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Rumors of Housing's Rise From the Dead Are Greatly Exaggerated

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Gold Breaks Down, Where to Look for a Bottom

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Gold and Silver Plummet as Dollar Rallies on EU Woes

Friday, December 9, 2011

New EU Plan is Much Ado About Nothing

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Volcker Says U.S. Mired in Recession and Inflation is Coming

Friday, December 2, 2011

Why the U.S. Unemployment Numbers Can't Be Trusted

Share and Bookmark Blog

My Blog List

Daryl Montgomery

Blog Archive

About Me

Friday, December 30, 2011

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Friday, December 9, 2011

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Friday, December 2, 2011

Subscribe to Blog

Share and Bookmark Blog

My Blog List

Daryl Montgomery

Blog Archive

About Me