Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Behind the Market Drop and Why it Could Get Much Worse
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
After a sharp rise since last October, the market looks like it is set up for one of its usual spring downturns. Without continued liquidity injections from the major central banks, it won't be able to break through the wall of resistance it's currently facing, nor will there be much support to hold it up.
As has been the case for months, trouble in Greece is currently roiling international markets. The bond swap deal reached as part of the latest bailout settlement isn't going well. With a March 8th deadline looming, Bloomberg is reporting that private investors holding around 20% of Greek government debt have so far agreed to participate. The Greek government has set a threshold of 75% for the deal to go through. While the mainstream media has consistently cheer leaded the success of every bailout deal, the market has never been convinced. Yields on one-year Greek government bonds have been on a strong upward trajectory since last summer and were over 1000% today.
The eurozone debt crisis has resulted in a great deal of liquidity being poured into the market by the Europeans. The ECB pumped approximately half a trillion euros via LTROs (long-term refinancing operations) last fall. The rise in global stock markets can be traced from this event. At the same time, the Bank of England was on its second round of quantitative easing and examination of the U.S. Federal Reserve balance sheet shows what looks like the beginning of QE3. The monetary base in the United States was also moving straight up the chart last fall and earlier this year. No matter where you looked, liquidity was flowing into the system. Since stock markets respond immediately to extra liquidity, a powerful global rise in markets took place.
The problem with liquidity-driven markets is that if the liquidity dries up, they can wither like a plant that has been denied water. The constant supply of liquidity always has to slow down because eventually the liquidity will flow into the mainstream economy and turn into ugly inflation. The big liquidity pump that started last fall seems to be falling to slow trickle lately and markets are quite vulnerable once this happens. A failure of the Greek bailout deal (and government bond yields indicate that the market expects this to happen), would cause a massive negative liquidity event that would be on the scale of the Lehman default in 2008. It might even be worse.
At the same time liquidity issues are impacting the market, stock prices are stuck at resistance and the technical indicators are deteriorating. The S&P 500 is at its high that it reached earlier in 2011. The Dow Industrials are also at last year's resistance. Only the Nasdaq has managed to break through because of a small number of stocks like Apple Computer (AAPL) -- which is clearly exhibiting bubble-like action.
Recent news indicates deteriorating economies outside the United States. The economy within the U.S. is only being held up by massive government spending with budget deficits of $1.3 trillion last years and projected to be $1.3 trillion again for 2012. This is all borrowed or newly printed money. How big would the U.S. GDP be without these continual massive injections of government pseudo-cash? Inflation is also clearly showing up in the ISM Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing (Services) reports. The Prices component is the highest one for both. Prices for services (80% of the U.S. economy) have been rising for 31 months in a row and are listed as accelerating in February.
Stocks usually have a selloff in March or April. This year they are especially vulnerable. There will almost certainly be some type of drop. How big remains to be seen. The possibility for major selling should be kept in mind by investors.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Friday, September 16, 2011
Central Banks Pump Money to Prop Up Europe
Exactly three years after Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy and almost brought down the global financial system, central banks in North America, Europe and Asia engaged in a coordinated money pumping operation to prevent the EU banking system from stalling. The move created a sharp stock market rally, especially in financial shares, just as was the case when similar actions took place during the 2008 Credit Crisis.
Involved in Thursday's action were the U.S. Federal Reserve, the ECB, the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of Japan. The purpose was to improve dollar liquidity among European banks struggling because of the Greek debt crisis. The credit markets have frozen up, just as they did after the Lehman bankruptcy, and U.S. banks have been unwilling to lend dollars to European banks. The ECB will now be able to access dollars by swapping assets with the Federal Reserve. It wasn't stated in the announcement what assets were involved, but obviously they are substandard ones that wouldn't be accepted in free market trading. This operation also increases exposure of the U.S. financial system to the new credit crisis in Europe.
Such coordinated money-pumping operations are a sign of desperation on the part of the authorities. They were commonplace after Lehman's bankruptcy on September 15, 2008. They created significant volatility in the stock market back then as they did yesterday. Both the German DAX and the French CAC-40 closed up more than 3%. Troubled banks had huge rallies, with Lloyd's Banking Group up over 7%. In 2008, even greater volatility took place, but the rallies proved time and again to be only temporary. The market ultimately nosedived.
The Friday before the Lehman bankruptcy, the S&P 500 closed at 1251.70. Lehman declared bankruptcy on Monday. At the end of the week, the S&P 500 closed at 1255.00. The day before however, the S&P rallied off of its intraday low of 1133.50 to a close of 1206.51 (that's a 6.4% intraday rally -- an enormous move for an index like the S&P). So, the first week after Lehman's bankruptcy it looked like the market wouldn't be impacted that much. It turned out that the actions of central banks provided investors with a false sense of security however.
By the end of September 2008, the S&P 500 closed at 1166.36. Then at the end of October it was down to 968.75. At the end of November, it had dropped to 896.24. It actually closed higher the last day of December at 903.25, before falling to 825.88 at the end of January. By the close of February, the S&P was trading at 735.08. It finally bottomed at 666.79 on March 6, 2009. All along the way, there were big moves up that coincided with the latest money injections of the central banks.
While mainstream media reports tend to portray the central bank actions and the big rallies they cause as good news for the market, they are actually an indication that more trouble is on the way. All investors have to do is remember what happened just three years ago. Yesterday's central bank action indicates that more volatility and lower stock prices are in our future.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Monday, September 27, 2010
Was Window Dressing and M&A Driving Friday's Market?
The market had a spectacular rally on Friday with the S&P 500 up 2.1% on the day. It was unlikely the August durable goods report was responsible for the market's action, since durable goods fell 1.3%. End of the quarter window dressing from mutual fund managers was a more likely explanation with impending mergers and acquisitions news being another.
Window dressing is when funds buy winning stocks so they can show them on their books after the end of the quarter and imply they owned them all along. This has been a common Wall Street practice for decades. September has been an incredibly strong month for stocks. Although there are four trading days left in the month, so far September 2010 looks like the best September since the 1930s Great Depression. Which year during the depression depends on the index. As of Friday, the S&P 500 was up 9.7% on the month.
The U.S. markets were falling apart during the summer, but the tone changed dramatically after the Fed restarted quantitative easing (money printing). The Europeans have been pumping money at the same time through their Euro-TARP program. All asset classes - stocks, bonds, and commodities - have been rising on the liquidity flood. Based on market performance, an observer would assume that the U.S. economy has not only turned around, but is zooming and problems in the eurozone have been fixed. Neither is the case. The mainstream press has done its best though to paint a rosy picture. It managed to put a positive spin on Friday's reported drop in August durable goods.
Not only was the S&P 500 up 2.1% on Friday, but the Dow rose 1.8%, the Nasdaq 2.3% and the small cap Russell 2000 was 3.3% higher. These are huge movements for one day. Trading volume was ho hum as usual. Despite press reports, economic news wasn't the cause of this action. Window dressing was likely the major driver, with mergers and acquisitions adding fuel to the fire. Too much cheap money is leading to a boom in this area. If companies don't see potential growth because the economy is weak, easy money lets them buy growth by acquiring another company. The new combined company then lays off a lot of workers, which raises the unemployment rate and creates bigger economic problems down the line.
The big liquidity surge is well-timed for the U.S. election on November 2nd. The administration and its supporters are likely to be citing the good performance of the stock market as evidence that their programs are working. This has already happened in the past. The 2009 stimulus bill was also timed to have maximum spending in the second quarter of 2010 and not early on when the economy was in horrible shape. A huge 'Recovery Summer' PR campaign was planned as a lead in to the fall election, but lack of evidence of a recovery caused it to fall apart. The Fed then had to restart quantitative easing to paper over (quite literally) the problem and create some good news in the market. The good news should continue until November 2nd. It might even peak that day. We will just have to wait and see.
Disclosure: No positions.
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Friday, September 17, 2010
Will Stocks Continue to Rally After Quadruple Witch?
Today is one of four days during the year when index futures, index options, stock options and stock futures all expire. The market has rallied throughout September into the quadruple witch, but will it continue to do so?
As has been the case with every rally since the bottom in 2009, volume this September has been below average on the Dow Industrials. Low volume is an indicator of lack of enthusiasm for a trend and indicates the trend is likely to reverse soon. Nevertheless, stocks have managed to defy the lack of buying support and hold up for almost a year and a half now. This is theoretically impossible in a free market. It is very possible in a manipulated market however where one or a few large players control the game. In such circumstances, some tip sheet on Federal Reserve liquidity pumping would be the best guide to be used for trading stocks.
The mainstream media has been giving the rally as much support as possible as well. Weekly unemployment claims which invariably fall around holiday weeks, not surprisingly went down the week before and after Labor Day. Instead of reporting this as business as usual, the cheerleading media claimed it was new evidence of an improving economy. Retail sales supposedly had a minor jump in August, although the report was not credible. The smoking gun was the auto component which barely declined over August 2009 when Cash for Clunkers was giving auto sales a huge boost. Independent industry sources showed a huge drop in sales year over year, but somehow government statisticians know nothing about it. Both reports were replete with missing data, so some component numbers were merely wishful thinking estimates. The mainstream media didn't manage to report this key information. A consumer confidence survey today indicated confidence dropped to its lowest level since August 2009. The cause for the drop was consumers getting really gloomy about the future prospects for the economy. Apparently they are increasingly tuning out the information they are getting from the government/media complex and believing what they see with their own eyes instead.
So even though the economy is continuing to deteriorate, government statisticians are doing their best to hide this from the public. The mainstream media is doing its best to help them out by not questioning any number they produce no matter how unreliable or unbelievable it is. The Fed and other central banks and treasuries (think the one trillion dollar euro-TARP program) are doing their best to keep the world financial system afloat in a sea of liquidity. The most obvious evidence for this is a range of assets - stocks, bonds, and commodities - are all rising at once. This happens if there is more money in the system, otherwise traders would need to sell one asset in order to get funds to buy another. When they can bid up every asset, there has to be more available money and less risk aversion, which makes no sense given all the problems that currently exist.
Given the current environment, stocks can certainly continue to go up. Investors should assume the Fed will do everything possible until at least the election on November 2nd to make the market look good. There is no free lunch however. While liquidity driven markets can go higher and last longer than anyone thinks possible, they can also drop faster and much further than anyone would imagine. And this can take place suddenly. Constantly keeping the liquidity trough full also risks massive and sudden inflation. Don't expect to hear about this from the mainstream media though because they will be too busy telling you not to worry because everyone knows that liquidity fattened pigs can fly - or at least that's what the latest government report said.
Disclosure: No positions
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Friday, February 12, 2010
China Worries About Inflation, The EU Needs to Worry About Growth
The Chinese just announced a second increase in reserve levels for their banks. The first increase took place less than a month ago. That announcement was the earliest of three major withdrawals of liquidity from global markets. The other two were the U.S. Fed closing down five of its Credit Crisis liquidity injection programs on February 1st and the Bank of England temporarily halting its quantitative easing (read money printing) program shortly thereafter. Stocks and commodities started selling down with the first Chinese announcement and continued selling off with the others. Global markets got hit again with the second announcement and adding to their worries was a poor GDP report coming out of the euro zone.
China has been leading the world out of the global recession. This hasn't occurred by magic. It has engaged in a huge amount of stimulus to reeve up its economy. While doing so it also froze the value of its currency, the yuan, and this has kept it tremendously under valued compared to a free market price (some estimates are that the yuan should be 40% higher, even a greater amount is possible). Economic stimulus and undervalued currencies are both in and of themselves inflationary. The combination of the two in large amounts can be explosive. So China is understandably trying to lower liquidity in its economy by reigning in bank lending. While these efforts are minimal so far, traders are anticipating more serious efforts down the road. Food inflation is a particular danger for the Chinese and too much of it can risk political destabilization. Food prices are already rising in many parts of the world and reached over 19% in next-door India at one point in December.
While the Chinese have probably engaged in the most significant stimulus measures globally for any sizable economy, the euro zone has not been as nearly aggressive. While the U.S. lowered its funds rate to zero, and the UK to 0.5%, the interest rates in the euro zone were only dropped to 1.0%. Less stimulus in the euro zone means less inflation in the future, but also means less economic recovery now. Fourth quarter GDP figures came in at 0.1%, indicating overall growth is flat. Leading economy Germany had a zero percent quarter over quarter growth rate. Much troubled Greece's economy sank 0.8% from the previous quarter. Italy was down 0.2%. For all of 2009, the size of the 16-nation euro zone economy fell 4%. Growth in the 27 member EU (a number of countries in the EU don't use the euro) was also only 0.1% last quarter. No matter how you look at it, Europe is economically weak.
In mainstream media reporting of Europe's predicament, one major news service stated, "the recovery in the third quarter now appears likely to have been due to temporary factors like government spending boosts, a build-up in inventory levels and car scrappage schemes that pay people to trade in old cars". The exact same factors have boosted GDP in the U.S., although that wasn't mentioned. The U.S. reported 1.4% quarterly GDP growth for the last quarter of 2009 and this was triumphed in news coverage. Investors can expect that number to be revised downward as was the case with the original third quarter figure. Greater stimulus in the U.S. has been one reason that American GDP numbers have been better than in Europe. Another reason is that the U.S. is willing to engage in more blatant manipulation of its economic statistics.It's a lot easy to 'fix' the economic numbers after all than it is to actually fix the economy.
A slow down in the Chinese economy will have a strong impact on the Western industrialized nations. Much of the improvement that has taken place since the depths of the Credit Crisis in the fall of 2008 has been because of increased demand from China. The economies in the U.S., UK, Japan and Europe are still very weak. Based on recent actions, the powers that be in the US and UK seem oblvious to this. European leaders seem to be no sharper. Proposed austerity programs in the troubled euro zone economies - Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain will only cause further economic contraction. The fix for the Greece's debt problems - details are still forthcoming - is likely to be a win/lose situation.
Investors should expect that industrialized countries will be on inflation watch for a while longer. At some point even the incredibly oblivious U.S. Fed Chair Ben Bernanke will realize that there are still economic problems that have yet to be solved. More stimulus will follow. Stimulus is what has been behind the global market rallies that began in March 2009. Reduction of stimulus is what is behind the sell off that started in January. Investors should watch for signs that stimulus is returning. Until then, stock and commodity prices are likely to be pressured.
Disclosure: No positions.
NEXT: China is Selling Its U.S. Bond Holdings
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Withdrawal of Liquidity Threatens Second Global Meltdown
A global market sell off began today, February 4th, when the British Central Bank announced that it was calling a temporary halt to its quantitative easing (also known as money printing) program to gage the impact it was having on the British economy. This follows the U.S. Federal Reserve's announcement during its late January meeting that on February 1st it would be closing down five of its programs that have been providing liquidity to the financial system. The market rally since March 2009 has been based on liquidity and even a small reduction can cause a market drop, a large reduction can cause a crash.
Major European bourses were all down over 2% on the news. The U.S. stock market sold off strongly. All the major indices - the Dow, the S&P 500, the Nasdaq and the Russell 2000 - were already below their 50-day moving averages and are now almost certain to fall to their 200-day moving averages in future trading. If they don't hold at that level, the bull market that began last spring will be over.
The U.S. dollar rose as is common when the financial system is threatened, as was the case in the fall of 2008. The trade-weighted dollar almost hit 80.00 and has been over its 200-day moving average since last week. It's 50-day is rising and a cross of the 200-day from below would announce a new bull period. The euro is breaking down even further, despite progress having been made with Greek debt, which has been weighing on it for the past month. The charts indicate that the British pound is entering a new bear period today.
When the dollar starts rising for deflationary reasons, commodities will be hit. Silver gapped down and broke below a lower support line established in 2008 and also fell below its 200-day moving average. Gold then followed and broke below recent support. Expect Gold to test its 200-day, which is around other key support at $1000.
The global market collapse in the fall of 2008 was caused by a massive withdrawal of liquidity from the financial system. The world's central banks stopped it with a massive and unprecedented money pumping operation. This stabilized the system and lead to the rally in stocks and commodities. It did not however fix the underlying problems. It merely neutralized them. The industrialized economies are still heavily damaged and yet to recover, even though the central banks are acting as if they have. This will be their key mistake this time.
In the Great Depression of the 1930s, the U.S. Fed withdrew liquidity from the system as the crisis began and this worsened the collapse. While our current central bankers have learned the lesson to pump money into the financial system initially, they don't seem to realize that they need to continue to do so. They will get the idea sooner or later because the impact of liquidity withdrawal will become more than obvious and a political firestorm will follow if it goes on too long.
It looks like we are beginning the second phase of the great global meltdown. In this phase, central bankers will realize they must continue to print money to keep their economies functioning. Massive inflation is the ultimate outcome of this scenario. If they don't, ongoing recession that can morph into a depression is the alternative. Investors need to shift their porfolios with central banker's policy moves.
Disclosure: No positions.
NEXT: U.S. Employment Report: 617,000 More Jobs Lost in 2009
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
The Santa Claus Rally and the January Effect
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.The Santa Claus rally is a move up in stocks that takes place around December 25th. This rally was already part of Wall Street lore in the 1800s, and was memorialized in the ditty: 'If Santa fails to make a call, the bear will come to Broad and Wall'. There is no general agreement on the exact dates of the rally. It is defined as beginning from a few to several days before Christmas or immediately thereafter. It ends either in the current year or two or three days into the next year. It is most useful to think about it as two separate phenomenon. The first as the trading period around Christmas day and the second as the first four trading days of the new year. Each has its own message.
The bullishness in stocks around December 25th probably doesn't have much to do with the holiday per se, but with year end adjustments within the financial system. Instead of calling it the Santa Claus Rally, it would probably be more accurate to refer to it as the Year End Rally. If you look at long-term charts, you will note that the VIX, the volatility index, is either low or drops around the end of the most years. This is bullish for stocks. The VIX hit a yearly low on December 22nd in 2009 trading below 20 for the first time since the summer of 2008. An exceptionally low VIX while bullish in the short term sets the stock market up for eventual selling however.
What happens at the end of the year and at the beginning of the year can be quite different however and the two shouldn't be lumped together. Investment money tends to be reallocated at the beginning of a quarter and this is most pronounced in the first quarter. Investors should watch closely what sectors rally and what sectors of the market experience selling during the first four trading days of the year. This tells you where money is flowing. If the stock market overall sells off in the first four days, this is a bearish signal at least for the first quarter. It indicates big money is withdrawing its support from stocks.
The first four days trading signal is sometimes lumped in with the January Effect, but shouldn't be. The January Effect is a tendency for stocks to rally during the first month of the year, with small caps outperforming big and mid-caps. The January Effect was noted in the U.S. by the 1920s and perhaps even earlier. It has been observed in a number of stock markets throughout the world. The effect seems to have become dampened in recent years.
Trading volume tends to be low around the end of the year because many people are away because of the holidays. This can exaggerate price movements. Liquidity coming from the Fed and other central banks will have a more pronounced impact than usual. If you look at a chart for the U.S. Monetary Base, you will see that it has been rising vertically in the last few months. It is not surprising that the current liquidity fueled rally in stocks is continuing.
NEXT: NovaGold Leads Mining Group on Takeover
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Monday, December 21, 2009
Why Interest Rates Will Rise in 2010
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.While stocks were rallying, long-term U.S. treasuries were selling off sharply and interest rates climbing on December 21st. The rally was particularly noteable because 10-year bonds were selling down more strongly that 30-years - the opposite of the normal pattern. As part of its quantitative easing program, the U.S. Fed was purchasing 10-year treasuries up to October 31st of this year and this kept their yield artificially low. This trade now seems to be unwinding. Interest rates on consumer loans in the U.S., including mortgages and credit cards, are usually tied to the the 10-year treasury rate. Higher rates will dampen consumer spending going forward and this will be a negative for the economy in 2010. Investors can take advantage of rising rates though by buying ETFs that short longer-term bonds.
Long-term rates need to be examined in context. The yield spread, or the difference in interest rates, between them and short-dated paper provides significant information. The yield spread between 30-year treasuries and the 3-month t-bill has gotten to around 4.50%. This is much larger than normal. The spread was even bigger this June and in 1992. In the last two recessions in the early 1990s and 2000s, yield spreads didn't peak until about 18-months after the recession was over. They already got to those previous peak levels this June, during the recent recession. This indicates that the peak in the current cycle is going to be higher than it was previously. Assuming the current recession ended in July, as would be inferred from government GDP figures, this would indicate that there will be a peak in the yield spread around January 2011. Note that this is not the same as a peak in rates. The spread will narrow if long-term rates continue to go up, but short-term rates go up even faster.
While it looks like long-term rates are going to be higher in 2010, the exact amount is not predictable from yield spread analysis. From a technical perspective, the 10-year treasury will have a significant breakout if its yield rises above 4.00% and stays there. For the 30-year treasury, the key rate is 5.00%. Possible interest rate targets for the 10-year after a breakout are 4.75% to 5.50% and for the 30-year 6.00% to 7.00%. A breakout is not taking place just yet however. As of now, some time in the first couple of months of 2010 looks like the most likely time frame for this to occur. Investors who want to short 7 to 10 year treasuries can buy TBF (100% short), PST (200% short) or TYO (300% short). Investors who want to short 20 to 30 year treasuries can buy TBT (200% short) or TMV (300% short of 30-years only).
A wide yield spread between short and long term bonds is usually cited as an indication of strong future economic growth. Others say it is an indication of rising inflation expectations. Both views can be correct. The pattern is caused by central banks pumping substantial amounts of liquidity into the financial system. This shows up in the economy and inflation at different points in time. Liquidity first pushes up the stock market (we have already seen that), next impacts the economy, and then shows up as inflation. When there is overlap between the economic growth and inflation phases, stagflation results. It can take as much as three to four years for the first wave of inflation to peak. That would take us to at least 2012 in the current cycle - so we have a long interest rate rally ahead of us.
Disclosure: Long TBT and TMV.
NEXT: GDP Revisons Indicate Recession Isn't Over
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Monday, May 18, 2009
Market Meltup in Mumbai
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.Our Video Related to this Blog:
Last night, half way around the world in Mumbai, the hyperinflation early warning system sounded the alarm. The major Indian stock index, the Sensex, exploded up over 17% in a short period of the time. The market had to be closed because circuit breakers were triggered by the stock buying panic that sent the market into a meltup. What set off the bull frenzy? The ruling Congress party retained power in the recent elections - a relatively ordinary event. The stockplosion on the subcontinent should make every investor realize that India is a market awash with massive liquidity, otherwise a big market move like this would not be possible. India moreover is by no means unique, it's just early. The excess liquidity there is part of a global phenomenon that could create an inflation tsunami that raises or wipes out asset values throughout the world.
Despite what the mainstream media tells you, liquidity is what moves markets. The economy can be in the tank and staying there, but if there is a lot of liquidity in the system, stock prices can and do go up. The New York Investing meetup has constantly demonstrated at our meetings that the Fed is pumping liquidity into the U.S. banking system that is 10 to 50 times greater than anything during the last half century. Many economic 'experts' (mostly the same people who didn't see the credit crisis coming) are optimistic that somehow all of this huge money creation is magically not going to result in a massive inflation surge that is like nothing the world has ever seen. The events in Mumbai last night are telling us otherwise.
Hard assets are the investments of choice during inflationary times. Gold, silver, oil, and food are the four pillars of investing during these periods. The price of stocks go up as well because the price of everything goes up, although they are rarely the best performing asset class. You want to get into inflation sensitive investments early and you want to wait once you do. Based on last nights events, it is quite possible that the wait won't be that long.
The New York Investing meetup is having a class on Inflation Investing Tuesday May 19th. For more information, please see the website: http://investing.meetup.com/21.
NEXT: Market Puts on Inflation Trade Becuase of Mumbai Mamba
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Economic Statistics are Yesterday, Stock Prices are Tomorrow
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.Our Video Related to this Blog:
The Fed Beige book was released yesterday and the media reported that it saw a glimmer of hope for economic recover in the U.S. That glimmer is not yet showing up in the economic statistics, which are gloomy worldwide not just in the U.S. However the economic statistics are backward looking and usually dated on top of that by the time they are released. While the report may say March, those numbers really might be from February (or even January). Reports of Q1 activity might actually be data from Q4 at the end of the previous year (this became glaringly obvious in the 3rd quarter of 2005 when hurricane Katrina devastated the U.S. economy and the GDP figures for the quarter then came out higher than had originally been expected, but the 4th quarter GDP was much lower). People get confused when the stock market is already going up when the news is at its worse, but this makes perfect sense. The economic news you are seeing may be from two quarters in the past, while the market is being priced for what it it thinks is going to happen two quarters in the future. When making investing decisions you too should always look forward.
To make investing even more difficult for the average investor, the media constantly inaccurately states that the stock market (or oil market or some other market) can't go up until the economy improves. Historical analysis indicates that this is simply not true. Liquidity drives stock prices. The more money available for buying stocks, the more the market goes up - and this can happen when the economy stays in bad shape for a long time. Liquidity almost always revives the economy as well so eventually a recovery takes place there too (a hyperinflationary depression would be the one exception). The amount of liquidity being pumped into the financial system currently is massive by any historical standard. This is going to be reflected in the stock market first and much later on at Starbucks, where you will be paying $50 for a cup of coffee.
No matter how bad things are, markets also can't go down forever. Eventually there comes a point where everyone who is going to sell has sold. When that happens one little piece of even insignificant good news can drive the market up suddenly and sharply (look for this behavior in the natural gas market in the future). This type of rally is short-covering or if it takes place around an important support level (it doesn't have to) will be called technical. For extremely oversold markets like the one we have now, a rally to the 200-day moving average is common. You should certainly consider taking profits around that level. Also watch for stocks or sectors with a lot of stocks that manage to break through and stay above the 200-day. These are the leaders for the future.
History (something completely unknown to most U.S. financial reporters) tells you a lot about how to successfully make money in the market. Go back and read the news from June 1932. You will see the worse economic news imaginable. The U.S. economy and banking system were in total collapse. And the banking crisis didn't finally bottom until the spring of 1933, when many insolvent banks were closed down during the banking holiday, and the system wasn't stabilized until the implementation of deposit insurance in 1934. Should you have bought stocks in July 1932? If you did, you would have made around 100% in a few weeks.
NEXT: Bull Markets Climb a Wall of Worry
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Monday, October 20, 2008
When the Lender of Last Resort Becomes the Only Resort
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Stock Market Rallies Like It's 1932
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.Our Video Related to this Blog:
Increases in liquidity show up in the stock market immediately and in the economy months later, but are not fully reflected in the inflation rate until years later. Yesterday's promise of UNLIMITED liquidity for the banking system in Europe (backed up by the U.S. Fed) along with the announcement of several trillion dollars in financial company bailout programs created the biggest global stock market rally ever. The future effects on the global economy remain to be seen. The likely biggest global inflation ever will not be showing up for awhile.
The Dow was up 936 points yesterday or 11.1% to close at 9387. The S&P500 was up 104 points or 11.6% and reclaimed the 1000 level by closing at 1003. Nasdaq rose 195 points to 1844 and was up 11.8%. Small caps, which have held up better than any of the other indices saw the smallest rise, with the Russell 2000 up 48 points or 9.3%. Before the rally, the Dow had fallen 40.3% from the high that it had reached on October 9, 2007 (a bigger percentage loss than in the 2000 to 2002 bear market) and had fallen eight consecutive days for a loss of 22.1%. While the points gains were impressive on Monday, the volume was nothing to write home about. Nasdaq only managed to break just above its average daily volume level at the close. Volume on the Dow was more enthusiastic, but not spectacular. Although yesterday's point rally in U.S. stocks was the biggest ever, in percentage terms it was not. Comparable and even bigger rallies took place in the U.S. during the 1930s Great Depression, but have not been seen since.
A rally of similar magnitude to the one in the U.S. took place in the world's other bourses as well. In Europe, the FTSE 100 in the UK was up 8.3%, the CAC-40 in France up 11.2% and the DAX in Germany was up 11.4%. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong rallied 10.2%. Japan was closed on Monday, but got two days of rallying in by rising 14.2% when it reopened on Tuesday. The Nikkei was trying to test test its 2003 low (which took 12 years of selling for it to reach) of just above 7600 last week. If it can manage not to break it in the next few months, the Japanese stock market may finally have bottomed after almost two decades.
Options expire this Friday and the current rally is likely to be sustained until this support for the market runs out (since August 2007, options expiration week has been the time for major stock rallies in the U.S). Today is already starting out as another big day for stocks, but be ready for any possibility. Extremely big rallies, which are typical of bear markets, are not necessarily good news. They certainly weren't during the Great Depression.
NEXT: So Much for That RallyDaryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.





