When Silence Isn't Golden

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Global terrorism reared it ugly head again with the horrific attacks in Mumbai in the last two days and the foiling of a plot to blow up Long Island railroad trains in New York City. One reason Mumbai seems to have been targeted is that it is the financial capital of India. If they had their way, the forces behind the terrorist threat would establish a totalitarian theocracy that would bring us back both socially and economically to the Middle Ages. It is not surprising that they would want to destroy the symbols of opulence created by capitalism. Unfortunately, the government-financial complex of the world's industrial economies has done more in this regard in the last few years than the terrorists could ever do.

The forces of ignorance though have not been extirpated in the U.S. by any means and I have a personal experience that took place at the same time to confirm this. An economics blog that is part of a well-known 'educational' site quoted an entire paragraph commentary of mine (my name was not mentioned) dealing with how people need to know the truth about the credit crisis and the state of the economy. This economics 'expert' for this site replied to my claims with the assertion that people who make such negative statements and predictions (doesn't matter whether or not they are true apparently) are helping to cause the economic problems the U.S. is experiencing! If markets and democracies can function without people having access to the truth, I am unaware of it. And of course, if you extend this logic, the less bad things the public knows about a company, the better off the investors will be (Enron actually made claims similar to this by the way).

Despite my best efforts at trying to spread reality throughout the land, the recently released U.S. consumer confidence number increased slightly from last months record low. Apparently it was falling energy prices that caused the slight uptick. Consumer views of current conditions however worsened even further in the November report. The October durable goods report didn't help create a rosy picture either. There was a 6.2% plunge following a 3.3% drop in September. On the consumer side, September was the month when purchases of asset backed paper for credit cards literally came to a halt - meaning no ability on the part of the big banks to fund any additional credit card debt to keep the American economy going (hence the sudden change in emphasis for TARP that was announced recently). Year over year delinquencies in credit card payments rose 17% and charge offs 45%.

Investor confidence in the state of the economy seems to have fallen to new lows if you consider that corporate bonds in the U.S and Europe have the highest yield ever relative to government debt. And while Citigroup is busy imploding, it just issued a report on its predictions for the gold market in the next two years. Citi is predicting gold could rise to $2000 an ounce (something New York Investing predicted many months ago). Their reasoning is that all the liquidity being pumped into the financial system is going to be highly inflationary (something New York Investing first said in September 2007). Rumors that China might increase its gold holdings from 600 to 4000 tons in order to help reduce its large dollar holdings (something else New York Investing mentioned as a possibility many months ago) seems to have contributed to Citi's bullish call on gold. All in all a clear pattern seems to be emerging - if only New York Investing would just shut up and stop making predictions, none of these things would happen and everything would just be fine - not!

NEXT: Synchronized Contractions Give Birth to Global Recession

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Black (Plague) Friday for Retail

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Profit for most U.S. retailers is determined by sales from the day after Thanksgiving (known as Black Friday) to the end of the year. There is an old saw in the trade that retailers actually lose money up to Thanksgiving day, and that shopping the next day determines the tone for the holiday season. As of now, that tone looks like it's going to be pretty cacophonous. Retail sales are being hit by a negative wealth effect caused by declining home and stock prices and a reduction in employment and available consumer credit. Without a good holiday shopping season, a wave of retail bankruptcies should be expected next spring - and this is one industry the Fed is not likely to bail out.

This past spring there were eight mostly mid-size retailers that went under, including Sharper Image, Levitz, Fortunoff and Linen 'n Things. In July the department store chain Mervyns declared bankruptcy and on November 11th, Circuit City. Crushing debt levels accumulated during the credit craze days in the early 2000s is what led to the first bankruptcy filings. The high debt load, which is common throughout the industry, combined with a tanking U.S economy will be responsible for the much bigger number of retail failures next year. The set up for Black Friday is bleak. In October, the consumer confidence figures were the lowest on record, literally falling off a cliff. Consumer spending plunged 1%. Same store sales were the worse in 35 years, with apparel retailers generally suffering the most. Discounters, such as Walmart did well however.

Don't expect relief from home prices or the stock market either. The just released Case-Shiller report has U.S. home prices falling 16.6% year over year in the third quarter. The stock market may close the year with the biggest drop on record, although it's too early to make that call. S&P 500 earnings were estimated to be down 21% in October, with financial and consumer discretionary firms bearing the brunt of the losses. Amazingly, brokerage analyst earnings estimates for 2009 have S&P profits increasing 17%, even though many of their own companies are only surviving because they are on the government dole. Recent reports have also indicated hefty outflows from mutual funds, close to 20% of the total so far this year, with investors increasingly losing confidence in the U.S. stock market.

Historians estimate that there was a 35% chance of surviving the bubonic form of the Black Plague during the Middle Ages. Hopefully, the survival rate in U.S. retail will be higher than that. Even healthier chains are closing large numbers of stores however. This pattern is likely to accelerate further and not just because of the bad economy. Rising real estate values have increased rents and have made the break even point for profit much higher than it used to be, just as sales are falling. The Internet of course, offers a cheaper alternative. Expect a lot of empty stores in the future. Also a lot less jobs in the industry. This in and of itself has major implications since retail is the largest employer in the private sector.

NEXT: When Silence Isn't Golden

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Geithner's appointment to Treasury - a Golden Opportunity

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The market turnaround last Friday afternoon was reported by the financial media as resulting from the announcement that the head of the New York Fed, Timothy Geithner, would be appointed by President elect Obama as his Treasury Secretary. It would indeed be reasonable for Wall Street to cheer Geithner's appointment and the future team of takover Timothy and bailout Benny. It sent a very clear message that the new administration's policies will be to rescue any and every company needing it. While stocks rallied sharply on this news, the inflation hedges gold and silver rallied even more - and for good reason.

Geithner was the mastermind behind the AIG and Bear Stearns deals. In the case of AIG the company was nationalized by paying 10 times the market price for the U.S. taxpayer's share (if this had been a private deal he would have been sued for malfeasance). Bear Stearns was valued well below market value as a gift to JP Morgan Chase (which has a seat on the New York Fed Board of Directors by the way). Taxpayers just got to guarantee Bear's toxic loans and were left holding the bag. While most news media reported that Geithner was in favor of bailing out Lehman Brothers, this was apparently not the case. People who were on the scene at the negotiations claim otherwise. It is now widely acknowledged that allowing Lehman to fail is what has led to the market turmoil in the last two months. The PR campaign to build up Geithner obviously felt it important to rewrite history and in doing so made it clear that a universal U.S. government bailout policy was in our future.

Despite the momentary trouble that the automakers are having in Washington on getting in on the government gravy train and the failure to bail out Lehman (somewhat similar to the failure of the Fed to bail out the Bank of the United States in 1930, which had disastrous consequences), short of complete nationalization, the U.S. government couldn't do much more to support financial firms other than pump even more money into them (this will indeed be happening). Over the weekend the government guaranteed the most worthless one-sixth of Citigroup's assets. Today, the Fed announced a $600 billion program to support the mortgage market, $100 billion for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (two other financial black holes for government money) and $500 billion to purchase mortgage backed securities. Additionally, the Fed will lend up to $200 billion to the holders of securities backed by various types of consumer loans. So that's another $800 billion just for today. The total in the last year is way into the many trillions and you many assume most if not all of that is freshly printed money.

The implications of these moves have not gone unnoticed in the markets. Inflation sensitive silver rallied more than any stock index on both Friday and Monday. Gold, which has not been terribly damaged in the sell off during the last two months, and beaten down oil also had good rallies. The charts for gold and silver are much healthier looking than those for the major stock indices. Sustainable rallies are possible for both, while stocks look like they will need to do more work to get to that point.

NEXT: A Black (Plague) Friday for Retail

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Citi That Should be Put to Sleep

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

A constant refrain that has been heard from the New York Investing meetup since the Credit Crisis began is "there is no such thing as one bailout for an insolvent financial institution". If there was a poster for credit crisis relief, Citibank's picture would be on it with words underneath, "Can you bail me out? We accept funds from Arab sheiks, sovereign wealth funds, foreign banks, the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, the FDIC, and any welfare program for banks the government can invent - and we take food stamps". As with the daily crashes in the stock market,the bailouts for Citibank have become so common it's easy to lose track of them. From the end of 2007 into the spring of 2008 there were five different bailouts five months in a row. The Fed has pumped substantial amounts into the bank through its various lending facilities. Citi got the biggest chunk of funds from the TARP bill just recently. The 'success' of these efforts came to fruition last week when Citi (C) stock went into a death spiral losing 60% of its value to close at $3.77 (it was over $55 last year).

But not to worry, the U.S. government brain trust that has come up with one ineffective failed program after another to handle the credit crisis put together a bailout package for Citi over the weekend. If they are lucky, this one will work for more than just weeks, but will stabilize things for months before the next rescue package is needed (consider this to be the optimistic scenario). Citi will get another immediate cash infusion of $20 billion from TARP funds. Treasury and the FDIC will guarantee against the "possibility of unusually large losses" on up to $306 billion of risky (a code word for worthless) loans and securities backed by residential and commercial mortgages (please note that commercial mortgages are now collapsing). Citi will assume the first $29 billion in losses on this risky pool of assets. Beyond that amount, the government would absorb 90 percent of the remaining losses, and Citi 10 percent. Money from TARP and funds from the FDIC would cover the government's portion of potential losses (this is deposit insurance money). The Federal Reserve would finance the remaining assets with a loan to Citigroup of freshly printed dollars.

So that this bailout doesn't look like the handout that it is, the U.S. government is getting $7 billion in preferred shares of Citigroup. In addition, Citi will issue warrants to the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC for approximately 254 million shares of the company's common stock (4.5% of the total) at a strike price of $10.61. It is of course possible the Citi stock could hit this level, especially if the U.S. government provides at least $10.61 of funding per share. Citigroup is also barred from paying quarterly dividends to shareholders of more than 1 cent a share for three years (it makes no sense that it should be allowed to pay any dividends, since they are being funded by the U.S. taxpayer). Citi has to additionally take steps to help distressed homeowners.

New York Investing has repeatedly said in its talks in the last year that Citi is too big to fail and the government will bail it out no matter how big a financial black hole it is. This sentiment was echoed in press coverage of the most recent bailout effort with financial commentators saying things such as"If they didn't help, the damage would be beyond imagination" and "It would create chaos [if there hadn't been a bailout]". We have also discussed how Japan followed similar policies with it banks in the 1990s and 2000s. During that time, the Japanese economy has been unable to recover and the stock market has sold off for 18 years. U.S. policy makers will have to come up with a different approach than the one used by the Japanese if they want to avoid this scenario in the U.S. So far, they haven't.

NEXT: Geithner's Appointment to Treasury, A Golden Opportunity

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Five Year Lows are Bad, Eleven Year Lows are Worse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

On Wednesday the Dow hit a five year low. Yesterday the S&P500 broke its key long term support around 775 to hit an eleven year low. The import of this event should not be underestimated. The market sell off that began in the spring of 2000 and which first ended after two and a half years has now been extended to eight and a half years - at least for the S&P500. The Dow and Nasdaq have still not broken their 2002 lows, but the Dow is close to doing so and this would represent another violation of key support that would have ugly implicatons for future stock prices. The Nasdaq is holding well above this support level, but this provides scant comfort considering that that this represents an approximately 78% drop from its 2000 high.

The market statistics for this year alone are already devastating enough. After Thursday's drop the Dow Jones is down 43%, the S&P 500 49% and the Nasdaq 50% in less than eleven months. The S&P's drop matches the one that took two entire years in the crushing market sell off in 1973/74. As of now, it is worse than the 47% drop in 1931 - the year with the biggest drop in stock prices during the Great Depression. All the U.S. indicies had crash level drops once again yesterday, but in an unusal pattern the S&P fell the most with a 6.7% loss and the Nasdaq the least with a 5.1% drop. For the record the closing prices were 7552 on the Dow, 752 on the S&P 500, 1316 on the Nasdaq and 385 on the Russell 2000.

Financial stocks bore the brunt of the selling with Citigroup losing 24% after a 23% loss the day before. Citi closed at 4.71 even after (or possibly because) Saudi prince Al-Waleed said he would raise his stake in the bank back to 5% (this was the amount he has held for many years and if he has to buy to get back to this level, he has obviously been selling recently). Citi announced this morning that it was considering auctioning off the firm in parts or selling itself wholesale. It also requested the SEC ban short selling on its stock again. JP Morgan was damaged almost as much as Citi, with a 18% decline and Bank America did a little better dropping only 14%. GE was down 11%. Morgan Stanley and Goldman fell 10% and 6% respectively. While Goldman did a little better at the close, its intraday low at 49.00 was a much bigger drop. Morgan Stanley fell back into the single digits. So much for TARP, the Wall Street welfare bill, that was supposed to save the financial system from a meltdown.

Wiffs of panic in the financial system were palpable yesterday. The VIX (the volatility index) closed over 80. Interest rates on 3-month T-bills fell to 0.1% in flight to safety buying. A little better than the brief negative interest rate on the 1-month T-bill reached awhile ago, but not by much. Oil continued its relentless decline, falling to $49.42 a barrell. Weekly jobless claims spiked to a 16 year high of 542,000, with continuing claims the highest since 1982 (less than half of employed workers in the U.S. are eligible for unemployment by the way, so you may want to double all numbers to get a more realistic picture of the U.S. employment situation). One market commentator ventured that the current slowdown could be the "worse since the Great Depression". Perhaps he should have used the word than.

NEXT: The Citi that Should be Put to Sleep

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Must Hold in Here

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The major U.S. stock indices hit five year lows yesterday. The Dow and the S&P 500 are now going to test their 2002 lows, also the 1998 low in the case of the Dow, around 7200 and 775 respectively (mentioned many times in this blog as the target price to look out for). Nasdaq is heading toward a support level in the 1250 to 1300 range, the shoulder area of the reverse head and shoulder pattern that it made in 2002 to 2003. Its stronger support is around 1100. This would be the next place to look for a market sell off to stop. The Dow, and even more likely the S&P, would be below their 2002 lows if this happened. The charts offer little guidance for any significant breaks of the 2002 lows, since there is no significant support until much, much lower levels.

Once again yesterday was a crash day, with all the major U.S. indices closing down 5% or more. I have lost count how many times this has happened in the last three months. The gains from last Thursday's mystery rally were completely dissipated in four trading days. The Dow held up the best with only a 5.1% drop, but closed at 7997, the first close below 8000 since 2003. Small caps were the hardest hit, with the Russell 2000 falling 7.9%. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq were in between with 6.1% and 6.5% drops respectively. Financial stocks had the biggest losses, with Citibank leading the way down with a 23% loss (the New York Investing meetup has been saying since fall of 2007 that Citi is insolvent and the market is now realizing it). Bank America, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, and Goldman Sachs all had 10% or greater drops. GE, the next major bailout prospect, fell 10%. Autos of course were also hit hard, with GM falling 10% and Ford 25%. Ford barely remained above penny stock levels.

What is currently roiling the market, other than the usual unrelentingly bad economic news, was that the bailout prospects for the auto industry fell apart on Capitol Hill yesterday. Members of congress grilled the auto chieftains on their extravagant spending, including the private jet trips they took to the hearings. While there is certainly profligacy in auto company spending, it can't compare to Wall Street. The TARP legislation failed to eliminate multi-million (or even deca-million) bonuses given to Wall Street management, their high salaries, lavish executive perks as was revealed recently with AIG, nor the dividends they are paying to their shareholders with government bailout money. Suddenly Congress has discovered that taxpayer money shouldn't be wasted irresponsibly with auto companies (whose political contributions can't match Wall Street's). While overall this is certainly a good thing, the economic impact of all the major U.S. auto companies going into bankruptcy should not be underestimated. Market action yesterday made that very clear.

Having a policy of selective government bailouts is the worse of all choices. A government can bail out no company if it wants to maintain a free market system or it can bailout every company if it doesn't. The government certainly shouldn't do bailouts based on political favoritism. At hit or miss bailout policy also is likely to insure the least results for the most money spent -. something the U.S. government has proven particularly adept at in the last several years.

NEXT: Five Year Lows are Bad, Eleven Year Lows are Worse

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

PPI and CPI - Don't Get Excited Just Yet

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Yesterday the PPI (producer price index) indicated that wholesale prices dropped 2.8% in October, the biggest one-month decline in the 60 years that this data series has been in existence. Today the CPI (consumer price index) report had consumer prices falling 1.0% last month, the biggest monthly drop in its 61 year history. One item alone, energy prices, made a disproportionate contribution to falling prices. Oil has dropped over 60% from its high in July and gasoline prices in the U.S. are down around 50% from their top the same month, having dropped an unprecedented 60 days in a row (with sharp decreases just before the election). This entire drop is still not fully reflected in PPI and CPI and is likely not yet over either, so expect further drops in both in the next couple of months.

Core inflation (inflation minus food and energy) painted a very different picture from the headline numbers however. PPI core rose 0.4% on the month. CPI core fell only 0.1%. There is also no year over year deflation either. Prices for finished producer goods have risen 5.2% in the last year and consumer prices are up 3.7%. At least these are the official numbers. The New York Investing meetup has demonstrated several times in its meetings how consumer price inflation is significantly understated by the U.S. government. Falling prices based on drops in commodity prices also have their limitations. While there is no maximum to commodity prices, there is a minimum which is determined by the cost of production. As this is approached, less efficient wells and mines are closed down. New projects are postponed. Supply falls so that profitable prices are maintained.

How does this compare to the deflation that took place in the early 1930s during the Great Depression? Estimates are that U.S. consumer prices fell approximately 3% in 1930, 9% in 1931 and 11% in 1932 (the bottom year). Production output was also falling by similar amounts during this period. Similar drops in prices and production took place in a number of countries. The one common denominator among these countries was a fixed-exchange rate gold standard and not the inherently inflationary fiat currency standards that now prevails throughout the world. Big increases in money supply, which are inflationary, are not sustainable under a gold standard, but can now take place in seconds by hitting the enter key on a computer keyboard. While the U.S. monetary authorities actually supported deflation by constricting the money supply at the beginning of the Depression, today they are doing everything possible to expand the money supply and create inflation.

Nevertheless, there are a large number of people who maintain that deflation is taking hold in the U.S and will only get worse over time. The crux of their argument is usually that bank credit is in collapse and the amount of bank credit available determines inflation or deflation (not rising or falling consumer prices, which is everyone else's definition) . They also frequently claim that inflation is led by rising wages and can't take hold otherwise. This was indeed true in the U.S during the 1970s, but apparently unbeknownst to these people, history began before that decade. Large inflations have existed since at least the Roman Empire and have taken many forms. As for Wiemar Germany, the one case of hyperinflation so far in an advanced industrial economy, there doesn't seem to have been any major increase in bank credit, which would be required in the deflationists world view. The government simply spent money it didn't have and had to keep printing more and more currency to keep up. For something like this to happen in the here and now, the U.S would have to be running larger and larger budget deficits and the national debt would have to be skyrocketing. Or in other words, exactly what is taking place.

NEXT: Market Must Hold In Here

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Trojan Horse of Earnings Surprises

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Last spring Ford reported an unexpected profit. Even though this was inconsistent with almost all other information about the auto industry at the time,which was indicating serious collapse, the press trumpeted Ford's superior performance and that happy days were here again for the company. The stock shot up. Billionaire Kirk Kerkorian who had begun buying Ford stock in early April, announced he was willing to buy another 20 million shares at $8.50. The stock closed at $1.72 yesterday. The auto companies are now fighting for their lives trying to get desperately needed bailout money from Washington to prevent impending bankruptcies. Shareholders could get wiped out.

This morning Hewlett Packard announced surprisingly good earnings. This also seems inconsistent with reports from the rest of the industry. Intel, which has a broad international market similar to HP's was gloomy in its outlook in October. Nevertheless, HP stock shot up 15% in premarket trading and this helped prevent a drop on the open that could have sent the indices to new lows. HP's justification for its better than expected profits is that it sells printers and computers all over the world and this insulates it from economic problems in the U.S. An interesting statement considering that Intel and many other tech companies can say the same, but they are either already having problems or are negative on future business prospects. Unfortunately, the 'magic' that HP is using to produce its great numbers can't be deconstructed yet, since the full details will not be released until November 24th (Thanksgiving week when many traders in the U.S. will be away).

U.S. stock indices are once again scrapping along the bottom. All the gains from last Thursday's sudden explosive and still unexplained turnaround have not yet been dissipated, but they could be soon. A pattern of a big rally and then losing the gains in three to seven trading days seems to be the current norm. All the major indices have made three passes around their lows so far. The Nasdaq and Russell 2000 have made succeeding lower lows, while the S&P 500 tried to put in a double bottom and then made a lower low last Thursday. The Dow put in its low so far on October 10th and then has been trying to put in a double bottom subsequently. The technical picture has been improving somewhat, but in a major bear market like the one we are in, the technicals should look really good before you can put any store in them. Lows so far are 7774 on the Dow, 819 on the S&P and 1429 on the Nasdaq.

The current drama going on about the proposed auto bailout in Washington should be watched carefully. A bankruptcy filing for one of the major auto companies would be as devastating to the U.S. economy as Lehman's filing was for the stock and fixed-income markets after it took place in mid-September (the Depression era equivalent was when the Fed refused to bail out the New York Bank of the United States and this caused a chain reaction of bank and business failures throughout the economy). The lame-duck two month period between the presidential election and the new administration is a risky one for both the economy and the markets. No matter what happens, little government action should be expected.

NEXT: PPI and CPI - Don't Get Excited Just Yet

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

T & A and the GS-20 Summit

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Last Wednesday Treasury Secretary Paulson announced the T&A would be taken out of TARP (the Wall Street bailout bill passed in early October). The raison d'etre given by the Bush administration to congress for passing TARP was that only by purchasing troubled assets on bank balance sheets could banks be freed up to lend again and get the economy going. After the legislation was passed, congressional leadership from both parties announced with great fanfare how they were saving the American economy with this program. The ink was barely dry on the bill however, before Paulson announced that preferred stock was going to be purchased in troubled financial institutions instead. While the first $250 billion will still be earmarked for that purpose, Paulson has now decided that the remaining funds should be used to support financial markets that supply credit for credit card debt, auto loans and student loans. Of course next week, there might be a better way to save the American economy and the six week old program could be changed even again. If all this looks like no one in Washington has the slightest idea what they are doing, it's because they don't.

This is not to say that the new ideas for TARP are not an improvement on the original provisions of the bill which were essentially a form of welfare for Wall Street. Unlike welfare for the poor though, welfare for the rich comes with fewer limitations. While TARP has a provision for 'restriction' of bonuses, it doesn't eliminate them, nor does it force companies that can't continue to exist without government support to pay their executives salaries that top government officials would get. Nevertheless, over the weekend seven top Goldman Sachs (Paulson's old firm) managers graciously renounced their bonuses for 2008. Why they would have been getting bonuses when the company's stock has fallen 70% in the last twelve months is not exactly clear. CEO Lloyd Blankfein received a Wall Street record $68 million bonus last year when he was making the decisions that lead to this year's disastrous performance.

Like everything else in the contemporary economy, lack of effective ideas for handling the credit crisis is global as well. The GS-20 meeting of world leaders this weekend in Washington produced mostly a commitment to free trade and further monetary and fiscal stimulus (in other words governments throughout the world are going to print more paper money which will be backed by nothing other than their leaders hot air). British PM Gordon Brown, who decided to sell half of Britain's gold at the bottom of the market in 1999 and has presided over a worse subprime crisis than in the U.S., led the charge for increased stimulus measures. Other ideas bandied about included multinational supervision for global banks, more oversight for credit rating agencies and regulation for hedge funds. These useful suggestions didn't get much beyond the bandying stage however. Essentially anything concrete was put off until the next meeting in April. The do-nothing summit was immediately declared a success by President Bush.

Shortly thereafter, Japan announced a second quarter of negative GDP confirming it was in recession as the euro zone did last Friday. Since this was not exactly surprising news, Asian markets were little changed overnight, even despite the drop in the U.S. on Friday. The out of the blue rally in American markets last Thursday faded almost as quickly as it arriveed with the Dow down 3.8% and the Nasdaq down 5.0%. Technically speaking this was another crash day on the Nasdaq, but as I have said many times, no one pays attention anymore to just a 5% or 6% drop - and that includes world leaders.

NEXT: Trojan Horse of Earnings Surprises

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Trader of Last Resort

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Yesterday, a spectacular market rally took place once again. This is the third time in approximately a month that the Dow has had close to a 1000 point intraday rally. The last such rally took place on October 28th and conveniently rallied the market right into election day. That rally fell apart the moment the voting was over, with the market experiencing the biggest two-day back to back price drop since 1987. While the Fed rate cut was allegedly the reason for the late October move up, the motivation for yesterday's out of the blue rally is not immediately evident.

The economic news was bad before the market opened and only got worse during the day. Big caps Intel and Walmart had already lowered earnings expectations. The weekly unemployment report showed a way above expectations 516,000 new claims for unemployment, which matched the post-911 figures when the U.S. economy briefly ground to a halt. Continuing claims hit a level last seen during the deep recessionary early 1980s. Next came the Trade Deficit. Its figures showed that even though there was a drop in imports last month, the drop in exports was even bigger. The drop in the price of oil was a major cause of the import drop, while the export drop seemed to be more the consequence of a declining global economy. The impact of the rising U.S. dollar, already reflected in oil prices seems to have yet to have fully impacted U.S. exports. Expect that it will be doing so in the not too distant future. Finally, the Budget Deficit numbers for October were released and there was a record monthly deficit of $237 billion (actually $662 billion or 55% of GDP if you exclude the money looted from the social security and other trust funds). For fiscal year 2008, which ended on September 30th, the entire yearly deficit was only $455 billion.

It is not surprising in the least that the market sold off on this news and that a rally attempt in the morning failed. By the beginning of the afternoon, the Nasdaq, S&P 500, and the Russell 2000 all hit new yearly lows and the Dow was getting close to doing so. Market stalwarts, like Citigroup, General Electric and Goldman Sachs were in collapse mode, falling to 8.27, 14.58, and 61.02 respectively. The technical picture was breaking down. Suddenly at 1:00 o'clock the market turned around. Was major support hit? No. Was there release of some good news? No. Could things have become much worse if something wasn't done? Yes. Was the PPT involved? In all likelihood.

The quasi-secret Plunge Protection Team (PPT), officially known as the Working Group on Capital Markets, was created by a presidential executive order from Ronald Regan shortly after the 1987 market meltdown. It's purpose was originally to prevent similar crashes in the future. This Regan/Greenspan effort expanded the Fed's role as the lender of last resort to include 'trader of last resort'. It should be assumed that a lot of seemingly illogical trading behavior that has taken place since the credit crisis began can be traced to the efforts of the PPT. Yesterday's rally has many of the earmarks of recent PPT behavior. Timing in the afternoon at 1:00, 2:00, 2:15, 2:30. Rallies starting for no reason or for reasons that are already known. Rallies starting after chart support is broken with the market becoming vulnerable to a much bigger drop. Rallies taking place at politically convenient times. While there are major ethical problems with the government interfering with free-market trading, there is also the problem that it only works short-term. Any PPT generated rally will inevitably lead to lower lows as the Japanese have discovered over time with their government based market interference. Their stock market has taken 18 years so far to hit bottom - and the U.S. may be setting itself up for a similar future.

NEXT: T & A and the GS-20 Summit

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Market Tests Low as Global Recession Predicted

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) is now forecasting GDP will fall 0.3% overall during 2009 in the 30 market economies it tracks. This is down from this June's prediction of 1.7% growth for next year. According to the OECD, 2009 will be the first time since the mid-70s that the U.S., Europe, and Japan are in recession. In all likelihood the global recession has already been well underway in 2008. Just last night, Germany reported negative GDP for the second quarter in a row. France and Italy should follow with similar results. The U.S. already reported negative GDP for one quarter and now that the presidential election is over the reported GDP numbers should get much worse. China, while not in danger of recession yet, reported a sharp decline in industrial production yesterday with growth slowing from 11.4% to 8.2%.

Despite the dismal economic numbers coming out of China, the Shanghai Composite was up 3.7% last night on hopes of a bigger stimulus package from the government. Hope didn't cross the Chinese border however and all other Eastern indices closed down. The Nikkei in Japan and the Hang Seng in Hong Kong were down 5.5% and 5.2% respectively - technically another crash day, but it would take a much bigger drop than that to get any ones attention these days. Australia lost 5% and Korea was down 7% at the low, but recovered enough to be off only 3.2% at the close. The Yen rallied against the dollar and oil fell as low as $56.06 during Asian trading.

The recession news out of Germany hammered the euro and the pound. The euro was as low as 1.2388 and the pound fell to 1.497 at one point. The DAX has hoovered around the unchanged mark for most of the day so far and the CAC-40 in France is actually up, while the FTSE is down marginally. Oil fell as low as $54.67 (on its way to $50 and probably $40 as mentioned in this blog previously). The dollar has been rallying against euro currencies because the U.S. economy is supposedly in much better shape than the euro zone economies. In reality, the U.S is only better at producing false GDP figures that overstate its economic growth. As long as the market is willing to trade on this fiction, expect it to continue.

The stock markets in the U.S. came close to their recent lows yesterday and should be watched carefully at this point. The Nasdaq was down 5.2% and closed at 1499, just above its 1494 yearly bottom so far (there is support around 1500). The S&P 500 also dropped 5.2% and closed only 12 points above its previous low of 840. The Russell 2000 was the worst hit of all, dropping 6.1% and was only 9 points away from a new low at the close. The Dow was the only major index to have a less than crash level drop (just under 5.0%) and at 8282 was well above the 7774 level it hit in recent trading. Dow companies, Intel and Walmart then both lowered earnings expectations after yesterday's close. This news should propel the market lower. If the market can't hold its yearly lows look for the Dow to hold around 7200 and the S&P 500 around 775 (the 2002 lows). Many traders will be buying if they see these prices.

NEXT: The Trader of Last Resort

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

AIG - Bailing Out the Bailout... Again

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The New York Investing meetup has repeatedly said in its meetings that there is no such thing as one bailout for an insolvent financial company. If Fed Chair Bernanke or Treasury Secretary Paulson belonged to the group they might have realized that Dow stock AIG was likely to turn into the bailout black hole of taxpayer funding that it has become. AIG is now on its third government bailout in less than two months. In mid-September, it had originally requested a loan of $40 billion from the Fed which was turned down. Days later the Fed bought 80% of the company for $85 billion. (see our September 17th blog entry: The People's Republic of the U.S. - the AIG Bailout). The government had to throw in an additional $38 billion in October to keep the company afloat. AIG then reported a $24.5 billion loss, 80% owned by the American taxpayer, for the third quarter in early November and this necessitated the bailout to be totally restructured.

After the initial bailout, the federal government issued assurances that its actions had stabilized AIG - and indeed it did for a whole few weeks (the approximate see ahead time for the visionaries that currently run the U.S. Treasury department and Federal Reserve). Unfortunately, the way the government stabilized AIG helped destabilize the market. This occurred because there seems to have been a high interest attached to AIG's government funding, which was treated as a loan even though it involved the purchase of common stock. While this apparently makes no sense whatsoever, we are dealing with the government here so don't expect the ordinary rules of financial logic to apply. This high interest rate forced AIG to dump a lot of securities on to the market in late September and early October helping to exacerbate the post-Lehman bankruptcy meltdown that took place during that time.

In the $150 billion AIG bailout part 3, the amount of funding from the Fed will be reduced to $60 billion and the interest rate on this loan will be lowered as well. An additional $40 billion will come from TARP, aka the Wall Street welfare bill, for the purchase of preferred shares in AIG. The Treasury for once correctly stated that this would not increase the government's ownership in AIG, although Treasury has previously indicated that preferred stock, which is a perpetual loan, represented ownership rights in a company. Paulson has also indicated that funds from TARP would only go to 'healthy companies', not failing companies such as AIG (this of course begs the question of why a 'healthy company' would need government assistance). The government will also be funding a $20 billion dollar buy back of residential mortgage securities that AIG insures and $30 billion dollars for the purchase of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) for 5o cents on the dollar. It is CDO exposure that has financially ruined the company.

AIG has taken $100 billion or so in write downs so far. Its exposure to insurance for fixed-income investments fell from $441 billion to $372 billion after the governments first injection of $85 billion. Based on these figures, my guess is the the upper limit for bailing out the company is somewhere around $400 billion. Assuming of course they can cut down on using taxpayer funds for spa treatments for their executives and the one-million dollar a month payments they are making to former management who's decisions helped destroy the company.

NEXT: U.S. Market Tests Low as Global Recession Predicted

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Auto-Asphyxiation - GM, Ford Gasp for Bailout

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

No industry better symbolizes 20th century American commerce and culture than does autos. It was in the U.S. that mass production of cars were perfected by Henry Ford and the idea that the average person could own their own vehicle first took hold. It was widespread ownership of automobiles that allowed the post-World War II U.S. to become a suburban chain store nation. Now, the three remaining major U.S. auto companies no longer seem to be viable businesses and the implications are not just economic, but social and political as well .

The problems with the auto companies didn't just happen overnight, but first became evident in the 1970s. When oil prices started to soar, the American consumer turned away from the huge gas guzzlers that Detroit manufactured and the Japanese car companies with their fuel-efficient products gained major footholds in the U.S. market. Chrysler eventually needed a $675 million bailout in 1980 to continue operating. Detroit failed to heed the warning however and the lesson it learned from the events of the 1970s was that the government would bail it out if it messed up and it should try harder to get government restrictions and limitations on foreign imports. Auto industry lobbyists also subsequently did everything possible to overturn federal laws that mandated Detroit produce fuel efficient cars. So in the last ten years, this allowed them to saturate the U.S. market with low gas mileage SUV behemoths and pickup trucks. Now another completely predictable surge in fuel prices has taken place and the Japanese along with Korean auto manufacturers are there to pick up the pieces. An industry that has repeatedly lambasted government interference in its operations and used its political power to undo government programs that could have preserved its economic viability, now is begging the government to interfere by bailing it out.

This is not to imply that auto sales aren't hurting all around because of the economy - they are. Year over year industry sales were down 32% last month and while Ford was in line with a 30% drop, GM had a much worse 45% fall. Similar figures can be found for 1930, the first year of the Great Depression by the way (read that sentence again). GM has has been bleeding red ink since the end of 2004 with a total loss of $73 billion. Ford hasn't been much better off, but managed to report a surprise profit in the second quarter of this year. At that time the New York Investing meetup pointed out that this supposed profit was completely bogus, although the financial media trumpeted it with blaring good-news headlines. For a few days Ford's stock surged, but within weeks began to collapse. The low in Monday's trading was a $1.90 and GM had fallen to a new 50 plus year low of $3.02. GM stock dropped almost 25% on the day because it had announced that its 49% owned GMAC credit arm was likely to go under and its spun off part's supplier Delphi might not emerge from bankruptcy.

Bad earnings are not what forces companies into bankruptcy though. Running out of cash is what pushes them over the edge. By this criteria, GM is likely to go under sometime next spring and Ford might last a little longer. A massive government bailout for the entire industry is of course inevitable. The bailout actually started last year with $25 billion in loans in the 2007 energy bill and an additional $25 billion loan attached to a bill for funding for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars this September. Detroit now wants part of the Wall Street bailout bill money, although the Bush administration is hostile to this suggestion, so Detroit may have to wait until early 2009 to be saved from itself by the federal government.

NEXT: AIG - Bailing Out the Bail Out ... Again

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

China Bails Out Asia - at Least for Today

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of 20 (nineteen of the world's largest economies, plus the European Union) met in Brazil on Sunday and called for increased government spending to bolster the sagging global economy. The multi trillion dollar bailouts, massive liquidity injections, and sharp rate cuts in the last two months apparently haven't done the trick. To do its part, China promptly announced a $586 billion stimulus plan consisting of spending, subsidies, loser credit, and tax cuts. Unlike the rate cuts in Britain and the ECB last week, when the markets crashed the day they were announced, Asian markets rallied strongly on the news.

Not surprisingly, the Shanghai composite was up the most with a 7.3% gain. It is still down about two-thirds from its high last October, after rising in one of the most spectacular bubbles in history (bubble markets usually need somewhere between an 80% to 98% drop before they can stabilize). The Nikkei rose 5.8% on the news, after having hit a new low in its 18 year drop only recently. Intraday, the Nikkei has had approximately an 83% drop so far from its bubble high in 1990 to its current low. What the final number will be and when it will take place is anybody's guess. The Sensex in India, another bubble market, rose 5.8% as well. The dollar rallied against the Yen and natural resource stocks (inflation indicators) seemed to be the major beneficiaries of China's announcement. BHP Billiton, the world's biggest mining company was up 13%.

As the rally moved along with the sun to Europe, the enthusiasm dampened somewhat. Major European markets are up less than 3% as of this writing. U.S. pre-market futures indicate an even smaller rally here. Of course the Dow already rallied 2.8% on Friday, but this was after a two-day post election drop of around 10% (half of what would be necessary to create a bear market). The news of Circuit City's bankruptcy and AIG's third government bailout, with the total now up to $150 billion, will weigh on the U.S. market if rationality prevails - a dubious presumption at best.

In case there was any doubt previously, the economic policy makers for all the world's large economies are pursuing and will continue to pursue extreme inflationary policies. In many cases, this is being done to try to reinflate collapsing bubbles. There is no short-term likelihood of success in this endeavor. They will be successful however in igniting an inflation bubble. Although this is completely predictable, expect great surprise - and denial - when inflation starts to get out of control.

NEXT: Auto-Asphyxiation - GM, Ford Gasp for Bailout

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Employment Losses Revealed After the Election

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

When post-election government economic reports are released in the next several months, don't be surprised if conditions are much worse than those reported before the election. This shouldn't be interpreted as conditions having actually significantly deteriorated (although this is probably happening as well), but that there is now less motivation for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to fudge the figures to make them look better. The Employment Report released this morning is a case in point. While this report generally contains more fantasy than a Harry Potter novel, apparently there is some limit to the BLS's job conjuring . Now that the election is over, we find that unemployment shot up significantly in October and job losses for August and September were much higher than originally reported. Must be 'coincidence' that they missed reporting on those bigger job losses before people voted.

While the unemployment figures are still grossly understated, they are bad enough as is. A loss of 240,000 jobs took place in October and the official unemployment rate rose to 6.5% from 6.1%. September's job losses were revised upward to 248,000 from the previously reported 159,000 and August now has a loss of 127,000 jobs instead of 73,000. So far the number of jobs have shrunk every month this year and according to the BLS, the total loss is now 1.2 million. The official unemployment rate is now as bad as it got in the 2001 recession and is heading toward the higher levels of the 1991 recession (as you go back in time, each recession was worse in the U.S. until 1974).

Evidence that the BLS is underreporting unemployment can be found in the statistics for the number of people collecting unemployment insurance. It has already hit a 25 year high of 3.84 million, a level last reached in the devastating 1982 recession. Unemployment is paid by the states and there are already five states with insolvent unemployment trust funds and another eight states teetering on insolvency. To handle this situation, the federal government has been 'lending' the states money at very low interest rates. For their part, the states are trying to raise unemployment insurance rates paid by companies, many of which are having serious financial problems of their own (many states lowered unemployment insurance taxes when the economy was good and companies could afford to pay more). Few things are more certain than a number of state unemployment trust funds will need a major bailout by the federal government in the not too distant future.

While it should be axiomatic that a growing economy creates jobs and a deteriorating economy losses jobs, the U.S. government still has not acknowledged a recession exists even after 10 months of steep job losses. More proof of recession can be found in weekly unemployment claims. These were 481,000 last week and have been over the 400,000 level, usually considered the cutoff for an economic decline, for a long time. Perhaps now that the election is over one of the government's other great works of fantasy, the GDP report, will start to veer closer to reality.

NEXT: China Bails Out Asia - at Least for Today

Daryl Montgomery

Organizer, New York Investing meetup

http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

When Stimulus Ceases to be Stimulating

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Apparently Pavlov was right - and a better economist than anyone ever imagined. More than 100 years ago he noted that a stimulus has its greatest effect in the beginning and loses it impact if continually applied. Contemporary central bankers have apparently failed to appreciate the significance of this finding and its application to their field.

Early this morning New York time, the Bank of England cut interest rates 1.5%. While this may not be the biggest rate cut ever in nominal terms, it is enormous by any measure. The old rate was 4.75 and the new one is 3.25. Before the credit crisis began last year, a rate cut of this magnitude would have been enough to rally the market 10%, 15% or maybe even 20% in as little as a few days. However, as the credit crisis has proceeded, central banks rate cuts have lost their efficacy. The rallies that have resulted have become smaller and briefer. Today the FTSE 100 closed down 5.7%. Instead of the expected big rally, the London market crashed.

The Bank of England's grand rate cut gesture was a follow-up to the U.S. Fed's 50 basis point pre-election rate cut last week. While the Fed's cut helped prop up the American stock market into the voting, it could have done even more and there were rumors that it was considering 75 or even a 100 point cut (the remaining 25 or 50 basis point cut will probably be done at the next meeting). The ECB and the Swiss central bank decided to follow this more conservative approach today when they both cut 50 basis points also. Euro zone rates are now at 3.25%, above Britain's new 3.00% and well above the 1.00% in U.S. Counterintuitively, the trade weighted dollar rallied. This pattern has been seen since late July when funds have been flowing from high interest rate currencies to low interest rate currencies - something which seems to defy all logic.

Bourses on the continent suffered even more today than the British market, since they only had a big rate cut, instead of a truly huge rate cut to support stock prices. The German DAX was down 6.8% and the CAC-40 dropped 6.4%. The U.S. markets started selling as soon as they opened and hit a temporary bottom around 1:30, when the Dow was down more than 400 points and Nasdaq down over 70. Oil prices was hit even worse than stocks, with light sweet crude falling to $60.16 at one point. Don't be surprised if oil falls even further to 50 or even 40 in the future, although this may take awhile. In the shorter term, current levels are likely to be broken for stocks.

NEXT: Employment Losses Revealed After the Election

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Stock Market's Early Returns

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While the election doesn't appear to have resulted in the worse possible outcome for Wall Street, what did occur was interpreted by the market negatively enough to cause a small crash today. So far Obama has won the presidency by a 7% plurality, although based on turnout estimates several million votes seem to be missing from the tally. The Democrats have picked up at least five seats in the Senate and have solidified control, but the filibuster proof majority remains elusive for them. Four seats - Georgia, Minnesota, Oregon, and Alaska - are still undecided however. Currently the Republican is ahead by 500 votes or less in Minnesota and Alaska and recounts will be taking place. All the ballots haven't yet been counted in Oregon's mail-in-only election, but it looks like the Democrat will win when they are. As of now, Georgia is heading toward a run-off election next month because neither candidate got 50% of the vote. Alaska would have to have another election as well if convicted felon Stephens wins, since he will probably be expelled from the senate by early next year at the latest. Current tallies indicate that the Democrats picked up around 20 seats in the House and will have between an 81 an 88 vote majority.

Inexplicably the market rallied while the voting was taking place, with the Dow closing up 305 points or 3.3%. This was the biggest rally since 1980 when the market was first opened on election day. The previous biggest rally was a 1.2% gain in 1984 when Reagan defeated Mondale in a massive landslide that was universally predicted. Today, after seeing the returns all the major U.S. stock indices dropped 5% to 6%. Previously this would have been a headline news, but a drop of this magnitude has become commonplace in the last two months of high volatility trading.

Volatile markets are of course not healthy markets. A 305 point Dow rally yesterday, followed by a 487 point or 5.1% drop today should not inspire confidence. The S&P and Nasdaq were down a slightly greater percentage and the Russell was down the most with a 5.7% drop. Oil dropped $5.23 a barrel after an even bigger rally on election day. When Japan opened, the Nikkei followed the U.S. markets down, ending its morning session with a drop of 5.7%. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong was having an even bigger drop, while the Shanghai Composite hit a two-year low before attempting a recovery. Like the Nikkei, Korea and Taiwan were experiencing crash level drops at mid-day while Singapore and Australia were down somewhat less than 5%. If anything, volatility in Asian markets has been even greater than in the U.S.

In the longer term, there is a lot more to consider than the 5% to 6% drop in the U.S. markets today. Since September 2007, the New York Investing meetup has pointed out how the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have attempted to prevent and cover up economic problem before the presidential election. Well, the election is now over. Some of these actions may now start to unravel. If so, we shall begin to see this in the next month or two.

NEXT: When Stimulus Ceases to Be Stimulating

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Election's Impact on the Markets

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

In a perfectly free market, politics has no impact on trading and prices. The U.S. not only doesn't have a free market, but since the credit crisis began has veered increasingly toward dominant government control of the financial system. The election tomorrow is not likely to reduce that control, but instead shift it to other areas. The Bush administration has created de facto corporate socialism in the U.S. with the Wall Street bailout bill being the culminating event. An Obama administration will change the emphasis of programs toward the individual. Expect profitability for financial companies to be squeezed for at least the next four years and probably beyond as a result.

Obama is not only going to win tomorrow, but is likely to receive a mandate larger than the 6% plurality predicted on average by the polls (the New York Investing meetup predicted an 8% margin last Wednesday, the win could be even larger). While the presidential election is a forgone conclusion, a filibuster proof senate is still up for grabs. Legislation can be delayed or even stopped by a filibuster in the senate, unless 60 votes can be put together to end it. The chances of the Democrats achieving this goal have increased substantially in the last week. Three more Republican senators, - Dole in North Carolina, Coleman in Minnesota, and recently convicted felon, Stevens in Alaska - look to be in trouble. Chamblis in Georgia is still incorrectly considered safe, although his support took a nosedive after he voted for the bailout bill, by the political pundits. Early voting in Georgia indicates a well-above average African American vote in the election so far and this will defeat him if the numbers stay high. Seats could be lost by the Republicans in Mississippi and Kentucky as well. Whatever happens with the senate seats on election night, don't expect any improvement in 2010, since most seats that will be up then are now held by Republicans and a shift toward the Republican party that year would only manage to preserve the balance of power that was established in 2008.

A Democratic lock on the election process will not be considered a positive by the U.S. stock market. Even as of today though, it doesn't appear that this has been priced in. Only the trading on Wednesday and to some extent on Tuesday (information from supposedly secret exit polls flows to the major Wall Street players) will let us know. Any sell off should help to firmly establish a market bottom. Failing to break the lows of October 10th in the days following the election should be interpreted as a confirmation that an intermediate term bottom was already put in (the absolute bottom could be a year or even several years off however).

Voters don't leave the comfort of their homes to stand in line for four or more hours to express an opinion if they are happy with the status quo. This behavior has been seen throughout the United States in early voting and indicates an electorate that is angry and demanding change. Turnout is heading toward a record percentage for a modern U.S. election (ignore all comparisons before 1920 when women didn't have the right to vote), which would be anything above 135,000,000 votes. Since there are 187,000,000 registered voters (out of an eligible population of 213 million) as of the latest count, this target is more than possible. Expect the political shift that is taking place to create a shift as to what works in the markets as well.

NEXT: The Stock Market's Early Returns

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.